World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
5386
World Ranking
10175
National Ranking
5359

Debra A. Zellner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Debra A. Zellner sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 55 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Debra A. Zellner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Debra A. Zellner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Debra A. Zellner is affiliated with Montclair State University in the United States. Their recent scholarly contributions span topics in psychology and the arts, with a focus on food acceptance and artistic remembrances.

Their recent papers include:

  • Adult's Mental Representations of Foods and Vegetable Categorization are Predictive of Food Acceptance., 2022, published in Appetite
  • Remembrances of Paul Locher, 2024, published in Empirical Studies of the Arts

Zellner collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Abigail Pickard
  • Jérémie Lafraire
  • Anjan Chatterjee
  • Helmut Leder
  • Marcos Nadal

Their work has been published in venues such as:

  • Appetite
  • Empirical Studies of the Arts

Best Publications

  • Food selection changes under stress

    Debra A. Zellner;Susan Loaiza;Zuleyma Gonzalez;Jaclyn Pita

  • Conditioned enhancement of human's liking for flavor by pairing with sweetness.

    Debra A Zellner;Paul Rozin;Michael Aron;Carol Kulish

  • Color affects perceived odor intensity.

    Debra A. Zellner;Mary A. Kautz

  • Influence of color on odor identification and liking ratings.

    Debra A. Zellner;Angela M. Bartoli;Robert Eckard

  • The Role of Pavlovian Conditioning in the Acquisition of Food Likes and Dislikes

    Paul Rozin;Debra Zellner

  • Food liking and craving: A cross-cultural approach.

    Debra Zellner;A. Garriga-Trillo;E. Rohm;S. Centeno

  • Figure Preferences in Two Generations of Men: The Use of Figure Drawings Illustrating Differences in Muscle Mass

    Shawn M. Lynch;Debra A. Zellner

  • It tastes as good as it looks! The effect of food presentation on liking for the flavor of food.

    Debra A. Zellner;Christopher R. Loss;Jonathan Zearfoss;Sergio Remolina

  • Nobody's Satisfied: Effects of Abnormal Eating Behaviors and Actual and Perceived Weight Status on Body Image Satisfaction in Males and Females

    Bryan Raudenbush;Debra A. Zellner

  • Effect of color on expected and experienced refreshment, intensity, and liking of beverages.

    Debra A. Zellner;Paula Durlach

  • The effect of stress on men's food selection.

    Debra A. Zellner;Shin Saito;Johanie Gonzalez

  • Effect of temperature and expectations on liking for beverages.

    D.A. Zellner;W.F. Stewart;P. Rozin;J.M. Brown

  • Effects of eating abnormalities and gender on perceptions of desirable body shape.

    Debra A. Zellner;Debra E. Harner;Robbie L. Adler

  • Art on the plate: Effect of balance and color on attractiveness of, willingness to try and liking for food

    Debra A. Zellner;Mia Lankford;Lisa Ambrose;Paul Locher

  • The effect of color intensity and appropriateness on color-induced odor enhancement.

    Debra A. Zellner;Lori A. Whitten

  • Chocolate craving and the menstrual cycle.

    Debra A Zellner;Ana Garriga-Trillo;Soraya Centeno;Elizabeth Wadsworth

  • Neatness counts. How plating affects liking for the taste of food.

    Debra A. Zellner;Evan Siemers;Vincenzo Teran;Rebecca Conroy

  • Compared to what? Effects of categorization on hedonic contrast

    Debra A. Zellner;Elizabeth A. Rohm;Terri L. Bassetti;Scott Parker

  • Disconfirmed hedonic expectations produce perceptual contrast, not assimilation.

    Debra A. Zellner;Dinah Strickhouser;Carina E.Tornow

  • What is refreshing? An investigation of the color and other sensory attributes of refreshing foods and beverages.

    D.A. Zellner;P. Durlach

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony L. Riley
Anthony L. Riley American University
Paul Rozin
Paul Rozin University of Pennsylvania
Kent C. Berridge
Kent C. Berridge University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Armand V. Cardello
Armand V. Cardello United States Department of the Army

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to several diverse and rewarding career pathways, including roles in mental health counseling, human resources, education, and more specialized fields such as speech-language pathology.

For those interested in speech-language pathology, each U.S. state has specific certification requirements. For example, the Montana slp certification requirements outline the required education, supervised clinical hours, and examination. Similarly, slp requirements in Nebraska detail state-specific steps including licensure and continuing education.

Students considering where to practice should also review the Nevada speech pathologist certification requirements, as they may differ regarding prerequisite degrees and clinical experience. Meanwhile, the New Hampshire speech pathologist certification requirements provide guidance for those seeking licensure in New England.

Whether you’re interested in direct client care or broader roles within the psychology field, understanding these certification pathways is crucial. Online degree programs can offer the flexibility and curriculum needed to meet these varied requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Debra A. Zellner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles