World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 48 5647 5415 380 372 306 6306

Eva-Maria Nöthig publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eva-Maria Nöthig between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eva-Maria Nöthig published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2015. 8 of the 308 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2015. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 8 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 49 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 2 publications
1986 2025

308 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eva-Maria Nöthig: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 1
1991 4
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 3
1997 2
1998 2
1999 4
2000 8
2001 0
2002 1
2003 8
2004 2
2005 5
2006 4
2007 8
2008 0
2009 17
2010 17
2011 17
2012 13
2013 17
2014 28
2015 49
2016 14
2017 11
2018 11
2019 17
2020 12
2021 9
2022 4
2023 4
2024 6
2025 2
Total 308
Download as CSV

Eva-Maria Nöthig publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva-Maria Nöthig sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 306 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130 306
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Eva-Maria Nöthig D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva-Maria Nöthig sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272 48
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Eva-Maria Nöthig is affiliated with the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Germany. Their research focuses primarily on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions to Environmental Science. Within these fields, their work encompasses key subfields such as Oceanography, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Chemistry, Ecology, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their main research topics include Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics, Marine and coastal ecosystems, Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology, Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses, Isotope Analysis in Ecology, and Marine Biology and Ecology Research.

Eva-Maria Nöthig has published extensively in various scientific journals. Their recent papers include:

  • "Sea-ice derived meltwater stratification slows the biological carbon pump: results from continuous observations," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "What Feeds the Benthos in the Arctic Basins? Assembling a Carbon Budget for the Deep Arctic Ocean," 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • "Sea ice presence is linked to higher carbon export and vertical microbial connectivity in the Eurasian Arctic Ocean," 2021, Communications Biology
  • "Summertime Chlorophyll a and Particulate Organic Carbon Standing Stocks in Surface Waters of the Fram Strait and the Arctic Ocean (1991-2015)," 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • "Dynamics of organic matter and bacterial activity in the Fram Strait during summer and autumn," 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences

Their frequent co-authors include Katja Metfies, Antje Boëtius, Anja Engel, Morten Hvitfeldt Iversen, and Simon Ramondenc. Eva-Maria Nöthig collaborates regularly with these researchers, contributing to a network of scientific inquiry in polar and marine research.

Their work has been published in several scientific venues, with the most frequent publication outlets being Frontiers in Marine Science, Limnology and Oceanography, the Publishing Network for Geoscientific and Environmental Data (PANGAEA) hosted by the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Nature Communications, and the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences.

Best Publications

  • Seasonal and Regional Variation in the Pelagial and its Relationship to the Life History Cycle of Krill

    Victor Smetacek;R. Scharek;Eva-Maria Nöthig

  • Methane production in aerobic oligotrophic surface water in the central Arctic Ocean

    Ellen Damm;Elisabeth Helmke;Silke Thoms;Ursula Schauer

  • The Weddell Gyre, Southern Ocean: Present Knowledge and Future Challenges

    M. Vernet;Walter Geibert;Mario Hoppema;P.J. Brown

  • HAUSGARTEN: Multidisciplinary Investigations at a Deep-Sea, Long-Term Observatory in the Arctic Ocean

    Thomas Soltwedel;Eduard Bauerfeind;Melanie Bergmann;Nataliya Budaeva

  • Depth-dependent elemental compositions of particulate organic matter (POM) in the ocean

    Birgit Schneider;Reiner Schlitzer;Gerhard Fischer;Eva-Maria Nöthig

  • Natural variability or anthropogenically-induced variation? Insights from 15 years of multidisciplinary observations at the arctic marine LTER site HAUSGARTEN

    Thomas Soltwedel;Eduard Bauerfeind;Melanie Bergmann;Astrid Bracher;Astrid Bracher

  • Summertime plankton ecology in Fram Strait - a compilation of long- and short-term observations

    Eva-Maria Nöthig;Astrid Bracher;Anja Engel;Katja Metfies

  • Tracing dissolved organic substances and nutrients from the Lena River through Laptev Sea (Arctic)

    Gerhard Kattner;J. M. Lobbes;H. P. Fitznar;R. Engbrodt

  • Lithogenic and biogenic particle fluxes on the Lomonosov Ridge (central Arctic Ocean) and their relevance for sediment accumulation: Vertical vs. lateral transport

    Kirsten Fahl;Eva-Maria Nöthig

  • Arctic warming interrupts the Transpolar Drift and affects long-range transport of sea ice and ice-rafted matter

    Thomas Krumpen;H. Jakob Belter;Antje Boetius;Ellen Damm

  • Particulate Organic Carbon Flux to the Arctic Ocean Sea Floor

    P. Wassmann;E. Bauerfeind;M. Fortier;M. Fukuchi

  • Particle sedimentation patterns in the eastern Fram Strait during 2000-2005: Results from the Arctic long-term observatory HAUSGARTEN

    Eduard Bauerfeind;Eva-Maria Nöthig;Agnieszka Beszczynska;Kirsten Fahl

  • Coastal eutrophication: Causes and consequences

    Victor Smetacek;Ulrich Bathmann;Eva-Maria Nöthig;R. Scharek

  • Seasonal shifts in ice edge phytoplankton blooms in the Barents Sea related to the water column stability

    Volker Strass;Eva-Maria Nöthig

  • Sea-ice derived meltwater stratification slows the biological carbon pump: results from continuous observations

    Unknown

  • Composition, biomass and potential grazing impact of the crustacean and pelagic tunicates in the northern Humboldt Current area off Chile: differences between El Nino and non- El Nino years

    Humberto E. González;Marcus Sobarzo;Dante Figueroa;Eva-Maria Nöthig

  • Occurrence and vertical flux of faecal pellets of probably protozoan origin in the southeastern Weddell Sea (Antarctica

    Eva-Maria Nöthig;B. von Bodungen

  • Structure and function of contemporary food webs on Arctic shelves: A panarctic comparison: The pelagic system of the Kara Sea – Communities and components of carbon flow

    Hans-Jürgen Hirche;Ksenia Kosobokova;B. Gaye-Haake;I. Harms

  • Phytoplankton distribution in relation to sea ice, hydrography and nutrients in the northwestern Weddell Sea in early spring 1988 during EPOS

    F. Bianchi;A. Boldrin;F. Cioce;Gerhard Dieckmann

  • Influence of the physical environment on polar phytoplankton blooms: A case study in the Fram Strait

    Alexandra Cherkasheva;Alexandra Cherkasheva;Astrid Bracher;Astrid Bracher;Christian Melsheimer;Cornelia Köberle

  • Impact of a warm anomaly on export fluxes of biogenic matter in the eastern Fram Strait

    Catherine Lalande;Eduard Bauerfeind;Eva-Maria Nöthig;Agnieszka Beszczynska-Möller

  • Low export flux of particulate organic carbon in the central Arctic Ocean as revealed by 234Th:238U disequilibrium.

    P. Cai;M. Rutgers van der Loeff;I. Stimac;E.-M. Nöthig

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Soltwedel
Thomas Soltwedel Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Michael Klages
Michael Klages Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Astrid Bracher
Astrid Bracher University of Bremen
Kirsten Fahl
Kirsten Fahl Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Ilka Peeken
Ilka Peeken Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Antje Boetius
Antje Boetius Max Planck Society
Anja Engel
Anja Engel GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Melanie Bergmann
Melanie Bergmann Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Agnieszka Beszczynska-Möller
Agnieszka Beszczynska-Möller Polish Academy of Sciences
Lars Kaleschke
Lars Kaleschke Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students consider programs that balance rigorous content with manageable coursework, such as what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get, helping them identify accessible yet fulfilling educational paths.

Specialized fields like geoscience offer targeted knowledge about Earth's systems, making an online geoscience degree a valuable option. Such programs often provide flexibility for students balancing work and study.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is another crucial area within environmental sciences, enabling the analysis of spatial data to address environmental challenges. Pursuing top-tier education through top GIS masters programs can enhance technical skills and career prospects in this growing field.

For those aiming to impact public policy and administration related to environmental issues, an advanced degree like a Master of Public Administration (MPA) is beneficial. Exploring best online MPA programs can lead to leadership roles that shape sustainable practices and regulations.

Best Scientists Citing Eva-Maria Nöthig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles