World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Randall M. Peterman

Randall M. Peterman

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
10573
World Ranking
15089
National Ranking
532

Randall M. Peterman publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randall M. Peterman sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 133 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Randall M. Peterman D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randall M. Peterman sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Randall M. Peterman is affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada. Their academic profile indicates a focus on research activities conducted within the university setting.

Details on their recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, fields and subfields of study, as well as main topics of work, are not available. No recorded citations or documentation of book publications have been provided.

There is no recorded information on awards won or distinctions received by Randall M. Peterman.

This profile is based solely on the affiliation detail supplied without additional data on scholarly output or contributions to specific scientific domains or research networks.

Best Publications

  • Statistical Power Analysis can Improve Fisheries Research and Management

    Randall M. Peterman

  • Comparison of methods to account for autocorrelation in correlation analyses of fish data

    Brian J Pyper;Randall M Peterman

  • Principles for the conservation of wild living resources

    Marc Mangel;Lee M. Talbot;Gary K. Meffe;M. Tundi Agardy

  • Opposite effects of ocean temperature on survival rates of 120 stocks of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) in northern and southern areas

    Franz J Mueter;Randall M Peterman;Brian J Pyper

  • The Importance of Reporting Statistical Power: The Forest Decline and Acidic Deposition Example

    Randall M. Peterman

  • Movement Dynamics in a Fishery: Application of the Ideal Free Distribution to Spatial Allocation of Effort

    Darren M. Gillis;Randall M. Peterman;Albert V. Tyler

  • Patterns of covariation in survival rates of British Columbian and Alaskan sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) stocks

    Randall M. Peterman;Brian J. Pyper;Michael F. Lapointe;Milo D. Adkison

  • Relation Between Sport-Fishing Catchability Coefficients and Salmon Abundance

    Randall M. Peterman;Gregory J. Steer

  • Contribution of Early Life Stages to Interannual Variability in Recruitment of Northern Anchovy (Engraulis mordax)

    Randall M. Peterman;Michael J. Bradford;Nancy C. H. Lo;Richard D. Methot

  • Spatial correlation patterns in coastal environmental variables and survival rates of salmon in the north‐east Pacific Ocean

    Franz J. Mueter;Dan M. Ware;Randall M. Peterman

  • Dealing with uncertainty in ecosystem models: The paradox of use for living marine resource management

    J.S. Link;T.F. Ihde;C.J. Harvey;S.K. Gaichas

  • Possible solutions to some challenges facing fisheries scientists and managers

    Randall M. Peterman

  • Decision Analysis: A Method for Taking Uncertainties into Account in Risk-Based Decision Making

    Randall M. Peterman;Judith L. Anderson

  • Alternative models of climatic effects on sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka, productivity in Bristol Bay, Alaska, and the Fraser River, British Columbia

    Milo D. Adkison;Randall M. Peterman;Michael F. Lapointe;Darren M. Gillis

  • Statistical power analysis and the precautionary principle

    Randall M. Peterman;Michael M'Gonigle

  • Implications of interference among fishing vessels and the ideal free distribution to the interpretation of CPUE

    D M Gillis;R M Peterman

  • Magnitude and Trends in Abundance of Hatchery and Wild Pink Salmon, Chum Salmon, and Sockeye Salmon in the North Pacific Ocean

    Gregory T. Ruggerone;Randall M. Peterman;Brigitte Dorner;Katherine W. Myers

  • Form of Random Variation in Salmon Smolt-to-Adult Relations and Its Influence on Production Estimates

    Randall M. Peterman

  • Relationships between Coastal Ocean Conditions and Survival Rates of Northeast Pacific Salmon at Multiple Lags

    Franz J. Mueter;Brian J. Pyper;Randall M. Peterman

  • Across-Species Comparisons of Spatial Scales of Environmental Effects on Survival Rates of Northeast Pacific Salmon

    Brian J. Pyper;Franz J. Mueter;Randall M. Peterman

Frequent Co-Authors

Franz J. Mueter
Franz J. Mueter University of Alaska Fairbanks
Carl J. Walters
Carl J. Walters University of British Columbia
Ray Hilborn
Ray Hilborn University of Washington
Nicholas K. Dulvy
Nicholas K. Dulvy Simon Fraser University
Andrew B. Cooper
Andrew B. Cooper Seattle Children's Hospital
James E. Wilen
James E. Wilen University of California, Davis
Jay Barlow
Jay Barlow National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jeffrey A. Hutchings
Jeffrey A. Hutchings Dalhousie University
Jeremy S. Collie
Jeremy S. Collie University of Rhode Island
Charles Perrings
Charles Perrings Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Graduates with a background in Biology or Biochemistry have a diverse range of online degree options and career pathways in the health sciences field. Many students leverage their scientific knowledge by pursuing an online masters in healthcare management, equipping themselves for leadership roles in hospitals or biotech companies. This qualification opens doors to both operational and administrative positions across the healthcare industry.

For those interested in helping others with mental health, the fastest route is often through psychiatric np programs. These online nursing programs allow science graduates to quickly specialize and become licensed professionals catering to a growing demand for mental health services.

If nutrition science is your passion, a fast track nutrition degree online can accelerate your entry into fields like dietetics, wellness coaching, or clinical nutrition. These flexible online programs fit well for students aiming for quick career advancement.

For those considering the business side, a cheapest online mba healthcare management provides a practical way to gain critical business skills without the burden of heavy student debt, making it an attractive option for science graduates seeking management positions in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Randall M. Peterman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles