World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
23932
World Ranking
18368
National Ranking
9167

David A. Sullivan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 296 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David A. Sullivan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David A. Sullivan is affiliated with the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary in the United States. Their primary research focus lies within the field of Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Dermatology, Ophthalmology, and Physiology.

The research topics addressed by David A. Sullivan include ocular surface and contact lens studies, corneal surgery and treatments, glaucoma and retinal disorders, facial rejuvenation and surgery techniques, skin protection and aging, and olfactory and sensory function studies. These topics reflect a broad scope centered on ocular health and related medical interventions.

Frequent coauthors in their work include Jennifer P. Craig, James S. Wolffsohn, Fiona Stapleton, Lyndon Jones, and Wendy R. Kam. This collaborative network suggests active engagement with peers specializing in ophthalmology and related fields.

David A. Sullivan has contributed publications to a range of scientific venues. The main publication outlets are:

  • American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • The Ocular Surface
  • Cornea
  • Experimental Eye Research
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science

Recent papers authored or coauthored by David A. Sullivan include:

  • TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of cosmetics on the ocular surface (2023), published in The Ocular Surface

Other notable recent publications of their collaborative network relevant to related fields include studies on the effects of cosmetic preservatives and treatments on meibomian gland epithelial cells and ocular surface health; however, these were authored by other researchers.

Best Publications

  • TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report

    Anthony J. Bron;Anthony J. Bron;Cintia S. de Paiva;Sunil K. Chauhan;Stefano Bonini

  • Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among US women.

    Debra A Schaumberg;David A Sullivan;Julie E Buring;Julie E Buring;M.Reza Dana

  • The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: Executive summary

    Kelly K. Nichols;Gary N. Foulks;Anthony J. Bron;Ben J. Glasgow

  • The International Workshop on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: Report of the Subcommittee on Anatomy, Physiology, and Pathophysiology of the Meibomian Gland

    Erich Knop;Nadja Knop;Thomas Millar;Hiroto Obata

  • Impact of Dry Eye Syndrome on Vision-Related Quality of Life

    Biljana Miljanovic;Reza Dana;David A. Sullivan;Debra Ann Schaumberg;Debra Ann Schaumberg

  • TFOS DEWS II Report Executive Summary

    Jennifer P. Craig;J. Daniel Nelson;J. Daniel Nelson;Dimitri T. Azar;Carlos Belmonte

  • Prevalence of dry eye disease among US men: estimates from the Physicians' Health Studies.

    Debra Ann Schaumberg;Reza Dana;Julie Elizabeth Buring;David A. Sullivan

  • Hormone replacement therapy and dry eye syndrome.

    Debra Ann Schaumberg;Julie Elizabeth Buring;David A. Sullivan;Reza Dana

  • Identification of androgen, estrogen and progesterone receptor mRNAs in the eye.

    L. Alexandra Wickham;Jianping Gao;Ikuko Toda;Eduardo M. Rocha

  • Androgen Deficiency, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, and Evaporative Dry Eye

    David A. Sullivan;David A. Sullivan;Benjamin D. Sullivan;James E. Evans;Frank Schirra;Frank Schirra

  • TFOS DEWS II Sex, Gender, and Hormones Report

    David A. Sullivan;Eduardo M. Rocha;Pasquale Aragona;Janine A. Clayton

  • Effect of androgen deficiency on the human meibomian gland and ocular surface

    Kathleen L. Krenzer;M. Reza Dana;M. Reza Dana;M. David Ullman;Jennifer M. Cermak;Jennifer M. Cermak

  • The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: Executive Summary

    Jason J. Nichols;Mark D. P. Willcox;Anthony J. Bron;Carlos Belmonte

  • TFOS DEWS II Introduction

    J. Daniel Nelson;J. Daniel Nelson;Jennifer P. Craig;Esen K. Akpek;Dimitri T. Azar

  • Identification of androgen receptor protein and 5alpha-reductase mRNA in human ocular tissues.

    E M Rocha;L A Wickham;L A da Silveira;K L Krenzer

  • Androgen influence on the meibomian gland.

    David A. Sullivan;Benjamin D. Sullivan;M. David Ullman;Eduardo M. Rocha

  • Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes 2

    David A. Sullivan;Michael E. Stern;Kazuo Tsubota;Darlene A. Dartt

  • Epidemiology of dry eye syndrome.

    Debra A. Schaumberg;David A. Sullivan;M. Reza Dana

  • Influence of aging on the polar and neutral lipid profiles in human meibomian gland secretions

    Benjamin D. Sullivan;James E. Evans;M. Reza Dana;David A. Sullivan

  • Hormone replacement therapy and dry eye syndrome.

    D.A Schaumberg;J.E Buring;D.A Sullivan;M.R Dana

Frequent Co-Authors

Debra A. Schaumberg
Debra A. Schaumberg University of Utah
Reza Dana
Reza Dana Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Charles R. Wira
Charles R. Wira Dartmouth College
Husein A. Ajwa
Husein A. Ajwa University of California, Davis
Kurt J. Bloch
Kurt J. Bloch Harvard University
Mark D. P. Willcox
Mark D. P. Willcox University of New South Wales
Louis R. Pasquale
Louis R. Pasquale Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Carlos Belmonte
Carlos Belmonte Miguel Hernandez University
Julie E. Buring
Julie E. Buring Brigham and Women's Hospital
Murat Dogru
Murat Dogru Keio University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to many related healthcare fields, several of which can be pursued online or with flexible study options. For those interested in nursing but concerned about competitive admissions, there are easy nursing programs to get into that offer more accessible entry points without compromising on the quality of education.

Students who want to work in healthcare but prefer an administrative or support role might consider an online degree in medical billing and coding. There are several online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, making financial aid more widely available.

For learners aiming to enter nursing without the stress of pre-admission testing, some nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi are removing these exam barriers, streamlining the path to a nursing career.

Additionally, those interested in the business side of healthcare may look into a online healthcare administration degree, which can lead to leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and other medical organizations.

Best Scientists Citing David A. Sullivan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles