World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
5541
World Ranking
12550
National Ranking
437

Edoardo Amaldi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edoardo Amaldi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 132 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Edoardo Amaldi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edoardo Amaldi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1962 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Edoardo Amaldi is affiliated with the Polytechnic University of Milan in Italy. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Computer Science and Engineering. Within these domains, their work extensively covers subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their main research topics include Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Machine Learning and Data Classification, Optimal Power Flow Distribution, Smart Grid Energy Management, Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems, IoT and Edge/Fog Computing, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI).

Amaldi has contributed to various recent publications in reputable scientific venues. Notable papers include:

  • "Optimal Feeder Routing in Urban Distribution Networks Planning with Layout Constraints and Losses," 2020, Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy
  • "A GIS-based approach for high-level distribution networks expansion planning in normal and contingency operation considering reliability," 2020, Electric Power Systems Research
  • "A Shallow Neural Network Approach for the Short-Term Forecast of Hourly Energy Consumption," 2022, Energies
  • "A local search method for costly black-box problems and its application to CSP plant start-up optimization refinement," 2020, Optimization and Engineering
  • "ANDREAS: Artificial intelligence traiNing scheDuler for accElerAted resource clusterS," 2021, BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Amaldi include:

  • Andrea Manno
  • Antonio Consolo
  • Federica Filippini
  • Danilo Ardagna
  • Marco Lattuada

The researcher's outputs have been published in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), the Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, Electric Power Systems Research, and Energies.

Among distinctions, Amaldi was recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1962.

Best Publications

  • On the approximability of minimizing nonzero variables or unsatisfied relations in linear systems

    Edoardo Amaldi;Viggo Kann

  • Planning UMTS base station location: optimization models with power control and algorithms

    E. Amaldi;A. Capone;F. Malucelli

  • A detailed MILP optimization model for combined cooling, heat and power system operation planning

    Aldo Bischi;Leonardo Taccari;Emanuele Martelli;Edoardo Amaldi

  • Optimization models and methods for planning wireless mesh networks

    E. Amaldi;A. Capone;M. Cesana;I. Filippini

  • The complexity and approximability of finding maximum feasible subsystems of linear relations

    Edoardo Amaldi;Viggo Kann

  • Radio planning and coverage optimization of 3G cellular networks

    Edoardo Amaldi;Antonio Capone;Federico Malucelli

  • On the computational complexity of the virtual network embedding problem

    Edoardo Amaldi;Stefano Coniglio;Arie M.C.A. Koster;Martin Tieves

  • Computing optical flow across multiple scales: an adaptive coarse-to-fine strategy

    Roberto Battiti;Edoardo Amaldi;Christof Koch

  • Provisioning virtual private networks under traffic uncertainty

    A. Altın;E. Amaldi;P. Belotti;M. Ç. Pınar

  • Provisioning virtual private networks under traffic uncertainty

    Unknown

  • Optimization models and algorithms for downlink UMTS radio planning

    E. Amaldi;A. Capone;F. Malucelli;F. Signori

  • Energy-aware IP traffic engineering with shortest path routing

    E. Amaldi;A. Capone;L. G. Gianoli

  • UMTS radio planning: optimizing base station configuration

    E. Amaldi;A. Capone;F. Malucelli;F. Signori

  • On the Maximum Feasible Subsystem Problem, IISs and IIS-hypergraphs

    Edoardo Amaldi;Marc E. Pfetsch;Leslie E. Trotter

  • WLAN coverage planning: optimization models and algorithms

    E. Amaldi;A. Capone;M. Cesana;F. Malucelli

  • Optimizing base station siting in UMTS networks

    E. Amaldi;A. Capone;F. Malucelli

  • Optimizing WLAN radio coverage

    E. Amaldi;A. Capone;M. Cesana;F. Malucelli

  • Optimization problems and models for planning cellular networks

    Edoardo Amaldi;Antonio Capone;Federico Malucelli;Carlo Mannino

  • PGS-COM: A hybrid method for constrained non-smooth black-box optimization problems: Brief review, novel algorithm and comparative evaluation

    Emanuele Martelli;Edoardo Amaldi

  • A rolling-horizon optimization algorithm for the long term operational scheduling of cogeneration systems

    Aldo Bischi;Leonardo Taccari;Emanuele Martelli;Edoardo Amaldi

  • Optimizing base station location and configuration in UMTS networks

    Edoardo Amaldi;Pietro Belotti;Antonio Capone;Federico Malucelli

  • Energy management in IP traffic engineering with Shortest Path routing

    Edoardo Amaldi;Antonio Capone;Luca G. Gianoli;Luca Mascetti

  • Improved models and algorithms for UMTS radio planning

    E. Amaldi;A. Capone;F. Malucelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Capone
Antonio Capone Polytechnic University of Milan
Emanuele Martelli
Emanuele Martelli Polytechnic University of Milan
Matteo Cesana
Matteo Cesana Polytechnic University of Milan
Leo Liberti
Leo Liberti École Polytechnique
Danilo Ardagna
Danilo Ardagna Polytechnic University of Milan
Ennio Macchi
Ennio Macchi Polytechnic University of Milan
Stefano Campanari
Stefano Campanari Polytechnic University of Milan
Giampaolo Manzolini
Giampaolo Manzolini Polytechnic University of Milan
Di Yuan
Di Yuan Uppsala University
Luigi Fratta
Luigi Fratta Polytechnic University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology evolves, students interested in Computer Science have more flexible study options than ever before. Online degrees and certification programs now offer a variety of ways to launch or advance your tech career without traditional, lengthy classroom commitments.

For those looking to enter the workforce quickly, exploring 3-month certificate programs that pay well can be a smart first step. These programs often focus on in-demand skills and practical knowledge tailored for rapid employment.

If you want to fast-track your advanced education, the quickest online masters degree options can help you gain a competitive edge in less time than traditional programs. For those considering a significant long-term investment, researching the best masters degree to get in the tech field can lead to roles with high earning potential and job security.

Finally, those at the beginning of their educational journey may find associates degrees online an accessible way to develop foundational knowledge before pursuing further studies or certifications.

Best Scientists Citing Edoardo Amaldi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles