World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David Taylor-Robinson

David Taylor-Robinson

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 74 1566 1419 133 126 513 21356

David Taylor-Robinson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Taylor-Robinson between 1960 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Taylor-Robinson published across 66 years, from 1960 to 2025, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 1988. 3 of the 570 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1960 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 1988. 1960: 1 publication 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 5 publications 1964: 3 publications 1965: 5 publications 1966: 6 publications 1967: 7 publications 1968: 5 publications 1969: 7 publications 1970: 6 publications 1971: 5 publications 1972: 6 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 9 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 8 publications 1977: 13 publications 1978: 10 publications 1979: 11 publications 1980: 15 publications 1981: 11 publications 1982: 10 publications 1983: 17 publications 1984: 17 publications 1985: 15 publications 1986: 17 publications 1987: 22 publications 1988: 24 publications 1989: 20 publications 1990: 21 publications 1991: 17 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 21 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 22 publications 1997: 22 publications 1998: 16 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 2 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 4 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1960 2025

570 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Taylor-Robinson: publications per year, 1960 to 2025
Year Publications
1960 1
1961 0
1962 0
1963 5
1964 3
1965 5
1966 6
1967 7
1968 5
1969 7
1970 6
1971 5
1972 6
1973 3
1974 9
1975 3
1976 8
1977 13
1978 10
1979 11
1980 15
1981 11
1982 10
1983 17
1984 17
1985 15
1986 17
1987 22
1988 24
1989 20
1990 21
1991 17
1992 11
1993 21
1994 14
1995 13
1996 22
1997 22
1998 16
1999 11
2000 17
2001 13
2002 8
2003 5
2004 4
2005 16
2006 3
2007 4
2008 7
2009 5
2010 6
2011 3
2012 5
2013 2
2014 1
2015 2
2016 1
2017 4
2018 1
2019 2
2020 5
2021 2
2022 2
2023 0
2024 2
2025 1
Total 570
Download as CSV

David Taylor-Robinson publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Taylor-Robinson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 505–514 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 513 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17 513
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

David Taylor-Robinson D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Taylor-Robinson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80 74
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

David Taylor-Robinson is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several areas within health professions, medicine, and social sciences, with an emphasis on public health and social determinants of health.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Health Professions
  • Medicine
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, notable subfields of study covered by their work are:

  • General Health Professions
  • Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Their research topics show a focus on population health and social issues related to well-being. Key topics include:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations

Among the recent papers contributed to, the following stand out for their publication year and venue:

  • Trajectories of childhood adversity and mortality in early adulthood: a population-based cohort study (2020), The Lancet
  • Poverty, health, and covid-19 (2021), BMJ
  • Effects on mental health of a UK welfare reform, Universal Credit: a longitudinal controlled study (2020), The Lancet Public Health
  • Local government funding and life expectancy in England: a longitudinal ecological study (2021), The Lancet Public Health
  • How does vulnerability to COVID-19 vary between communities in England? Developing a Small Area Vulnerability Index (SAVI) (2021), Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Ben Barr
  • Daniela K Schlüter
  • Davara Bennett
  • Kate Mason
  • Alexandros Alexiou

David Taylor-Robinson has published extensively in key venues such as:

  • SSM Annual Scientific Meeting
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Journal of Public Health
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

Best Publications

  • Abnormal bacterial colonisation of the genital tract and subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage

    P E Hay;R F Lamont;D Taylor-Robinson;D J Morgan

  • Immunological events in regressing genital warts.

    Nicholas Coleman;Humphrey D.L. Birley;Adrian M. Renton;Nashat F. Hanna

  • Mycoplasma genitalium: from Chrysalis to Multicolored Butterfly

    David Taylor-Robinson;Jørgen Skov Jensen

  • A colour test for the measurement of antibody to certain mycoplasma species based upon the inhibition of acid production.

    D. Taylor-Robinson;R. H. Purcell;D. C. Wong;R. M. Chanock

  • Infections Due to Species of Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma: An Update

    David Taylor-Robinson

  • Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial

    Unknown

  • Safety study of nonoxynol-9 as a vaginal microbicide: evidence of adverse effects.

    M K Stafford;H Ward;A Flanagan;I J Rosenstein

  • Antibiotic susceptibilities of mycoplasmas and treatment of mycoplasmal infections.

    David Taylor-Robinson;Christiane Bébéar

  • Ureaplasma urealyticum gen. nov., sp. nov.: Proposed Nomenclature for the Human T (T-Strain) Mycoplasmas

    M. C. Shepard;C. D. Lunceford;D. K. Ford;R. H. Purcell

  • Detection and widespread distribution of Chlamydia pneumoniae in the vascular system and its possible implications.

    G Ong;B J Thomas;A O Mansfield;B R Davidson

  • Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA in joints of reactive arthritis patients by polymerase chain reaction

    D. Taylor-Robinson;C.B. Gilroy;B.J. Thomas;A.C.S. Keat

  • Erythrocyte receptors for Mycoplasma pneumoniae are sialylated oligosaccharides of Ii antigen type

    Lesley M. Loomes;Kei-ichi Uemura;Robert A. Childs;James C. Paulson

  • Role of Mycoplasma genitalium and Ureaplasma urealyticum in Acute and Chronic Nongonococcal Urethritis

    Patrick Horner;Patrick Horner;Brenda Thomas;Claire B. Gilroy;Matthias Egger

  • Mycoplasma genitalium, a new species from the human urogenital tract.

    Joseph G. Tully;David Taylor-Robinson;David L. Rose;Roger M. Cole

  • Association of Mycoplasma genitalium with acute non-gonococcal urethritis

    Unknown

  • SEROLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS AMONG HUMAN MYCOPLASMAS AS SHOWN BY COMPLEMENT-FIXATION AND GEL DIFFUSION

    David Taylor-Robinson;Norman L. Somerson;Horace C. Turner;Robert M. Chanock

  • Mycoplasma genitalium -- an up-date.

    David Taylor-Robinson

  • The genital mycoplasmas (first of two parts).

    Unknown

  • Is Mycoplasma genitalium in Women the “New Chlamydia?” A Community-Based Prospective Cohort Study

    Pippa Oakeshott;Adamma Aghaizu;Phillip Hay;Fiona Reid

  • Progesterone as a key factor in the development of a mouse model for genital-tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis

    Maureen Tuffrey;David Taylor-Robinson

  • A color test for the measurement of antibody to the non-acid-forming human Mycoplasma species.

    R. H. Purcell;D. Taylor-Robinson;D. C. Wong;R. M. Chanock

  • The association of Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma genitalium with bacterial vaginosis: observations on heterosexual women and their male partners:

    F. E. A. Keane;B. J. Thomas;C. B. Gilroy;A. Renton

  • Radical changes to chlamydial taxonomy are not necessary just yet

    J Schachter;R S Stephens;P Timms;C Kuo

  • Clinical features and management of recurrent balanitis; association with atopy and genital washing.

    H. D. L. Birley;M. M. Walker;G. A. Luzzi;R. Bell

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan P. Johnson
Alan P. Johnson Public Health England
Jørgen Skov Jensen
Jørgen Skov Jensen Statens Serum Institut
Catherine A. Ison
Catherine A. Ison Public Health England
Robert D. Goldin
Robert D. Goldin Imperial College London
Jonathan Weber
Jonathan Weber Imperial College London
Joseph G. Tully
Joseph G. Tully National Institutes of Health
Max Chernesky
Max Chernesky McMaster University
Walter E. Stamm
Walter E. Stamm University of Washington
Julius Schachter
Julius Schachter University of California, San Francisco
Adrienne M. Flanagan
Adrienne M. Flanagan University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in microbiology but seeking diverse career options, online degrees in health information and medical billing offer valuable alternatives. A bachelor of science in health information management salary is increasingly competitive, reflecting the growing demand for professionals who can manage healthcare data effectively. This field blends knowledge of healthcare with technology, appealing to those who want a less lab-focused path.

When choosing an online program, accreditation is crucial. The best online cahiim accredited health information management degree programs ensure quality education and better job prospects. CAHIIM-accredited degrees meet rigorous standards tailored to health information management careers.

For quicker entry into the healthcare administration field, students can consider fast online medical billing and coding certification programs. These certifications provide essential skills in processing healthcare claims and can be completed in a short timeframe, making them ideal for career changers or those seeking to upskill rapidly.

Additionally, many medical programs online now offer flexible learning models to fit various interests and schedules. From microbiology to broader medical fields, these programs open pathways in research, healthcare, and administration, making advanced education accessible to a wider audience.

Best Scientists Citing David Taylor-Robinson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles