World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Arie M. C. A. Koster

Arie M. C. A. Koster

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
4535
World Ranking
14005
National Ranking
678

Arie M. C. A. Koster publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arie M. C. A. Koster sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 154 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Arie M. C. A. Koster D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arie M. C. A. Koster sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arie M. C. A. Koster is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany. Their research predominantly focuses on optimization problems in operations research, with a strong emphasis on robust and combinatorial optimization techniques.

The scientist's recent publications highlight various aspects of robust optimization and project scheduling. Notable papers include:

  • Γ-robust optimization of project scheduling problems, 2023, published in Computers & Operations Research
  • A branch and bound algorithm for robust binary optimization with budget uncertainty, 2023, published in Mathematical Programming Computation
  • Robust minimum cost flow problem under consistent flow constraints, 2021, published in Annals of Operations Research
  • Benchmark Instances for Robust Combinatorial Optimization with Budgeted Uncertainty, 2022, published in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Decision-support systems for ambulatory care, including pandemic requirements: using mathematically optimized solutions, 2022, published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Arie M. C. A. Koster include:

  • Christina Büsing
  • Timo Gersing
  • Jenny Segschneider
  • Michaela Hiller
  • Sabrina Schmitz

Their work has been published in various venues, including:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Discrete Applied Mathematics
  • Networks
  • Mathematical Programming Computation
  • Annals of Operations Research

Arie M. C. A. Koster's research spans multiple subfields of study such as:

  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Their principal research topics cover areas including:

  • Risk and Portfolio Optimization
  • Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
  • Facility Location and Emergency Management
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Optimization and Mathematical Programming
  • Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions
  • Data Management and Algorithms

Best Publications

  • Models and Solution Techniques for Frequency Assignment Problems

    Karen I. Aardal;Stan P. M. van Hoesel;Arie M. C. A. Koster;Carlo Mannino

  • Models and solution techniques for frequency assignment problems

    Karen I. Aardal;Stan P. M. van Hoesel;Arie M. C. A. Koster;Carlo Mannino

  • Combinatorial Optimization on Graphs of Bounded Treewidth

    Hans L. Bodlaender;Arie M. C. A. Koster

  • Treewidth computations I. Upper bounds

    Hans L. Bodlaender;Arie M. C. A. Koster

  • Frequency assignment : models and algorithms

    Arie M. C. A. Koster

  • On the computational complexity of the virtual network embedding problem

    Edoardo Amaldi;Stefano Coniglio;Arie M.C.A. Koster;Martin Tieves

  • Treewidth: Computational Experiments

    Arie M. C.A. Koster;Hans L. Bodlaender;Stan P.M. van Hoesel

  • Frequency Planning and Ramifications of Coloring

    Andreas Eisenblätter;Martin Grötschel;Arie M.C.A. Koster

  • On cut-based inequalities for capacitated network design polyhedra

    Christian Raack;Arie M. C. A. Koster;Sebastian Orlowski;Roland Wessäly

  • The partial constraint satisfaction problem: Facets and lifting theorems

    Arie M. C. A. Koster;Stan P. M. Van Hoesel;Antoon W. J. Kolen

  • Safe separators for treewidth

    Hans L. Bodlaender;Arie M. C. A. Koster

  • Robust network design: Formulations, valid inequalities, and computations

    Arie M.C.A. Koster;Manuel Kutschka;Christian Raack

  • Treewidth computations II. Lower bounds

    Hans L. Bodlaender;Arie M. C. A. Koster

  • Demand-wise Shared Protection for Meshed Optical Networks

    Arie M. Koster;Adrian Zymolka;Monika Jäger;Ralf Hülsermann

  • Network planning under demand uncertainty with robust optimization

    Thomas Bauschert;Christina Büsing;Fabio D'Andreagiovanni;Arie C. A. Koster

  • Branch and Tree Decomposition Techniques for Discrete Optimization

    Illya V. Hicks;Arie M. C. A. Koster;Elif Koloto ˘ glu

  • Modelling Feasible Network Configurations for UMTS

    Andreas Eisenblätter;Roland Wessäly;Alexander Martin;Armin Fügenschuh

  • Solving partial constraint satisfaction problems with tree decomposition

    Arie M. C. A. Koster;Stan P. M. van Hoesel;Antoon W. J. Kolen

  • On exact algorithms for treewidth

    Hans L. Bodlaender;Fedor V. Fomin;Arie M. C. A. Koster;Dieter Kratsch

  • PREPROCESSING RULES FOR TRIANGULATION OF PROBABILISTIC NETWORKS

    Hans L. Bodlaender;Arie M.C.A. Koster;Frank van den Eijkhof

  • Treewidth Lower Bounds with Brambles

    Hans L. Bodlaender;Alexander Grigoriev;Arie M. C. A. Koster

  • A Note on Exact Algorithms for Vertex Ordering Problems on Graphs

    Hans L. Bodlaender;Fedor V. Fomin;Arie M. C. A. Koster;Dieter Kratsch

  • Contraction and Treewidth Lower Bounds

    Hans L. Bodlaender;Thomas Wolle;Arie M. C. A. Koster

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans L. Bodlaender
Hans L. Bodlaender Utrecht University
Anke Schmeink
Anke Schmeink RWTH Aachen University
André Bardow
André Bardow ETH Zurich
Dimitrios M. Thilikos
Dimitrios M. Thilikos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Dieter Kratsch
Dieter Kratsch University of Lorraine
Fedor V. Fomin
Fedor V. Fomin University of Bergen
Martin W. P. Savelsbergh
Martin W. P. Savelsbergh Georgia Institute of Technology
Di Yuan
Di Yuan Uppsala University
Berthold Vöcking
Berthold Vöcking RWTH Aachen University
Alex Martin
Alex Martin National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your computer science studies in the USA opens numerous career pathways, both on campus and online. Many students explore related fields such as electrical engineering—an area closely connected to tech innovation. If you’re interested in this direction, check out the top online electrical engineering schools for flexible and reputable degree options.

Earning certifications for jobs is a quick way to boost your credentials and improve job prospects. Many tech certifications require less time than a degree and can qualify you for well-paying positions in IT, networking, and software development.

For those looking to advance quickly, consider the shortest masters degree pathways, which let you earn a graduate credential in a fraction of the usual time. Before you decide, review the best masters degree to get for your career goals, as these programs tend to offer strong job placement and salary potential.

Best Scientists Citing Arie M. C. A. Koster

Trending Scientists