World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4601
World Ranking
10879
National Ranking
5691

David J. Marks publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Marks sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 57 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David J. Marks D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Marks sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David J. Marks is currently affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health as well as Clinical Psychology. Additional areas of study include Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their work covers several main topics, including:

  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Sexual function and dysfunction studies

David J. Marks has contributed to recent publications that address both clinical and psychological dimensions. Two notable papers include:

  • "Association between relative age at school and persistence of ADHD in prospective studies: an individual participant data meta-analysis," published in 2023 in The Lancet Psychiatry
  • "Development of the atypical sexual interests (self-report) scale: the dimensional structure of paraphilia," published in 2023 in Psychiatry Psychology and Law

Their frequent co-authors are:

  • Corentin J. Gosling
  • Serge Caparos
  • Charlotte Pinabiaux
  • Guido Schwarzer
  • Gerta Rücker

David J. Marks's work has appeared predominantly in the venues:

  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Psychiatry Psychology and Law

Best Publications

  • Efficacy of Meta-Cognitive Therapy for Adult ADHD

    Mary V Solanto;David J Marks;Jeanette Wasserstein;Katherine J Mitchell

  • Does the Emotional Go/No-Go Task Really Measure Behavioral Inhibition? Convergence with Measures on a Non-Emotional Analog

    Kurt P. Schulz;Jin Fan;Olga Magidina;David J. Marks

  • Neuropsychological Outcome in Adolescents/Young Adults with Childhood ADHD: Profiles of Persisters, Remitters and Controls

    Jeffrey M. Halperin;Jeffrey M. Halperin;Joey W. Trampush;Carlin J. Miller;David J. Marks

  • A Randomized Clinical Trial of Cogmed Working Memory Training in School-Age Children with ADHD: A Replication in a Diverse Sample Using a Control Condition.

    A. Chacko;A.C. Bedard;D.J. Marks;N. Feirsen

  • Exposure to Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Low Socioeconomic Status Effects on Neurocognitive Development and Risk of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Offspring

    Yoko Nomura;David J. Marks;Bella Grossman;Michelle Yoon

  • Sustained attention and response inhibition in young children at risk for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Olga G. Berwid;Elizabeth A. Curko Kera;David J. Marks;Amita Santra

  • Development of a new psychosocial treatment for adult ADHD.

    Mary V. Solanto;David J. Marks;Katherine J. Mitchell;Jeanette Wasserstein

  • Cogmed Working Memory Training for Youth with ADHD: A Closer Examination of Efficacy Utilizing Evidence-Based Criteria

    Anil Chacko;Nicole Feirsen;Anne Claude Bedard;David Marks

  • Training Executive, Attention, and Motor Skills: A Proof-of-Concept Study in Preschool Children With ADHD

    Jeffrey M. Halperin;Jeffrey M. Halperin;Jeffrey M. Halperin;David J. Marks;Anne Claude V Bedard;Anil Chacko;Anil Chacko;Anil Chacko

  • Brief Report: Television Viewing and Risk for Attention Problems in Preschool Children

    Carlin J Miller;David J Marks;Scott R Miller;Olga G Berwid

  • Psychometric Properties of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire-Preschool Revision.

    Suzanne M. Clerkin;David J. Marks;Katia L. Policaro;Jeffrey M. Halperin

  • Stimulant treatment in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder moderates adolescent academic outcome.

    Robyn L. Powers;David J. Marks;Carlin J. Miller;Jeffrey H. Newcorn

  • Prenatal exposure to maternal and paternal smoking on attention deficit hyperactivity disorders symptoms and diagnosis in offspring.

    Yoko Nomura;David J. Marks;Jeffrey M. Halperin

  • Differential prefrontal cortex activation during inhibitory control in adolescents with and without childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    Kurt P. Schulz;Cheuk Y. Tang;Jin Fan;David J. Marks

  • Comorbidity in Adults with Attention‐Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    David J. Marks;Jeffrey H. Newcorn;Jeffrey M. Halperin

  • The utility of self-report measures and the continuous performance test in the diagnosis of ADHD in adults.

    Mary V. Solanto;Kenneth Etefia;David J. Marks

  • Elevated Childhood Serotonergic Function Protects Against Adolescent Aggression in Disruptive Boys

    Jeffrey M. Halperin;Jessica H. Kalmar;Kurt P. Schulz;David J. Marks

  • Association Between Variation in Neuropsychological Development and Trajectory of ADHD Severity in Early Childhood

    Khushmand Rajendran;Joey W. Trampush;David Rindskopf;David J. Marks

  • Childhood Maltreatment and Conduct Disorder: Independent Predictors of Adolescent Substance Use Disorders in Youth with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Virginia A De Sanctis;Joey W Trampush;Seth C Harty;David J Marks

  • The Impact of Impairment Criteria on Rates of ADHD Diagnoses in Preschoolers

    Dione M. Healey;Carlin J. Miller;Katia L. Castelli;David J. Marks

  • Practitioner Review: Assessment and treatment of preschool children with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    Jeffrey M. Halperin;David J. Marks

  • Adolescent outcome of ADHD: impact of childhood conduct and anxiety disorders.

    Jeffrey H Newcorn;Scott R Miller;Iliyan Ivanova;Kurt P Schulz

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey M. Halperin
Jeffrey M. Halperin Queens College, CUNY
Anil Chacko
Anil Chacko New York University
Jeffrey H. Newcorn
Jeffrey H. Newcorn Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Mary V. Solanto
Mary V. Solanto Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jin Fan
Jin Fan City University of New York
Ray Johnson
Ray Johnson Queens College, CUNY
Howard Abikoff
Howard Abikoff New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens the door to a variety of online degrees and professional pathways. Students can pursue online bachelor’s or master’s programs in psychology, counseling, or social work, which provide the skills to support diverse client populations. Many roles, such as Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), school counselor, or mental health therapist, require advanced degrees and specialized licensure.

Key issues when pursuing these careers include understanding the specific licensure requirements in your state. For example, the process of becoming a licensed therapist in Albuquerque may differ from the licensed therapist requirements in Anaheim. Requirements often involve completing an accredited degree program, fulfilling supervised clinical hours, and passing state-mandated exams.

Those interested in moving or practicing across states should be aware of regional differences in licensure, such as becoming a licensed therapist in Anchorage or learning how to become a licensed therapist in Arlington. Researching these pathways ensures you’re prepared to meet educational and professional standards, whether studying online or in person.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Marks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles