World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
10768
World Ranking
9378
National Ranking
216

Enrico Tomelleri publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrico Tomelleri sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 80 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Enrico Tomelleri D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrico Tomelleri sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Enrico Tomelleri is affiliated with the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano in Italy and has contributed extensively to the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on various subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Atmospheric Science.

Their work covers a range of topics including Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications, Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies, Fire effects on ecosystems, and Forest ecology and management.

Recent publications by Tomelleri include:

  • Multi-sensor spectral synergies for crop stress detection and monitoring in the optical domain: A review, 2022, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • LiDAR GEDI derived tree canopy height heterogeneity reveals patterns of biodiversity in forest ecosystems, 2023, Ecological Informatics
  • A new generation of sensors and monitoring tools to support climate-smart forestry practices, 2021, Canadian Journal of Forest Research
  • The albedo-climate penalty of hydropower reservoirs, 2021, Nature Energy
  • Reviews and syntheses: Remotely sensed optical time series for monitoring vegetation productivity, 2024, Biogeosciences

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Tomelleri include Egor Prikaziuk, Gerbrand Koren, Jochem Verrelst, Katja Berger, and Lukas Valentin Graf.

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Remote Sensing, Forest Ecology and Management, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Biogeosciences.

Best Publications

  • Terrestrial Gross Carbon Dioxide Uptake: Global Distribution and Covariation with Climate

    Christian Beer;Markus Reichstein;Enrico Tomelleri;Philippe Ciais

  • Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply

    Martin Jung;Markus Reichstein;Philippe Ciais;Sonia I. Seneviratne

  • Influence of spring and autumn phenological transitions on forest ecosystem productivity

    Andrew D. Richardson;T. Andy Black;Philippe Ciais;Nicolas Delbart

  • Improving land surface models with FLUXNET data

    Mathew Williams;Andrew D. Richardson;M. Reichstein;Paul C. Stoy

  • The European carbon balance. Part 2: croplands

    P. Ciais;M. Wattenbach;N. Vuichard;P. Smith

  • A few extreme events dominate global interannual variability in gross primary production

    Jakob Zscheischler;Jakob Zscheischler;Miguel D Mahecha;Jannis von Buttlar;Stefan Harmeling

  • Multi-sensor spectral synergies for crop stress detection and monitoring in the optical domain: A review

    Unknown

  • North American Carbon Program (NACP) regional interim synthesis: Terrestrial biospheric model intercomparison

    D. N. Huntzinger;W. M. Post;Y. Wei;A. M. Michalak

  • Phenopix: A R package for image-based vegetation phenology

    Gianluca Filippa;Edoardo Cremonese;Mirco Migliavacca;Marta Galvagno

  • The net biome production of full crop rotations in Europe

    W. L. Kutsch;M. Aubinet;N. Buchmann;P. Smith

  • The REFLEX project: Comparing different algorithms and implementations for the inversion of a terrestrial ecosystem model against eddy covariance data

    Andrew Fox;Mathew Williams;Andrew D. Richardson;David Cameron

  • Semiempirical modeling of abiotic and biotic factors controlling ecosystem respiration across eddy covariance sites

    Mirco Migliavacca;Mirco Migliavacca;Markus Reichstein;Andrew D. Richardson;Roberto Colombo

  • Uncertainty analysis of gross primary production upscaling using Random Forests, remote sensing and eddy covariance data

    Gianluca Tramontana;Kazuito Ichii;Gustau Camps-Valls;Enrico Tomelleri

  • Analyzing the causes and spatial pattern of the European 2003 carbon flux anomaly using seven models

    M. Vetter;Galina Churkina;M. Jung;Markus Reichstein

  • Carbon cycle uncertainty in the Alaskan Arctic

    J. B. Fisher;M. Sikka;W. C. Oechel;D. N. Huntzinger

  • The urban imprint on plant phenology.

    Georg Wohlfahrt;Enrico Tomelleri;Albin Hammerle

  • Extreme events in gross primary production: a characterization across continents

    Jakob Zscheischler;Jakob Zscheischler;Markus Reichstein;S. Harmeling;A. Rammig

  • Evaluation of continental carbon cycle simulations with North American flux tower observations

    Brett M. Raczka;Kenneth J. Davis;Deborah Huntzinger;Ronald P. Neilson

  • The carbon balance of European croplands: A cross-site comparison of simulation models

    Martin Wattenbach;Oliver Sus;Nicolas Vuichard;Simon Lehuger

  • Remote sensing of ecosystem light use efficiency with MODIS-based PRI

    Anna Goerner;M. Reichstein;E. Tomelleri;N. Hanan

  • Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence II: review of passive measurement setups, protocols, and their application at the leaf to canopy level

    Helge Aasen;Shari Van Wittenberghe;Neus Sabater Medina;Neus Sabater Medina;Alexander Damm;Alexander Damm

Frequent Co-Authors

Markus Reichstein
Markus Reichstein Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Dario Papale
Dario Papale Tuscia University
Nuno Carvalhais
Nuno Carvalhais Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Georg Wohlfahrt
Georg Wohlfahrt University of Innsbruck
Christian Beer
Christian Beer Stockholm University
Nicolas Viovy
Nicolas Viovy French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)
Mirco Migliavacca
Mirco Migliavacca Joint Research Centre
Martin Jung
Martin Jung Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Andrew D. Richardson
Andrew D. Richardson Northern Arizona University
Miguel D. Mahecha
Miguel D. Mahecha Leipzig University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related fields can broaden career opportunities. Programs like an online bachelors in sociology provide insight into human-environment interactions, crucial for understanding societal impacts on the environment.

Education professionals looking to blend environmental education with advanced teaching credentials might consider online eds to edd bridge program options, which offer flexible pathways from a master’s to a doctoral degree.

For those seeking leadership roles without the time commitment of a dissertation, education doctoral programs without dissertation can be an ideal solution.

Additionally, careers integrating social work and environmental advocacy benefit from programs like the online dsw programs, which prepare graduates for advanced practice and policy making in social and ecological contexts.

Best Scientists Citing Enrico Tomelleri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles