World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
8865
World Ranking
5555
National Ranking
32

Eduard Auff publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eduard Auff sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 201 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Eduard Auff D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eduard Auff sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eduard Auff is affiliated with the Medical University of Vienna in Austria. Their research is focused primarily within the field of Medicine, with notable contributions to several subfields including Neurology, Epidemiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Internal Medicine, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

Their scholarly work spans a range of clinical and neurological topics. Major themes in their research include:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
  • Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research

Eduard Auff has published articles in peer-reviewed journals such as the Journal of Neurology and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Some of the key recent papers are:

  • Time trends in stroke severity in the years 2005 to 2020: results from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry, 2022, Journal of Neurology
  • Cognitive Performance After Facial Botulinum Toxin Treatment in a Cohort of Neurologic Patients: An Exploratory Study, 2021, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

The researcher collaborates frequently with experts including Thomas Gattringer, Stefan Kiechl, Alexandra Bernegger, Dominika Mikšová, and Alexandra Posekany. Collaboration counts indicate multiple shared publications, particularly with Gattringer and Kiechl.

Eduard Auff's work integrates clinical neurology with epidemiological approaches to address both acute and chronic neurological conditions. Their contributions to stroke management and neurotoxin-related neurological dysfunctions highlight interdisciplinary application across neurology and internal medicine.

Best Publications

  • A Mutation in VPS35, Encoding a Subunit of the Retromer Complex, Causes Late-Onset Parkinson Disease

    Alexander Zimprich;Anna Benet-Pagès;Walter Struhal;Elisabeth Graf

  • Slow expansion of multiple sclerosis iron rim lesions: pathology and 7 T magnetic resonance imaging.

    Assunta Dal-Bianco;Günther Grabner;Claudia Kronnerwetter;Michael Weber

  • Double-blind trial of botulinum A toxin for the treatment of focal hyperhidrosis of the palms

    P. Schnider;M. Binder;E. Auff;H. Kittler

  • Variant in the sequence of the LINGO1 gene confers risk of essential tremor.

    Hreinn Stefansson;Stacy Steinberg;Hjorvar Petursson;Omar Gustafsson

  • Normal IPT and IBZM SPECT in drug-naive and levodopa-treated idiopathic restless legs syndrome

    I. Eisensehr;T. C. Wetter;R. Linke;S. Noachtar

  • Long-term antidyskinetic efficacy of amantadine in Parkinson's disease

    Elisabeth Wolf;Klaus Seppi;Regina Katzenschlager;Guenter Hochschorner

  • Neurological rehabilitation of severely disabled cardiac arrest survivors. Part II. Life situation of patients and families after treatment

    Gisela Pußwald;Elisabeth Fertl;Margit Faltl;Eduard Auff

  • Circadian secretion pattern of melatonin in de novo parkinsonian patients: evidence for phase-shifting properties of l-dopa

    E. Fertl;E. Auff;A. Doppelbauer;F. Waldhauser

  • A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study on analgesic effects of botulinum toxin A.

    B. Voller;T. Sycha;B. Gustorff;L. Schmetterer

  • Botulinum toxin in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon: a pilot study

    T. Sycha;M. Graninger;E. Auff;P. Schnider

  • Inclusion body myopathy and Paget disease is linked to a novel mutation in the VCP gene

    D. Haubenberger;R. E. Bittner;S. Rauch-Shorny;F. Zimprich

  • Neuropsychological, MRI and EEG findings after very mild traumatic brain injury.

    B Voller;T Benke;K Benedetto;P Schnider

  • Sleep disorders and depression in patients with Parkinson's disease.

    S. Happe;B. Schrödl;M. Faltl;C. Müller

  • Awareness of memory deficits in subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.

    Johann Lehrner;Sandra Kogler;Claus Lamm;Doris Moser

  • Relation between depression and anxiety in dystonic patients: implications for clinical management.

    E. Moraru;P. Schnider;A. Wimmer;T. Wenzel

  • Treatment of focal hyperhidrosis with botulinum toxin type A: long-term follow-up in 61 patients.

    P. Schnider;E. Moraru;H. Kittler;M. Binder

  • Impairment of motor planning in patients with Parkinson's disease: evidence from ideomotor apraxia testing.

    G Goldenberg;A Wimmer;E Auff;G Schnaberth

  • Efficacy and safety of a standardised 500 unit dose of Dysport (clostridium botulinum toxin type A haemaglutinin complex) in a heterogeneous cervical dystonia population: results of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study.

    J. Wissel;P. Kanovsky;E. Ruzicka;M. Bares

  • Circadian secretion pattern of melatonin in Parkinson's disease.

    E Fertl;E Auff;A Doppelbauer;F Waldhauser

  • Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Subjective Cognitive Decline and Mild Cognitive Impairment and its Relation to Activities of Daily Living.

    Gisela Pusswald;Elisa Tropper;Ilse Kryspin-Exner;Doris Moser

  • Association of transcription factor polymorphisms PITX3 and EN1 with Parkinson's disease

    Dietrich Haubenberger;Eva Reinthaler;Jakob C. Mueller;Walter Pirker

  • Neurological monitoring of neurotoxicity induced by paclitaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy

    T. Berger;R. Malayer;A. Doppelbauer;G. Krajnik

Frequent Co-Authors

Siegfried Trattnig
Siegfried Trattnig Medical University of Vienna
Alexander Zimprich
Alexander Zimprich Medical University of Vienna
Georg S. Kranz
Georg S. Kranz Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Werner Poewe
Werner Poewe Innsbruck Medical University
Josef Zeitlhofer
Josef Zeitlhofer Medical University of Vienna
Gabor G. Kovacs
Gabor G. Kovacs University of Toronto
Claus Lamm
Claus Lamm University of Vienna
Martin Kronbichler
Martin Kronbichler University of Salzburg
Peter Lichtner
Peter Lichtner Technical University of Munich
Thomas Meitinger
Thomas Meitinger Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways—in both clinical and research-focused roles. Those interested in the health and caring professions often pursue online MSW programs, which offer a fast, flexible way to obtain a Master of Social Work and prepare for roles supporting mental health in diverse communities.

Psychology remains a top choice for students looking to understand the mind and behavior. Many opt for a fastest online psychology degree to jumpstart their careers in counseling, research, or education. Similarly, for those who aim to become licensed counselors, choosing a CACREP online masters in counseling ensures a curriculum that meets industry standards and job readiness.

If you're considering entry-level roles or a stepping stone to graduate study, a counseling bachelor's degree online provides affordable and flexible options. Each of these pathways can complement your neuroscience studies and expand your career opportunities in healthcare, education, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Eduard Auff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles