World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
51
Citations
9284
World Ranking
3663
National Ranking
1283

David P. Larsen publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Larsen sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 79 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

David P. Larsen D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Larsen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

David P. Larsen is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a specialization in subfields such as Insect Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The scientist's work encompasses multiple topics, notably Insect and Pesticide Research, Bee Products Chemical Analysis, and Plant and Animal Studies. These subjects reflect a concentration on interactions between insects and their environments, as well as chemical properties relevant to bee products.

Recent publications include the 2024 paper titled "Microbial biopesticides are inhibited by honey bee royal jelly and in vitro larval diet", published in Environmental Sciences Europe. This work addresses the interaction of microbial biopesticides with components of the honey bee diet.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David P. Larsen include:

  • Daniel R. Schmehl
  • Castillejos Gómez
  • Lisa S. Ortego

The publication venues associated with their research are predominantly from Environmental Sciences Europe.

Best Publications

  • Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition

    John L. Stoddard;David P. Larsen;Charles P. Hawkins;Richard K. Johnson

  • Regional reference sites: a method for assessing stream potentials

    Robert M. Hughes;David P. Larsen;James M. Omernik

  • A process for developing and evaluating indices of fish assemblage integrity

    Robert M Hughes;Philip R Kaufmann;Alan T Herlihy;Thomas M Kincaid

  • Rare species in multivariate analysis for bioassessment: some considerations

    Y. Cao;D. P. Larsen;R. St-J. Thorne

  • Correspondence Between Ecoregions and Spatial Patterns in Stream Ecosystems in Oregon

    Thomas R. Whittier;Robert M. Hughes;David P. Larsen

  • Variability in stream macroinvertebrates at multiple spatial scales

    Judith Li;Alan Herlihy;William Gerth;Philip Kaufmann

  • MONITORING FOR POLICY-RELEVANT REGIONALTRENDS OVER TIME

    N. Scott Urquhart;Steven G. Paulsen;David P. Larsen

  • Ecoregions: an approach to surface water protection

    R. M. Hughes;D. P. Larsen

  • Condition of stream ecosystems in the US: an overview of the first national assessment

    Steven G. Paulsen;Alice Mayio;David V. Peck;John L. Stoddard

  • Summer internal phosphorus supplies in Shagawa Lake, Minnesota

    David P. Larsen;Donald W. Schults;Kenneth W. Malueg

  • Phosphorus Retention Capacity of Lakes

    Unknown

  • Designing a Spatially Balanced, Randomized Site Selection Process for Regional Stream Surveys: The EMAP Mid-Atlantic Pilot Study

    Alan T. Herlihy;David P. Larsen;Steven G. Paulsen;N. Scott Urquhart

  • Selecting reference sites for stream biological assessments: best professional judgment or objective criteria

    Thomas R. Whittier;John L. Stoddard;David P. Larsen;Alan T. Herlihy

  • The effects of macroinvertebrate taxonomic resolution in large landscape bioassessments: an example from the Mid-Atlantic Highlands, U.S.A.

    Ian R. Waite;Alan T. Herlihy;David P. Larsen;N. Scott Urquhart

  • Comparing strengths of geographic and nongeographic classifications of stream benthic macroinvertebrates in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands, USA

    Ian R. Waite;Alan T. Herlihy;David P. Larsen;Donald J. Klemm

  • Concordance of taxonomic composition patterns across multiple lake assemblages: effects of scale, body size, and land use

    Andrew P Allen;Andrew P Allen;Thomas R Whittier;David P Larsen;Philip R Kaufmann

  • COMPARISON OF ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES: THE PROBLEM OF SAMPLE REPRESENTATIVENESS

    Yong Cao;D. Dudley Williams;David P. Larsen

  • Concordance of taxonomic richness patterns across multiple assemblages in lakes of the northeastern United States

    Andrew P. Allen;Thomas R. Whittier;Philip R. Kaufmann;David P. Larsen

  • A regional framework for establishing recovery criteria

    Robert M. Hughes;Thomas R. Whittier;Christina M. Rohm;David P. Larsen

  • Development of diatom indicators of ecological conditions for streams of the western US

    R. Jan Stevenson;Yangdong Pan;Kalina M. Manoylov;Christian A. Parker

  • Correspondence between spatial patterns in fish assemblages in ohio streams and aquatic ecoregions

    David P. Larsen;James M. Omernik;Robert M. Hughes;Christina M. Rohm

  • A null model for the expected macroinvertebrate assemblage in streams

    John Van Sickle;Charles P. Hawkins;David P. Larsen;Alan T. Herlihy

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan T. Herlihy
Alan T. Herlihy Oregon State University
Robert M. Hughes
Robert M. Hughes Oregon State University
Philip R. Kaufmann
Philip R. Kaufmann Environmental Protection Agency
Charles P. Hawkins
Charles P. Hawkins Utah State University
John L. Stoddard
John L. Stoddard Environmental Protection Agency
Andrew P. Allen
Andrew P. Allen Macquarie University
Richard H. Norris
Richard H. Norris University of Canberra
Randall M. Peterman
Randall M. Peterman Simon Fraser University
Stanley V. Gregory
Stanley V. Gregory Oregon State University
Paul L. Angermeier
Paul L. Angermeier Virginia Tech

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens up diverse career opportunities in both research and allied health fields. Many students with a background in ecological sciences consider advancing their education through flexible online programs. For instance, if you're interested in communication sciences, explore asha online slp programs that maintain rigorous accreditation standards and allow for remote study.

If your undergraduate degree isn’t in speech-language pathology but you’re considering a switch, speech pathology bridge programs offer a streamlined path for non-SLP majors. These bridge courses prepare you for further graduate study and certification in speech-language pathology, often through accessible online formats.

Those interested in healthcare can benefit from the best online bsn programs for non nurses, which make it possible to transition into nursing without a prior nursing degree. This is especially relevant for students focused on environmental health or public health intersections.

Additionally, roles like psychiatric nurse practitioner are in high demand, and it’s helpful to understand the earning potential before committing. For more information, check out pmhnp salary to compare opportunities across the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing David P. Larsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles