World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
6848
World Ranking
7036
National Ranking
2368

Edward O. Garton publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward O. Garton sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 84 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Edward O. Garton D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward O. Garton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward O. Garton is affiliated with the University of Idaho in the United States. Their research spans several fields related to environmental and earth sciences, with a focus on ecology and atmospheric science.

Their work primarily addresses themes within wildlife ecology and conservation, rangeland and wildlife management, and the impacts of climate change and permafrost. These topics form the core of their scholarly contributions and reflect a multidisciplinary approach to understanding environmental challenges.

Edward O. Garton's published output includes studies in recognized academic venues. One such publication is:

  • Habitat selection by Dall's sheep is influenced by multiple factors including direct and indirect climate effects, 2021, PLoS ONE

Throughout their career, they have collaborated with several researchers, frequently working alongside:

  • Jocelyn L. Aycrigg
  • Adam G. Wells
  • Buck Magipane
  • Glen E. Liston
  • Laura R. Prugh

Their research contributions have been published predominantly in PLoS ONE, which is noted as a frequent venue for their articles.

In terms of academic fields, their principal areas of study include environmental science and earth and planetary sciences. Within these broader fields, they engage deeply with subfields such as ecology and atmospheric science.

Best Publications

  • Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges.

    Jon S. Horne;Edward O. Garton;Stephen M. Krone;Jesse S. Lewis

  • Identifying areas of concentrated use within the home range

    M. D. Samuel;D. J. Pierce;E. O. Garton

  • Effects of habitat on GPS collar performance: using data screening to reduce location error

    Jesse S. Lewis;Janet L. Rachlow;Edward O. Garton;Lee A. Vierling

  • Likelihood Cross-Validation Versus Least Squares Cross-Validation for Choosing the Smoothing Parameter in Kernel Home-Range Analysis

    Jon S. Horne;Edward O. Garton

  • Visibility Bias during Aerial Surveys of Elk in Northcentral Idaho

    Michael D. Samuel;Edward O. Garton;Michael W. Schlegel;Robert G. Carson

  • Contribution of the Natura 2000 Network to Biodiversity Conservation in Italy

    Luigi Maiorano;Luigi Maiorano;Alessandra Falcucci;Alessandra Falcucci;Edward O. Garton;Luigi Boitani

  • The power of genetic monitoring for studying demography, ecology and genetics of a reintroduced brown bear population

    M. De Barba;L. P. Waits;E. O. Garton;P. Genovesi

  • Demographic Response of Mule Deer to Experimental Reduction of Coyotes and Mountain Lions in Southeastern Idaho

    Mark A. Hurley;James W. Unsworth;Peter Zager;Mark Hebblewhite

  • SELECTING THE BEST HOME RANGE MODEL: AN INFORMATION‐THEORETIC APPROACH

    Jon S. Horne;Edward O. Garton

  • Experimental Design for Radiotelemetry Studies

    Edward O. Garton;Michael J. Wisdom;Frederick A. Leban;Bruce K. Johnson

  • A synoptic model of animal space use: Simultaneous estimation of home range, habitat selection, and inter/intra-specific relationships

    Jon S. Horne;Edward O. Garton;Janet L. Rachlow

  • Identifying habitat characteristics to predict highway crossing areas for black bears within a human-modified landscape

    Jesse S. Lewis;Janet L. Rachlow;Jon S. Horne;Edward O. Garton

  • Elk habitat selection on the clearwater national forest, Idaho

    James W. Unsworth;Lonn Kuck;Edward O. Garton;Bart R. Butterfield

  • Ecology of Boreal Owls in the Northern Rocky Mountains, Usa

    Gregory D. Hayward;Patricia H. Hayward;Edward O. Garton

  • A sight ability model for bighorn sheep in canyon habitats

    Walter L. Bodie;Edward O. Garton;Elroy R. Taylor;Matthew McCoy

  • Home range: a weighted normal estimate and tests of underlying assumptions

    Michael D. Samuel;Edward O. Garton

  • Drought, fires, and large mammals

    Francis J. Singer;William Schreier;Jill Oppenheim;Edward O. Garton

  • Sensitivity of species habitat-relationship model performance to factors of scale

    J. W. Karl;P. J. Heglund;E. O. Garton;J. M. Scott

  • ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITY AND DENSITY FROM POINT-COUNT SURVEYS: A COMBINATION OF DISTANCE AND DOUBLE-OBSERVER SAMPLING

    Michelle L. Kissling;Edward O. Garton

  • Elk mortality in the Clearwater drainage of northcentral Idaho

    James W. Unsworth;Lonn Kuck;Michael D. Scott;Edward O. Garton

  • Resource partitioning among forest owls in the River of No Return Wilderness, Idaho

    G. D. Hayward;E. O. Garton

  • Spatial Capture-Recapture

    Edward O. Garton

Frequent Co-Authors

Janet L. Rachlow
Janet L. Rachlow University of Idaho
Kerry P. Reese
Kerry P. Reese University of Idaho
Luigi Maiorano
Luigi Maiorano Sapienza University of Rome
Michael J. Wisdom
Michael J. Wisdom US Forest Service
Christian A. Hagen
Christian A. Hagen Oregon State University
Brian Dennis
Brian Dennis University of Idaho
Douglas H. Johnson
Douglas H. Johnson United States Geological Survey
David E. Naugle
David E. Naugle University of Montana
Luigi Boitani
Luigi Boitani Sapienza University of Rome
Lisette P. Waits
Lisette P. Waits University of Idaho

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring ecology and evolution can open doors to various interdisciplinary careers. Many students consider adjacent fields that leverage their biological expertise, such as speech-language pathology, nursing, or mental health. For example, those intrigued by communication disorders might pursue accredited speech pathology programs—many of which offer flexible online formats while meeting professional certification standards.

If your background isn't in speech-language pathology, enrolling in an slp bridge program online can help you transition into this rewarding field. Similarly, science majors seeking patient care roles may benefit from accelerated nursing programs for non nurses, which provide a path to nursing credentials in a shorter timeframe.

Professionals interested in mental health careers might consider advanced practice roles. Becoming a psychiatric nurse practitioner is an option, and understanding dnp pmhnp salary trends by state can help align your training with potential earnings. Each of these online pathways complements studies in ecology and evolution by expanding your impact in healthcare, research, or education.

Best Scientists Citing Edward O. Garton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles