World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
35
Citations
5623
World Ranking
2630
National Ranking
92

Carmelo Gentile publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carmelo Gentile sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 297 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Carmelo Gentile D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carmelo Gentile sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Ambient vibration testing of historic masonry towers for structural identification and damage assessment

    Unknown

  • Automated modal identification in operational conditions and its application to bridges

    Filippo Ubertini;Carmelo Gentile;Annibale Luigi Materazzi

  • One-year dynamic monitoring of a historic tower: damage detection under changing environment

    Unknown

  • Post-earthquake continuous dynamic monitoring of the Gabbia Tower in Mantua, Italy

    Unknown

  • An interferometric radar for non-contact measurement of deflections on civil engineering structures: laboratory and full-scale tests

    Unknown

  • Automated modal identification and tracking: Application to an iron arch bridge

    Alessandro Cabboi;Filipe Magalhães;Carmelo Gentile;Álvaro Cunha

  • From continuous vibration monitoring to FEM-based damage assessment: Application on a stone-masonry tower

    Unknown

  • Deflection measurement on vibrating stay cables by non-contact microwave interferometer

    Unknown

  • Structural Identification of a Masonry Tower Based on Operational Modal Analysis

    Unknown

  • Review of deuterium-tritium results from the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor

    K. M. McGuire;H. Adler;P. Alling;C. Ancher

  • Output-only modal identification of a reinforced concrete bridge from radar-based measurements

    Unknown

  • Operational modal testing and FE model tuning of a cable-stayed bridge

    Unknown

  • Ambient vibration testing and structural evaluation of an historic suspension footbridge

    Unknown

  • Operational modal testing of historic structures at different levels of excitation

    Unknown

  • Model updating of a historic concrete bridge by sensitivity- and global optimization-based Latin Hypercube Sampling

    Rosalba Ferrari;Diego Froio;Egidio Rizzi;Carmelo Gentile

  • Ambient vibration testing and condition assessment of the Paderno iron arch bridge (1889)

    Unknown

  • Plasma wall interaction and tritium retention in TFTR

    C.H. Skinner;E. Amarescu;G. Ascione;W. Blanchard

  • Post-earthquake diagnostic investigation of a historic masonry tower

    Unknown

  • DYNAMIC INVESTIGATION OF A REPAIRED CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE

    Unknown

  • Continuous monitoring of a challenging heritage tower in Monza, Italy

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Filippo Ubertini
Filippo Ubertini University of Perugia
Eleni Chatzi
Eleni Chatzi ETH Zurich
Álvaro Cunha
Álvaro Cunha University of Porto
Filipe Magalhães
Filipe Magalhães University of Porto
Dimitrios G. Aggelis
Dimitrios G. Aggelis Vrije Universiteit Brussel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students pursuing Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering often explore related fields that complement their technical skills and broaden career options. For those interested in fast-tracking their education, fast track speech pathology programs offer a quick pathway to a specialized healthcare career. These programs emphasize communication sciences, which can intersect with engineering projects focused on assistive technologies.

For graduates intrigued by behavioral sciences, understanding the requirements of the FBI Behavioral Analysis Unit reveals opportunities where engineering expertise meets criminal profiling, especially in areas like forensic engineering or threat assessment technology.

Additionally, exploring different types of counseling degrees can provide insight into fields centered on mental health and human behavior, complementing technical roles with people-oriented skills. For those seeking manageable options, knowing what is the easiest counseling degree to attain online can help balance rigorous engineering study with flexible, supportive learning paths.

Overall, diversifying education through related online degrees can open new avenues for career development beyond traditional engineering roles.

Best Scientists Citing Carmelo Gentile