World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 39 2192 2040 795 700 158 4548

Babak Moaveni publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Babak Moaveni between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Babak Moaveni published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2024. 17 of the 178 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2024. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 2 publications
2003 2026

178 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Babak Moaveni: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 5
2009 8
2010 7
2011 3
2012 8
2013 11
2014 9
2015 7
2016 5
2017 9
2018 7
2019 10
2020 11
2021 12
2022 13
2023 15
2024 17
2025 15
2026 2
Total 178
Download as CSV

Babak Moaveni publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Babak Moaveni sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 157–166 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 158 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132 158
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Babak Moaveni D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Babak Moaveni sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126 39
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Environmental effects on the identified natural frequencies of the Dowling Hall Footbridge

    Peter Moser;Babak Moaveni

  • Hierarchical Bayesian model updating for structural identification

    Iman Behmanesh;Babak Moaveni;Geert Lombaert;Costas Papadimitriou

  • Damage identification study of a seven-story full-scale building slice tested on the UCSD-NEES shake table

    Babak Moaveni;Xianfei He;Joel P. Conte;Jose I. Restrepo

  • Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of Damage Identification Results Obtained Using Finite Element Model Updating

    Babak Moaveni;Joel P. Conte;François M. Hemez

  • System Identification Study of a 7-Story Full-Scale Building Slice Tested on the UCSD-NEES Shake Table

    Babak Moaveni;Xianfei He;Joel P. Conte;José I. Restrepo

  • Probabilistic identification of simulated damage on the Dowling Hall footbridge through Bayesian finite element model updating

    Iman Behmanesh;Babak Moaveni

  • Accounting for environmental variability, modeling errors, and parameter estimation uncertainties in structural identification

    Iman Behmanesh;Babak Moaveni

  • Effects of changing ambient temperature on finite element model updating of the Dowling Hall Footbridge

    Babak Moaveni;Iman Behmanesh

  • Crowdsensing Framework for Monitoring Bridge Vibrations Using Moving Smartphones

    Thomas J. Matarazzo;Paolo Santi;Shamim N. Pakzad;Kristopher Carter

  • Adaptive Kalman filters for nonlinear finite element model updating

    Mingming Song;Rodrigo Astroza;Hamed Ebrahimian;Babak Moaveni

  • Dynamic Testing of Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge

    Joel P. Conte;Xianfei He;Babak Moaveni;Sami F. Masri

  • System Identification of Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge Using Dynamic Field Test Data

    Xianfei He;Babak Moaveni;Joel P. Conte;Ahmed Elgamal

  • Finite-Element Model Updating for Assessment of Progressive Damage in a 3-Story Infilled RC Frame

    Babak Moaveni;Andreas Stavridis;Geert Lombaert;Joel P. Conte

  • Hierarchical Bayesian modeling framework for model updating and robust predictions in structural dynamics using modal features

    Unknown

  • Uncertainty Quantification in the Assessment of Progressive Damage in a 7-Story Full-Scale Building Slice

    Ellen Simoen;Babak Moaveni;Joel P. Conte;Geert Lombaert

  • Modal Identification Study of Vincent Thomas Bridge Using Simulated Wind-Induced Ambient Vibration Data

    Xianfei He;Babak Moaveni;Joel P. Conte;Ahmed Elgamal

  • Design and Deployment of a Continuous Monitoring System for the Dowling Hall Footbridge

    P. Moser;B. Moaveni

  • Nonlinear model updating through a hierarchical Bayesian modeling framework

    Unknown

  • General Realization Algorithm for Modal Identification of Linear Dynamic Systems

    R. A. De Callafon;B. Moaveni;J. P. Conte;X. He

  • Damage Identification of a Composite Beam Using Finite Element Model Updating

    Babak Moaveni;Xianfei He;Joel P. Conte;Raymond A. de Callafon

Frequent Co-Authors

Joel P. Conte
Joel P. Conte University of California, San Diego
Costas Papadimitriou
Costas Papadimitriou University Of Thessaly
Gaëtan Kerschen
Gaëtan Kerschen University of Liège
Sami F. Masri
Sami F. Masri University of Southern California
Ahmed Elgamal
Ahmed Elgamal University of California, San Diego
Eleni Chatzi
Eleni Chatzi ETH Zurich
Hugo Rodrigues
Hugo Rodrigues University of Aveiro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, exploring related online degrees can broaden career options. For example, a 5-year speech pathology program offers a unique interdisciplinary approach, combining technical skills with human communication expertise, which can be valuable in aerospace technology development involving human factors.

Understanding career pathways also includes exploring roles such as criminal profilers, whose salary outlook reflects specialized skill sets. Resources like criminal profiler salary highlight how education intersects with salary expectations in niche areas.

Additionally, students might consider degrees in fields like counseling to complement their engineering backgrounds, especially when interested in leadership or team management. Exploring different types of counseling degrees can help identify a path that aligns with one’s interests and career goals.

For those seeking an entry point, learning about what is the easiest counseling degree may provide insights on accessible options, making it easier to combine technical engineering skills with interpersonal development.

Best Scientists Citing Babak Moaveni

Recently Published Articles