World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David Taylor-Robinson

David Taylor-Robinson

D-Index & Metrics

Microbiology

D-Index
74
Citations
21356
World Ranking
1566
National Ranking
133

David Taylor-Robinson publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Taylor-Robinson sits on this spectrum.

55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 264 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 233 scientists 205–214 publications: 207 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55 publications 679+

This scientist: 513 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

David Taylor-Robinson D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Taylor-Robinson sits on this spectrum.

40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 111 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 122 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 93 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Taylor-Robinson is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several areas within health professions, medicine, and social sciences, with an emphasis on public health and social determinants of health.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Health Professions
  • Medicine
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, notable subfields of study covered by their work are:

  • General Health Professions
  • Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Their research topics show a focus on population health and social issues related to well-being. Key topics include:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations

Among the recent papers contributed to, the following stand out for their publication year and venue:

  • Trajectories of childhood adversity and mortality in early adulthood: a population-based cohort study (2020), The Lancet
  • Poverty, health, and covid-19 (2021), BMJ
  • Effects on mental health of a UK welfare reform, Universal Credit: a longitudinal controlled study (2020), The Lancet Public Health
  • Local government funding and life expectancy in England: a longitudinal ecological study (2021), The Lancet Public Health
  • How does vulnerability to COVID-19 vary between communities in England? Developing a Small Area Vulnerability Index (SAVI) (2021), Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Ben Barr
  • Daniela K Schlüter
  • Davara Bennett
  • Kate Mason
  • Alexandros Alexiou

David Taylor-Robinson has published extensively in key venues such as:

  • SSM Annual Scientific Meeting
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Journal of Public Health
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

Best Publications

  • Abnormal bacterial colonisation of the genital tract and subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage

    P E Hay;R F Lamont;D Taylor-Robinson;D J Morgan

  • Immunological events in regressing genital warts.

    Nicholas Coleman;Humphrey D.L. Birley;Adrian M. Renton;Nashat F. Hanna

  • Mycoplasma genitalium: from Chrysalis to Multicolored Butterfly

    David Taylor-Robinson;Jørgen Skov Jensen

  • A colour test for the measurement of antibody to certain mycoplasma species based upon the inhibition of acid production.

    D. Taylor-Robinson;R. H. Purcell;D. C. Wong;R. M. Chanock

  • Infections Due to Species of Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma: An Update

    David Taylor-Robinson

  • Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial

    Unknown

  • Safety study of nonoxynol-9 as a vaginal microbicide: evidence of adverse effects.

    M K Stafford;H Ward;A Flanagan;I J Rosenstein

  • Antibiotic susceptibilities of mycoplasmas and treatment of mycoplasmal infections.

    David Taylor-Robinson;Christiane Bébéar

  • Ureaplasma urealyticum gen. nov., sp. nov.: Proposed Nomenclature for the Human T (T-Strain) Mycoplasmas

    M. C. Shepard;C. D. Lunceford;D. K. Ford;R. H. Purcell

  • Detection and widespread distribution of Chlamydia pneumoniae in the vascular system and its possible implications.

    G Ong;B J Thomas;A O Mansfield;B R Davidson

  • Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA in joints of reactive arthritis patients by polymerase chain reaction

    D. Taylor-Robinson;C.B. Gilroy;B.J. Thomas;A.C.S. Keat

  • Erythrocyte receptors for Mycoplasma pneumoniae are sialylated oligosaccharides of Ii antigen type

    Lesley M. Loomes;Kei-ichi Uemura;Robert A. Childs;James C. Paulson

  • Role of Mycoplasma genitalium and Ureaplasma urealyticum in Acute and Chronic Nongonococcal Urethritis

    Patrick Horner;Patrick Horner;Brenda Thomas;Claire B. Gilroy;Matthias Egger

  • Mycoplasma genitalium, a new species from the human urogenital tract.

    Joseph G. Tully;David Taylor-Robinson;David L. Rose;Roger M. Cole

  • Association of Mycoplasma genitalium with acute non-gonococcal urethritis

    Unknown

  • SEROLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS AMONG HUMAN MYCOPLASMAS AS SHOWN BY COMPLEMENT-FIXATION AND GEL DIFFUSION

    David Taylor-Robinson;Norman L. Somerson;Horace C. Turner;Robert M. Chanock

  • Mycoplasma genitalium -- an up-date.

    David Taylor-Robinson

  • The genital mycoplasmas (first of two parts).

    Unknown

  • Is Mycoplasma genitalium in Women the “New Chlamydia?” A Community-Based Prospective Cohort Study

    Pippa Oakeshott;Adamma Aghaizu;Phillip Hay;Fiona Reid

  • Progesterone as a key factor in the development of a mouse model for genital-tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis

    Maureen Tuffrey;David Taylor-Robinson

  • A color test for the measurement of antibody to the non-acid-forming human Mycoplasma species.

    R. H. Purcell;D. Taylor-Robinson;D. C. Wong;R. M. Chanock

  • The association of Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma genitalium with bacterial vaginosis: observations on heterosexual women and their male partners:

    F. E. A. Keane;B. J. Thomas;C. B. Gilroy;A. Renton

  • Radical changes to chlamydial taxonomy are not necessary just yet

    J Schachter;R S Stephens;P Timms;C Kuo

  • Clinical features and management of recurrent balanitis; association with atopy and genital washing.

    H. D. L. Birley;M. M. Walker;G. A. Luzzi;R. Bell

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan P. Johnson
Alan P. Johnson Public Health England
Jørgen Skov Jensen
Jørgen Skov Jensen Statens Serum Institut
Catherine A. Ison
Catherine A. Ison Public Health England
Robert D. Goldin
Robert D. Goldin Imperial College London
Jonathan Weber
Jonathan Weber Imperial College London
Joseph G. Tully
Joseph G. Tully National Institutes of Health
Max Chernesky
Max Chernesky McMaster University
Walter E. Stamm
Walter E. Stamm University of Washington
Julius Schachter
Julius Schachter University of California, San Francisco
Adrienne M. Flanagan
Adrienne M. Flanagan University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in microbiology but seeking diverse career options, online degrees in health information and medical billing offer valuable alternatives. A bachelor of science in health information management salary is increasingly competitive, reflecting the growing demand for professionals who can manage healthcare data effectively. This field blends knowledge of healthcare with technology, appealing to those who want a less lab-focused path.

When choosing an online program, accreditation is crucial. The best online cahiim accredited health information management degree programs ensure quality education and better job prospects. CAHIIM-accredited degrees meet rigorous standards tailored to health information management careers.

For quicker entry into the healthcare administration field, students can consider fast online medical billing and coding certification programs. These certifications provide essential skills in processing healthcare claims and can be completed in a short timeframe, making them ideal for career changers or those seeking to upskill rapidly.

Additionally, many medical programs online now offer flexible learning models to fit various interests and schedules. From microbiology to broader medical fields, these programs open pathways in research, healthcare, and administration, making advanced education accessible to a wider audience.

Best Scientists Citing David Taylor-Robinson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles