World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 47 3393 3125 1638 1485 139 9318

Diana C. Parra publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Diana C. Parra between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Diana C. Parra published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2010. 5 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2010. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 21 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 13 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
2004 2025

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Diana C. Parra: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 4
2007 2
2008 2
2009 1
2010 21
2011 8
2012 16
2013 11
2014 13
2015 17
2016 7
2017 10
2018 6
2019 8
2020 6
2021 9
2022 1
2023 13
2024 4
2025 1
Total 162
Download as CSV

Diana C. Parra publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana C. Parra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 139 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 139
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Diana C. Parra D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana C. Parra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251 47
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Diana C. Parra is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Medicine, Psychology, and Health Professions. The subfields in which their work is concentrated include Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Transportation, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's research addresses a variety of topics, with a strong focus on obesity, physical activity, and diet. Other significant themes include health and lifestyle studies, urban transport and accessibility, mindfulness and compassion interventions, music therapy and health, global public health policies and epidemiology, and children's physical and motor development.

Diana C. Parra has contributed to multiple publication venues, frequently appearing in:

  • Obesity Reviews
  • Mindfulness
  • Revista de Saúde Pública
  • Journal of Transport & Health
  • Obesity

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Diana C. Parra include:

  • Sociodemographic factors associated with the consumption of ultra-processed foods in Colombia (2020) Revista de Saúde Pública
  • Mind the gap: Gender differences in walkability, transportation and physical activity in urban India (2020) Journal of Transport & Health
  • Building a More Diverse and Inclusive Science: Mindfulness-Based Approaches for Latinx Individuals (2022) Mindfulness
  • Capacity for childhood obesity research in Latin American and US Latino populations: State of the field, challenges, opportunities, and future directions (2021) Obesity Reviews
  • Effectiveness of a Gamification Strategy to Prevent Childhood Obesity in Schools: A Cluster Controlled Trial (2021) Obesity

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Deborah Salvo
  • Alejandra Jáuregui
  • Nicolás Aguilar-Farías
  • Adriano Akira Ferreira Hino
  • Uriyoán Colón-Ramos

Best Publications

  • Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world

    Gregory W Heath;Diana C Parra;Olga L Sarmiento;Lars Bo Andersen;Lars Bo Andersen

  • NOVA. The star shines bright

    Carlos A Monteiro;Geoffrey Cannon;Renata Levy;Jean-Claude Moubarac

  • Food Classification Systems Based on Food Processing: Significance and Implications for Policies and Actions: A Systematic Literature Review and Assessment

    Jean-Claude Moubarac;Diana C. Parra;Diana C. Parra;Geoffrey Cannon;Carlos A. Monteiro

  • Lessons Learned After 10 Years of IPAQ Use in Brazil and Colombia

    Pedro Rodrigues Curi Hallal;Luis Fernando Gomez;Diana C Parra;Felipe Lobelo

  • Perceived and objective neighborhood environment attributes and health related quality of life among the elderly in Bogotá, Colombia.

    Diana C. Parra;Luis F. Gomez;Olga L. Sarmiento;David M Buchner

  • Built environment attributes and walking patterns among the elderly population in Bogotá

    Luis Fernando Gomez;Diana C Parra;David Buchner;Ross C Brownson

  • Perceived environmental correlates of physical activity for leisure and transportation in Curitiba, Brazil

    Diana C. Parra;Christine M. Hoehner;Pedro C. Hallal;Isabela C. Ribeiro

  • Assessing Physical Activity in Public Parks in Brazil Using Systematic Observation

    Diana C. Parra;Thomas L. McKenzie;Isabela C. Ribeiro;Adriano Akira Ferreira Hino

  • The built environment and recreational physical activity among adults in Curitiba, Brazil.

    Adriano A.F. Hino;Rodrigo S. Reis;Rodrigo S. Reis;Olga L. Sarmiento;Diana C. Parra

  • Characteristics of the Built Environment Associated With Leisure-Time Physical Activity Among Adults in Bogotá, Colombia: A Multilevel Study

    Luis Fernando Gomez;Olga L. Sarmiento;Diana C. Parra;Thomas L. Schmid

  • Advertising of ultra-processed foods and beverages: children as a vulnerable population

    Christina Mallarino;Luis F Gómez;Laura González-Zapata;Yazmín Cadena

  • Promoting Physical Activity Through Community-Wide Policies and Planning: Findings From Curitiba, Brazil

    Rodrigo S. Reis;Pedro C. Hallal;Diana C. Parra;Isabela C. Ribeiro

  • Physical activity interventions in Latin America: expanding and classifying the evidence.

    Christine M. Hoehner;Isabela C. Ribeiro;Diana C. Parra;Rodrigo S. Reis;Rodrigo S. Reis

  • Association between perceived environmental attributes and physical activity among adults in Recife, Brazil.

    Pedro C. Hallal;Rodrigo S. Reis;Diana C. Parra;Christine Hoehner

  • The shift of obesity burden by socioeconomic status between 1998 and 2017 in Latin America and the Caribbean: a cross-sectional series study

    Safia S Jiwani;Safia S Jiwani;Rodrigo M Carrillo-Larco;Rodrigo M Carrillo-Larco;Akram Hernández-Vásquez;Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutiérrez

  • Relationships between consumption of ultra-processed foods, gestational weight gain and neonatal outcomes in a sample of US pregnant women

    Karthik W. Rohatgi;Rachel A. Tinius;W. Todd Cade;Euridice Martínez Steele

  • Health promoting practices and personal lifestyle behaviors of Brazilian health professionals

    Karen D Hidalgo;Gregore Iven Mielke;Diana Celmira Parra;Felipe Lobelo

  • Walking for leisure among adults from three Brazilian cities and its association with perceived environment attributes and personal factors

    Grace Angélica de Oliveira Gomes;Rodrigo S. Reis;Diana C. Parra;Isabela Ribeiro

  • Lecciones aprendidas después de 10 Años del uso de IPAQ en Brasil y Colombia

    Pedro C. Hallal;Luis Fernando Gómez;Diana C. Parra;Felipe Lobelo

  • Quality of life, physical activity, and built environment characteristics among colombian adults.

    Olga L. Sarmiento;Thomas L. Schmid;Diana C. Parra;Adriana Díaz-del-Castillo

  • Using observational methods to evaluate public open spaces and physical activity in Brazil.

    Adriano Akira Ferreira Hino;Rodrigo S. Reis;Isabela C. Ribeiro;Diana C. Parra

Frequent Co-Authors

Ross C. Brownson
Ross C. Brownson Washington University in St. Louis
Rodrigo Siqueira Reis
Rodrigo Siqueira Reis Washington University in St. Louis
Michael Pratt
Michael Pratt University of California, San Diego
Pedro Curi Hallal
Pedro Curi Hallal University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Deborah Carvalho Malta
Deborah Carvalho Malta Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Carlos Augusto Monteiro
Carlos Augusto Monteiro Universidade de São Paulo
Andrew A. Pieper
Andrew A. Pieper University of Iowa
Eric A. F. Simões
Eric A. F. Simões University of Colorado Denver
Neville Owen
Neville Owen Swinburne University of Technology
Lars Bo Andersen
Lars Bo Andersen University of Bergen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse academic and professional opportunities. Many students are now seeking flexible options, such as 1 year masters programs, to fast-track their career advancement.

For those who wish to earn their bachelor’s degree quickly, online accelerated programs offer a way to graduate sooner and enter the workforce or continue with advanced studies.

If your interests include social work, there are online msw programs affordable enough to make graduate education accessible without a heavy financial burden. These programs build professional skills for careers in social service, counseling, and advocacy.

Additionally, aspiring behavioral analysts can find bcba online masters programs that meet certification requirements and foster expertise in behavioral health.

Choosing the right online degree can accelerate your journey in Social Sciences and Humanities while balancing your career goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Diana C. Parra

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles