World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
42
Citations
7574
World Ranking
5533
National Ranking
443

David M. Forsyth publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Forsyth sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 156 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

David M. Forsyth D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Forsyth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

David M. Forsyth is affiliated with the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries in Australia. Their research primarily falls within the field of Environmental Science, with a strong focus on Ecology and its related subfields including Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Genetics, and Small Animals.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies

They have been involved in publications across various venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Wildlife Research
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Biological Invasions
  • Viruses
  • Journal of Mammalogy

Their recent published papers include:

  • Methodology matters when estimating deer abundance: a global systematic review and recommendations for improvements, 2022, Journal of Wildlife Management
  • A systematic review of ground-based shooting to control overabundant mammal populations, 2020, Wildlife Research

Though not the primary author, they have close collaboration links with frequent co-authors such as Andrew J. Bengsen, Jordan O. Hampton, Anthony Pople, Sébastien Comte, and Carlo Pacioni.

David M. Forsyth has also contributed to book publications, including the "Handbook of New Zealand Mammals" (2021) published by CSIRO Publishing.

Best Publications

  • The handbook of New Zealand mammals

    Carolyn M King;David M Forsyth

  • Using presence-only and presence–absence data to estimate the current and potential distributions of established invasive species

    Andrew M. Gormley;David M. Forsyth;Peter Griffioen;Michael Lindeman

  • High predictability in introduction outcomes and the geographical range size of introduced Australian birds: a role for climate

    Richard P. Duncan;Mary Bomford;David M. Forsyth;Louise Conibear

  • Enumerating a continental-scale threat: How many feral cats are in Australia?

    S. Legge;B. P. Murphy;Hugh McGregor;John Woinarski

  • The hare, the tortoise and the crocodile: the ecology of angiosperm dominance, conifer persistence and fern filtering

    David A. Coomes;Robert B. Allen;Robert B. Allen;Warren A. Bentley;Larry E. Burrows;Larry E. Burrows

  • Factors Preventing the Recovery of New Zealand Forests Following Control of Invasive Deer

    David A. Coomes;David A. Coomes;Robert B. Allen;David M. Forsyth;William G. Lee

  • Climatic suitability, life-history traits, introduction effort, and the establishment and spread of introduced mammals in Australia

    David M. Forsyth;Richard P. Duncan;Mary Bomford;Geoff Moore

  • Propagule Size and the Relative Success of Exotic Ungulate and Bird Introductions to New Zealand

    David M. Forsyth;Richard P. Duncan

  • TESTING THE METABOLIC THEORY OF ECOLOGY: ALLOMETRIC SCALING EXPONENTS IN MAMMALS

    Richard P. Duncan;Richard P. Duncan;David M. Forsyth;Jim Hone

  • A systematic review of the impacts and management of introduced deer (family Cervidae) in Australia

    Naomi E. Davis;Ami Bennett;David M. Forsyth;David M. Forsyth;David M. J. S. Bowman

  • Diet and diet preferences of introduced ungulates (Order: Artiodactyla) in New Zealand

    D. M. Forsyth;D. A. Coomes;G. Nugent;G. M. J. Hall

  • Modeling the Relationship Between Fecal Pellet Indices and Deer Density

    David M. Forsyth;Richard J. Barker;Grant Morriss;Michael P. Scroggie

  • Estimates of maximum annual population growth rates (rm) of mammals and their application in wildlife management

    Jim Hone;Richard P. Duncan;Richard P. Duncan;David M. Forsyth

  • Species distributions, surrogacy, and important conservation regions in Canada

    Leanna D. Warman;David M. Forsyth;David M. Forsyth;A. R. E. Sinclair;Kathryn Freemark

  • TESTING THE IRRUPTIVE PARADIGM OF LARGE-HERBIVORE DYNAMICS

    David M. Forsyth;Peter Caley

  • Towards a global terrestrial species monitoring program

    Dirk S Schmeller;Dirk S Schmeller;Dirk S Schmeller;Romain Julliard;Peter J Bellingham;Monika Bohm

  • Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. I. Patterns of control and monitoring.

    Ben Reddiex;David M. Forsyth;Eve McDonald-Madden;Eve McDonald-Madden;Luke D. Einoder;Luke D. Einoder

  • A SUBSTANTIAL ENERGETIC COST TO MALE REPRODUCTION IN A SEXUALLY DIMORPHIC UNGULATE

    David M. Forsyth;David M. Forsyth;Richard P. Duncan;Ken G. Tustin;Jean-Michel Gaillard

  • Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. II. Reliability of knowledge.

    Ben Reddiex;David M. Forsyth

  • Increasing Himalayan tahr and decreasing chamois densities in the eastern Southern Alps, New Zealand: evidence for interspecific competition

    David M. Forsyth;Graham J. Hickling

  • Impacts of introduced deer and extinct moa on New Zealand ecosystems

    David M. Forsyth;Janet M. Wilmshurst;Robert B. Allen;David A. Coomes

  • Interspecific and geographic variation in the diets of sympatric carnivores: dingoes/wild dogs and red foxes in south-eastern Australia.

    Naomi E Davis;David M Forsyth;Barbara Triggs;Charlie Pascoe

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard P. Duncan
Richard P. Duncan University of Canberra
Robert B. Allen
Robert B. Allen Landcare Research
David A. Coomes
David A. Coomes University of Cambridge
Marco Festa-Bianchet
Marco Festa-Bianchet Université de Sherbrooke
Darryl I. MacKenzie
Darryl I. MacKenzie North Carolina State University
Tim S. Jessop
Tim S. Jessop Deakin University
Sarah J. Richardson
Sarah J. Richardson Landcare Research
Peter J. Bellingham
Peter J. Bellingham Landcare Research
Eve McDonald-Madden
Eve McDonald-Madden University of Queensland
Graham Nugent
Graham Nugent Landcare Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about Ecology and Evolution but interested in expanding your career options, there are many related online degrees and healthcare pathways to consider. For example, communication science graduates may transition into speech-language pathology by applying for an slp bridge program online. These programs help non-SLP majors gain the qualifications needed for advanced clinical roles.

Those with backgrounds in biology or life sciences can also explore healthcare by enrolling in accelerated bsn programs for non nurses. These flexible programs are designed for individuals without prior nursing education, helping them quickly start new careers in nursing.

Nursing professionals interested in specializing further can look into psychiatric-mental health, which is both rewarding and in demand. Researching pmhnp salary by state is valuable for those considering different regions or work settings.

Additionally, many wonder how to become a nurse practitioner in the shortest time possible. Various online pathways now exist to help career changers and science graduates efficiently enter these high-impact roles, using their background in biology or environmental sciences as a foundation.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Forsyth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles