World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 46 3651 3366 152 145 154 8377

Elly A. Stolk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elly A. Stolk between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elly A. Stolk published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2017. 11 of the 178 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2017. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 7 publications
1999 2025

178 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elly A. Stolk: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 7
2001 4
2002 5
2003 2
2004 4
2005 7
2006 4
2007 6
2008 4
2009 5
2010 7
2011 3
2012 4
2013 9
2014 6
2015 15
2016 12
2017 16
2018 8
2019 10
2020 2
2021 2
2022 16
2023 7
2024 4
2025 7
Total 178
Download as CSV

Elly A. Stolk publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elly A. Stolk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 154–163 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 154 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411 154
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Elly A. Stolk D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elly A. Stolk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228 46
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Elly A. Stolk is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands and has a research focus on the intersection of economics, health systems, and quality of life. Their academic work spans multiple areas within Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, supported by a significant publication record in subfields such as Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

The main topics covered by Stolk's research include:

  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research

Frequent collaborators in their work include Axel Mühlbacher, Richard Norman, Brendan Mulhern, Nan Luo, and Michael Drummond, indicating sustained partnerships that have contributed to their research output.

Stolk has published extensively in several academic journals, with the majority of publications appearing in:

  • Value in Health
  • PharmacoEconomics
  • Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
  • The European Journal of Health Economics
  • Medical Decision Making

Among their recent papers are:

  • "International Valuation Protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L" (2020), published in PharmacoEconomics
  • "Development of an EQ-5D Value Set for India Using an Extended Design (DEVINE) Study: The Indian 5-Level Version EQ-5D Value Set" (2022), published in Value in Health
  • "Valuation Survey of EQ-5D-Y Based on the International Common Protocol: Development of a Value Set in Japan" (2021), published in Medical Decision Making
  • "Comparing measurement properties of EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L in paediatric patients" (2021), published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
  • "Valuing EQ-5D-Y: the current state of play" (2022), published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Their research often addresses health economic evaluation methods, valuation protocols, and measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments like the EQ-5D-Y across different populations and countries.

Best Publications

  • Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D

    Matthijs M. Versteegh;Karin M. Vermeulen;Silvia M. A. A. Evers;Silvia M. A. A. Evers;G. Ardine de Wit

  • Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide

    Esther W. de Bekker-Grob;Bas Donkers;Marcel F. Jonker;Elly A. Stolk

  • Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol.

    Elly Stolk;Kristina Ludwig;Kim Rand;Ben van Hout

  • Quality of life instruments for economic evaluations in health and social care for older people: a systematic review.

    Peter Makai;Werner B.F. Brouwer;Marc A. Koopmanschap;Elly A. Stolk

  • Towards a multi-criteria approach for priority setting: an application to Ghana

    Rob Baltussen;Elly Stolk;Dan Chisholm;Moses Kweku Aikins

  • Quality Control Process for EQ-5D-5L Valuation Studies.

    Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi;Mark Oppe;Bernhard Slaap;Jan van Busschbach

  • Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods.

    Arthur E. Attema;Yvette Edelaar-Peeters;Matthijs M. Versteegh;Elly A. Stolk

  • Direct versus Indirect Treatment for Preschool Children who Stutter: The RESTART Randomized Trial

    Caroline de Sonneville-Koedoot;Elly Stolk;Toni Rietveld;Marie-Christine Franken

  • Introducing the composite time trade-off: a test of feasibility and face validity

    Bas M. F. Janssen;Mark Oppe;Matthijs M. Versteegh;Elly A. Stolk

  • EQ-5D in Central and Eastern Europe: 2000–2015

    Fanni Rencz;Fanni Rencz;László Gulácsi;Michael Drummond;Dominik Golicki

  • Reconciliation of economic concerns and health policy: illustration of an equity adjustment procedure using proportional shortfall.

    Elly A. Stolk;Gijs van Donselaar;Werner B. F. Brouwer;Jan J. V. Busschbach

  • Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: A discrete choice experiment in fertility care

    Inge W.H. van Empel;Eline A.F. Dancet;Eline A.F. Dancet;Eline A.F. Dancet;Xander H.E. Koolman;Willianne L.D.M. Nelen

  • Quality of life in adults who stutter

    Caroline Koedoot;Clazien Bouwmans;Marie-Christine Franken;Elly Stolk

  • International Valuation Protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L

    Juan M. Ramos-Goñi;Mark Oppe;Elly Stolk;Koonal Shah

  • Development of an EQ-5D Value Set for India Using an Extended Design (DEVINE) Study: The Indian 5-Level Version EQ-5D Value Set.

    Unknown

  • Discrete choice modeling for the quantification of health states: the case of the EQ-5D.

    Elly A. Stolk;Mark Oppe;Luciana Scalone;Paul F.M. Krabbe

  • Balancing equity and efficiency in the Dutch basic benefits package using the principle of proportional shortfall

    E. J. van de Wetering;E. A. Stolk;N. J. A. van Exel;W. B. F. Brouwer

  • Preferences for long-term care services: Willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment

    Anna P. Nieboer;Xander Koolman;Elly A. Stolk

  • A nonparametric elicitation of the equity-efficiency trade-off in cost-utility analysis.

    Han Bleichrodt;Jason Doctor;Elly Stolk

  • Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures: Benefit or Burden?

    Matthijs M. Versteegh;Annemieke Leunis;Carin A. Uyl-de Groot;Elly A. Stolk

  • Short term and long term health related quality of life after congenital anorectal malformations and congenital diaphragmatic hernia

    Marten Poley;Elly Stolk;Dick Tibboel;J.C. Molenaar

  • Performance of the EuroQol in children with imperforate anus.

    Elly A. Stolk;Jan J.V. Busschbach;Ton Vogels

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy Devlin
Nancy Devlin University of Melbourne
Werner B. F. Brouwer
Werner B. F. Brouwer Erasmus University Rotterdam
Esther W. de Bekker-Grob
Esther W. de Bekker-Grob Erasmus University Rotterdam
John Brazier
John Brazier University of Sheffield
Marc A. Koopmanschap
Marc A. Koopmanschap Erasmus University Rotterdam
Louis W. Niessen
Louis W. Niessen Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Job van Exel
Job van Exel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Gouke J. Bonsel
Gouke J. Bonsel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Brendan Mulhern
Brendan Mulhern University of Technology Sydney
Michael Herdman
Michael Herdman University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens a wide variety of online degree options and career paths. For those interested in counseling, there are several cacrep accredited universities offering affordable online programs. Earning a degree from these institutions can help you meet the highest professional standards in the counseling field.

If your interests lie in providing support to couples and families, consider pursuing marriage and family therapy master's programs online. These specialized degrees prepare graduates to help families navigate complex relationships and life challenges.

Broadening your expertise in human behavior and mental processes is also possible with a psychology online degree. This flexible path can lead to careers in clinical practice, research, education, and more.

For those drawn to social work, there are numerous online msw (Master of Social Work) programs designed for accessibility and ease of admission. These programs offer advanced training to support individuals and communities through direct practice or policy work.

Best Scientists Citing Elly A. Stolk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles