World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
39
Citations
4548
World Ranking
2192
National Ranking
795

Babak Moaveni publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Babak Moaveni sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 158 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Babak Moaveni D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Babak Moaveni sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Environmental effects on the identified natural frequencies of the Dowling Hall Footbridge

    Peter Moser;Babak Moaveni

  • Hierarchical Bayesian model updating for structural identification

    Iman Behmanesh;Babak Moaveni;Geert Lombaert;Costas Papadimitriou

  • Damage identification study of a seven-story full-scale building slice tested on the UCSD-NEES shake table

    Babak Moaveni;Xianfei He;Joel P. Conte;Jose I. Restrepo

  • Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of Damage Identification Results Obtained Using Finite Element Model Updating

    Babak Moaveni;Joel P. Conte;François M. Hemez

  • System Identification Study of a 7-Story Full-Scale Building Slice Tested on the UCSD-NEES Shake Table

    Babak Moaveni;Xianfei He;Joel P. Conte;José I. Restrepo

  • Probabilistic identification of simulated damage on the Dowling Hall footbridge through Bayesian finite element model updating

    Iman Behmanesh;Babak Moaveni

  • Accounting for environmental variability, modeling errors, and parameter estimation uncertainties in structural identification

    Iman Behmanesh;Babak Moaveni

  • Effects of changing ambient temperature on finite element model updating of the Dowling Hall Footbridge

    Babak Moaveni;Iman Behmanesh

  • Crowdsensing Framework for Monitoring Bridge Vibrations Using Moving Smartphones

    Thomas J. Matarazzo;Paolo Santi;Shamim N. Pakzad;Kristopher Carter

  • Adaptive Kalman filters for nonlinear finite element model updating

    Mingming Song;Rodrigo Astroza;Hamed Ebrahimian;Babak Moaveni

  • Dynamic Testing of Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge

    Joel P. Conte;Xianfei He;Babak Moaveni;Sami F. Masri

  • System Identification of Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge Using Dynamic Field Test Data

    Xianfei He;Babak Moaveni;Joel P. Conte;Ahmed Elgamal

  • Finite-Element Model Updating for Assessment of Progressive Damage in a 3-Story Infilled RC Frame

    Babak Moaveni;Andreas Stavridis;Geert Lombaert;Joel P. Conte

  • Hierarchical Bayesian modeling framework for model updating and robust predictions in structural dynamics using modal features

    Unknown

  • Uncertainty Quantification in the Assessment of Progressive Damage in a 7-Story Full-Scale Building Slice

    Ellen Simoen;Babak Moaveni;Joel P. Conte;Geert Lombaert

  • Modal Identification Study of Vincent Thomas Bridge Using Simulated Wind-Induced Ambient Vibration Data

    Xianfei He;Babak Moaveni;Joel P. Conte;Ahmed Elgamal

  • Design and Deployment of a Continuous Monitoring System for the Dowling Hall Footbridge

    P. Moser;B. Moaveni

  • Nonlinear model updating through a hierarchical Bayesian modeling framework

    Unknown

  • General Realization Algorithm for Modal Identification of Linear Dynamic Systems

    R. A. De Callafon;B. Moaveni;J. P. Conte;X. He

  • Damage Identification of a Composite Beam Using Finite Element Model Updating

    Babak Moaveni;Xianfei He;Joel P. Conte;Raymond A. de Callafon

Frequent Co-Authors

Joel P. Conte
Joel P. Conte University of California, San Diego
Costas Papadimitriou
Costas Papadimitriou University Of Thessaly
Gaëtan Kerschen
Gaëtan Kerschen University of Liège
Sami F. Masri
Sami F. Masri University of Southern California
Ahmed Elgamal
Ahmed Elgamal University of California, San Diego
Eleni Chatzi
Eleni Chatzi ETH Zurich
Hugo Rodrigues
Hugo Rodrigues University of Aveiro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, exploring related online degrees can broaden career options. For example, a 5-year speech pathology program offers a unique interdisciplinary approach, combining technical skills with human communication expertise, which can be valuable in aerospace technology development involving human factors.

Understanding career pathways also includes exploring roles such as criminal profilers, whose salary outlook reflects specialized skill sets. Resources like criminal profiler salary highlight how education intersects with salary expectations in niche areas.

Additionally, students might consider degrees in fields like counseling to complement their engineering backgrounds, especially when interested in leadership or team management. Exploring different types of counseling degrees can help identify a path that aligns with one’s interests and career goals.

For those seeking an entry point, learning about what is the easiest counseling degree may provide insights on accessible options, making it easier to combine technical engineering skills with interpersonal development.

Best Scientists Citing Babak Moaveni

Recently Published Articles