World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard H. Norris

Richard H. Norris

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
48
Citations
11832
World Ranking
4153
National Ranking
323

Richard H. Norris publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard H. Norris sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 105 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Richard H. Norris D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard H. Norris sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard H. Norris was affiliated with the University of Canberra in Australia during their academic career.

Details regarding their research papers, including titles, years of publication, publication venues, and citation counts, are not available.

No information on frequent co-authors is recorded for this researcher.

There are no documented frequent publication venues related to their work.

Information about book publications, including publishers and the number of books published, has not been provided.

Data concerning main fields of study, subfields, and primary topics of research have not been supplied.

There are no records of awards or honors received by Richard H. Norris.

The scientist is deceased, and all records refer to their past academic activity.

Best Publications

  • Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition

    John L. Stoddard;David P. Larsen;Charles P. Hawkins;Richard K. Johnson

  • The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates

    T. B. Reynoldson;R. H. Norris;V. H. Resh;K. E. Day

  • DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR MEASURING THE BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY OF STREAMS

    Charles P. Hawkins;Richard H. Norris;James N. Hogue;Jack W. Feminella

  • What is river health

    Richard H. Norris;Martin C. Thoms

  • Bioassessment of Freshwater Ecosystems

    Robert C. Bailey;Richard H. Norris;Trefor B. Reynoldson

  • AusRivAS: using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological condition of rivers in Western Australia

    M. J. Smith;W. R. Kay;D. H. D. Edward;P. J. Papas

  • The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction

    Colin R. Townsend;Sylvain Dolédec;Richard Norris;Kathi Peacock

  • Evaluation of the use of landscape classifications for the prediction of freshwater biota: synthesis and recommendations

    C. P. Hawkins;R. H. Norris;J. Gerritsen;R. M. Hughes

  • Biological guidelines for freshwater sediment based on BEnthic Assessment of SedimenT (the BEAST) using a multivariate approach for predicting biological state

    Trefor B. Reynoldson;R. C. Bailey;K. E. Day;R. H. Norris

  • Global insights into water resources, climate change and governance

    R Quentin Grafton;James Pittock;Richard Davis;John Williams

  • Taxonomic resolution of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in bioassessments

    Robert C. Bailey;Richard H. Norris;Trefor B. Reynoldson

  • Bioassessment of freshwater ecosystems: using the reference condition approach.

    Robert Converse Bailey;Richard H. Norris;Trefor B. Reynoldson

  • Design and implementation of rapid assessment approaches for water resource monitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates

    Vincent H. Resh;Richard H. Norris;Michael T. Barbour

  • Monitoring river health

    Richard H. Norris;Charles P. Hawkins

  • The effect of habitat‐specific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model

    Melissa Parsons;Richard Norris

  • Correlation of environmental variables with patterns of distribution and abundance of common and rare freshwater macroinvertebrates

    Daniel P. Faith;R.H. Norris

  • Predicting the natural flow regime: models for assessing hydrological alteration in streams

    Daren M. Carlisle;James Falcone;David M. Wolock;Michael R. Meador

  • Classification and Prediction of Macroinvertebrate Assemblages from Running Waters in Victoria, Australia

    Richard Marchant;Alistair Hirst;Richard Norris;Rhonda Butcher

  • Prediction and assessment of local stream habitat features using large‐scale catchment characteristics

    Nerida M. Davies;Richard H. Norris;Martin C. Thoms

  • Management options for river conservation planning: condition and conservation re‐visited

    Simon Linke;Simon Linke;Robert L. Pressey;Robert C. Bailey;Richard H. Norris

  • Assessment of river condition at a large spatial scale using predictive models

    EreN. Turak;Lloyd K. Flack;Richard H. Norris;Justen Simpson

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Linke
Simon Linke CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Martin C. Thoms
Martin C. Thoms University of New England
William A. Maher
William A. Maher University of Canberra
Charles P. Hawkins
Charles P. Hawkins Utah State University
Trefor B. Reynoldson
Trefor B. Reynoldson Acadia University
Mark Lintermans
Mark Lintermans University of Canberra
Vincent H. Resh
Vincent H. Resh University of California, Berkeley
Ian P. Prosser
Ian P. Prosser Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
John L. Stoddard
John L. Stoddard Environmental Protection Agency
Maria João Feio
Maria João Feio University of Coimbra

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA can open doors to diverse careers in science, healthcare, and education. For those interested in health-related fields, online nursing degree pathways are particularly popular. Accelerated options, such as the rn to bsn online programs, allow registered nurses to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing in as little as six months, enhancing career prospects and earning potential.

Individuals with an associate degree can also consider the asn to fnp programs, which are tailored for those aspiring to become Family Nurse Practitioners through bridge programs. If you're wondering about the steps involved, resources on how to become nurse practitioner provide guidance on the quickest routes to this advanced role.

Understanding potential compensation is also valuable for career planning. Explore details on how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make to learn about salary ranges and state-by-state compensation trends. These pathways highlight the interconnected nature of science and healthcare careers in the US and the flexibility provided by online degree options.

Best Scientists Citing Richard H. Norris

Recently Published Articles