World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
84
Citations
31754
World Ranking
1374
National Ranking
693

William D. Snider publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William D. Snider sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 134 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

William D. Snider D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William D. Snider sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

William D. Snider is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on neuroscience, with significant contributions to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work covers several subfields including cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, biophysics, developmental neuroscience, and cell biology.

Their frequent publication venues include UNC Libraries, where they have published 30 papers, as well as contributions to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Science Advances, Cerebral Cortex, and Cell Reports.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by William D. Snider include:

  • The biophysical, molecular, and anatomical landscape of pigeon CRY4: A candidate light-based quantal magnetosensor (2020, Science Advances)
  • GSK-3 is a master regulator of neural progenitor homeostasis (2020, UNC Libraries)
  • Hyperactive MEK1 Signaling in Cortical GABAergic Neurons Promotes Embryonic Parvalbumin Neuron Loss and Defects in Behavioral Inhibition (2020, Cerebral Cortex)
  • NuMorph: Tools for cortical cellular phenotyping in tissue-cleared whole-brain images (2021, Cell Reports)
  • Different Signaling Pathways Mediate Regenerative versus Developmental Sensory Axon Growth (2021, UNC Libraries)

Frequent collaborators of William D. Snider include Jason M. Newbern, Xiaoyan Li, Yaohong Wu, Mark J. Zylka, and Woo-Yang Kim.

The main topics covered in their research are:

  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Neuroscience and neuropharmacology research
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Cell image analysis techniques
  • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Advanced fluorescence microscopy techniques

Best Publications

  • Functions of the neurotrophins during nervous system development: What the knockouts are teaching us

    William D. Snider

  • Neurological complications of acquired immune deficiency syndrome: analysis of 50 patients

    William D. Snider;David M. Simpson;Surl Nielsen;W. M. Jonathan Gold;W. M. Jonathan Gold

  • Motor neurons in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase-deficient mice develop normally but exhibit enhanced cell death after axonal injury.

    Andrew. G. Reaume;Jeffrey L. Elliott;Eric K. Hoffman;Neil W. Kowall;Neil W. Kowall

  • BAX is required for neuronal death after trophic factor deprivation and during development

    Thomas L. Deckwerth;Jeffrey L. Elliott;C. Michael Knudson;Eugene M. Johnson

  • Tackling pain at the source: new ideas about nociceptors.

    William D Snider;Stephen B McMahon

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor rescues spinal motor neurons from axotomy-induced cell death

    Qiao Yan;Jeffrey Elliott;William D. Snider

  • IB4-Binding DRG Neurons Switch from NGF to GDNF Dependence in Early Postnatal Life

    D.C Molliver;D.E Wright;M.L Leitner;A.Sh Parsadanian

  • The Laminin α Chains: Expression, Developmental Transitions, and Chromosomal Locations of α1-5, Identification of Heterotrimeric Laminins 8–11, and Cloning of a Novel α3 Isoform

    Jeffrey H. Miner;Bruce L. Patton;Stephen I. Lentz;Debra J. Gilbert

  • Disruption of the neurotrophin-3 receptor gene trkC eliminates la muscle afferents and results in abnormal movements

    Rüdiger Klein;Inmaculada Silos-Santiago;Richard J. Smeyne;Sergio A. Lira

  • NGF-Induced Axon Growth Is Mediated by Localized Inactivation of GSK-3β and Functions of the Microtubule Plus End Binding Protein APC

    Feng Quan Zhou;Jiang Zhou;Shoukat Dedhar;Yao Hong Wu

  • GFRα1-Deficient Mice Have Deficits in the Enteric Nervous System and Kidneys

    Hideki Enomoto;Toshiyuki Araki;Alana Jackman;Robert O Heuckeroth

  • Restricted Expression of G86R Cu/Zn Superoxide Dismutase in Astrocytes Results in Astrocytosis But Does Not Cause Motoneuron Degeneration

    Yun H. Gong;Alexander S. Parsadanian;Albina Andreeva;William D. Snider

  • Development of Sensory Neurons in the Absence of NGF/TrkA Signaling In Vivo

    Tushar D. Patel;Alana Jackman;Frank L. Rice;Jan Kucera

  • Widespread elimination of naturally occurring neuronal death in Bax-deficient mice.

    Fletcher A. White;Cynthia R. Keller-Peck;C. Michael Knudson;Stanley J. Korsmeyer

  • Trophic regulation of nerve cell morphology and innervation in the autonomic nervous system

    Dale Purves;William D. Snider;James T. Voyvodic

  • PDGF A-chain gene is expressed by mammalian neurons during development and in maturity.

    Hsiu Jeng Yeh;Kenneth G. Ruit;Ya Xian Wang;Ya Xian Wang;William C. Parks

  • Raf and Akt Mediate Distinct Aspects of Sensory Axon Growth

    Annette Markus;Jian Zhong;William D. Snider

  • Neurotrophin receptor genes are expressed in distinct patterns in developing dorsal root ganglia

    Xiaojun Mu;Inmaculada Silos-Santiago;Steven L. Carroll;William D. Snider

  • Neurotrophic factors and axonal growth

    Annette Markus;Tushar D Patel;William D Snider

  • GSK-3 is a master regulator of neural progenitor homeostasis.

    Woo Yang Kim;Xinshuo Wang;Yaohong Wu;Bradley W. Doble

  • Gene Targeting Reveals a Critical Role for Neurturin in the Development and Maintenance of Enteric, Sensory, and Parasympathetic Neurons

    Robert O Heuckeroth;Hideki Enomoto;John R Grider;Judith P Golden

Frequent Co-Authors

Fletcher A. White
Fletcher A. White Indiana University
Stephen B. McMahon
Stephen B. McMahon King's College London
Dale Purves
Dale Purves Duke University
Jeff W. Lichtman
Jeff W. Lichtman Harvard University
Joshua R. Sanes
Joshua R. Sanes Harvard University
Hideki Enomoto
Hideki Enomoto Kobe University
Robert J. Ferrante
Robert J. Ferrante Boston University
Debra J. Gilbert
Debra J. Gilbert National Institutes of Health
Neal G. Copeland
Neal G. Copeland The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Nancy A. Jenkins
Nancy A. Jenkins The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in neuroscience opens up a wide range of related fields and online study options. If you are interested in the clinical or psychological side, pursuing psyd online programs is a strong pathway for those seeking a career as a clinical psychologist. Likewise, programs such as the mft program offer a direct route into marriage and family therapy, a field that often overlaps with neuropsychological approaches.

For students eager to accelerate their studies, there are 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees available online. These can fast-track your entry into neuroscience-related careers or postgraduate opportunities. Considering your long-term prospects? When comparing educational investments, it’s useful to examine the most valuable degree in the world for guidance on potential salaries and demand in related sectors.

Researching these pathways helps you match your interests and goals with flexible, respected, and career-focused online programs.

Best Scientists Citing William D. Snider

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles