World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Edwin Reynders

Edwin Reynders

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 36 2475 2316 23 21 273 8103

Edwin Reynders publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edwin Reynders between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edwin Reynders published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 13.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2024. 9 of the 304 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2024. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
2004 2026

304 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edwin Reynders: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 5
2006 10
2007 13
2008 22
2009 19
2010 13
2011 12
2012 16
2013 11
2014 14
2015 8
2016 16
2017 16
2018 12
2019 14
2020 15
2021 14
2022 14
2023 24
2024 26
2025 8
2026 1
Total 304
Download as CSV

Edwin Reynders publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin Reynders sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 267–276 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 273 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88 273
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Edwin Reynders D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin Reynders sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139 36
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Edwin Reynders is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and specializes in Engineering, with a strong focus on Civil and Structural Engineering. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Biomedical Engineering, Speech and Hearing, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Mechanics of Materials.

The primary topics of Reynders' research encompass Structural Health Monitoring Techniques, Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research, Noise Effects and Management, Concrete Corrosion and Durability, Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation, Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis, and Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring.

Recent publications reflect a concentration on structural health monitoring and vibration analysis, including:

  • Validation of vibration-based structural health monitoring on retrofitted railway bridge KW51 (2021, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing)
  • One-year operational modal analysis of a steel bridge from high-resolution macrostrain monitoring: Influence of temperature vs. retrofitting (2021, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing)
  • Uncertainty quantification in data-driven stochastic subspace identification (2020, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing)
  • An efficient approach to model updating for a multispan railway bridge using orthogonal diagonalization combined with improved particle swarm optimization (2020, Journal of Sound and Vibration)
  • The role of modal parameters uncertainty estimation in automated modal identification, modal tracking and data normalization (2020, Engineering Structures)

Frequent co-authors associated with Reynders' work include Cédric Van hoorickx, Geert Lombaert, Dimitrios Anastasopoulos, Guido De Roeck, and Daniele Giannini.

Publications have appeared predominantly in these venues:

  • NOISE-CON proceedings
  • Journal of Sound and Vibration
  • Engineering Structures
  • Applied Acoustics
  • Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

Best Publications

  • System Identification Methods for (Operational) Modal Analysis: Review and Comparison

    Edwin Reynders

  • Vibration based Structural Health Monitoring using output-only measurements under changing environment

    A. Deraemaeker;E. Reynders;G. De Roeck;J. Kullaa

  • An augmented Kalman filter for force identification in structural dynamics

    E. Lourens;E. Reynders;G. De Roeck;G. Degrande

  • Fully automated (operational) modal analysis

    Edwin Reynders;Jeroen Houbrechts;Guido De Roeck

  • Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification

    Edwin Reynders;Rik Pintelon;Guido De Roeck

  • Reference-based combined deterministic–stochastic subspace identification for experimental and operational modal analysis

    Edwin Reynders;Guido De Roeck

  • Joint input-response estimation for structural systems based on reduced-order models and vibration data from a limited number of sensors

    E. Lourens;C. Papadimitriou;C. Papadimitriou;S. Gillijns;E. Reynders

  • Output-only structural health monitoring in changing environmental conditions by means of nonlinear system identification:

    Edwin Reynders;Gersom Wursten;Guido De Roeck

  • Uncertainty quantification in operational modal analysis with stochastic subspace identification: Validation and applications

    Edwin Reynders;Kristof Maes;Geert Lombaert;Guido De Roeck

  • Experimental and numerical analysis of a composite bridge for high-speed trains

    K. Liu;E. Reynders;G. De Roeck;G. Lombaert

  • Sensitivity-based finite element model updating using constrained optimization with a trust region algorithm

    Pelin Gundes Bakir;Pelin Gundes Bakir;Edwin Reynders;Guido De Roeck

  • Finite element model updating and structural damage identification using OMAX data

    Edwin Reynders;Anne Teughels;Guido De Roeck

  • Damage Identification on the Tilff Bridge by Vibration Monitoring Using Optical Fiber Strain Sensors

    Edwin Reynders;Guido De Roeck;Pelin Gundes Bakir;Claude Sauvage

  • Design of sensor networks for instantaneous inversion of modally reduced order models in structural dynamics

    K. Maes;E. Lourens;E. Lourens;K. Van Nimmen;E. Reynders

  • A local flexibility method for vibration-based damage localization and quantification

    Edwin Reynders;Guido De Roeck

  • Validation of vibration-based structural health monitoring on retrofitted railway bridge KW51

    K. Maes;L. Van Meerbeeck;E.P.B. Reynders;G. Lombaert

  • The influence of environmental parameters on the dynamic behaviour of the San Frediano bell tower in Lucca

    Riccardo Mario Azzara;Guido De Roeck;Maria Girardi;Cristina Padovani

  • Finite element modelling of a silo based on experimental modal analysis

    D. Dooms;G. Degrande;G. De Roeck;E. Reynders

  • An improved finite element model updating method by the global optimization technique 'Coupled Local Minimizers'

    Pelin Gundes Bakir;Edwin Reynders;Guido De Roeck

  • Modal contribution and state space order selection in operational modal analysis

    F. Javier Cara;Jesús Juan;Enrique Alarcón;Edwin Reynders

  • The Local Flexibility method for Vibration-based damage localization and quantification

    Edwin Reynders;Guido De Roeck

  • Damage identification on the Tilff bridge by vibration monitoring using optical fiber strain sensors

    Edwin Reynders;Guido De Roeck;Anne Teughels;P.G Bakir

Frequent Co-Authors

G. De Roeck
G. De Roeck KU Leuven
Robin S. Langley
Robin S. Langley University of Cambridge
Francis Berghmans
Francis Berghmans Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Filipe Magalhães
Filipe Magalhães University of Porto
Patrick Guillaume
Patrick Guillaume Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Álvaro Cunha
Álvaro Cunha University of Porto
Costas Papadimitriou
Costas Papadimitriou University Of Thessaly
Rik Pintelon
Rik Pintelon Vrije Universiteit Brussel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering reveals diverse educational routes that complement this technical foundation. For example, individuals interested in understanding human behavior in high-pressure environments may consider programs highlighted in forensic profiler salary. This path includes advanced psychological and investigative training that pairs well with engineering problem-solving skills.

For those leaning towards helping professions, various types of therapist degrees offer specialized knowledge in mental health support, complementing technical expertise with emotional intelligence.

If you’re contemplating advanced studies but want to balance time and workload, understanding what is the easiest counseling degree can help you select a program that suits your pace and goals without sacrificing quality.

Similarly, those interested in fast-tracking their education might explore options like the fastest bcba program, which offers accelerated paths to certification. Online degrees like these provide flexible opportunities for engineers expanding into interdisciplinary roles.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin Reynders

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles