World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
98
Citations
42835
World Ranking
1636
National Ranking
915

daniel c liebler publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where daniel c liebler sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 418 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

daniel c liebler D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where daniel c liebler sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Enzyme
  • Gene
  • Biochemistry

His primary areas of study are Biochemistry, Proteomics, Antioxidant, Proteome and Chromatography. When carried out as part of a general Biochemistry research project, his work on Cysteine, KEAP1, Glutathione and Biotinylation is frequently linked to work in Electrophile, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study. His research integrates issues of Peptide, Tandem mass spectrometry and Bioinformatics in his study of Proteomics.

Daniel C. Liebler interconnects Photochemistry, Adduct and Liposome in the investigation of issues within Antioxidant. His studies deal with areas such as Peptide sequence, Gene, Proteogenomics and CpG site as well as Proteome. His work on Mass spectrometry, Repeatability and Digestion as part of general Chromatography research is frequently linked to Ammonium bicarbonate, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science.

His most cited work include:

  • Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments (2583 citations)
  • Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring–based measurements of proteins in plasma (859 citations)
  • Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer (831 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Daniel C. Liebler spends much of his time researching Cosmetics, Cosmetic ingredient, Proteomics, Biochemistry and Organic chemistry. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Ingredient, Food science, Alkyl, Traditional medicine and Pharmacology. His research in Proteomics intersects with topics in Proteome, Bioinformatics, Tandem mass spectrometry, Mass spectrometry and Computational biology.

His studies in Proteome integrate themes in fields like Peptide and Shotgun proteomics. His work on Cysteine, Antioxidant, Lipid peroxidation and Peptide sequence as part of general Biochemistry research is frequently linked to Electrophile, bridging the gap between disciplines. The study incorporates disciplines such as Photochemistry and Radical in addition to Antioxidant.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Cosmetics (28.18%)
  • Cosmetic ingredient (20.45%)
  • Proteomics (18.45%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2020)?

  • Cosmetics (28.18%)
  • Cosmetic ingredient (20.45%)
  • Proteomics (18.45%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Daniel C. Liebler mostly deals with Cosmetics, Cosmetic ingredient, Proteomics, Proteome and Organic chemistry. His research investigates the link between Cosmetics and topics such as Food science that cross with problems in Fatty acid. His Cosmetic ingredient research includes themes of Dermatology and Ingredient.

His Proteomics study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Proteogenomics, Cancer research, Colorectal cancer, Computational biology and Adenocarcinoma. His Computational biology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Bioinformatics, Gene expression profiling, Quantitative proteomics, Gene and Mass spectrometry. His study on Proteome is covered under Biochemistry.

Between 2015 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Reassessment of Exosome Composition (571 citations)
  • Integrated Proteogenomic Characterization of Human High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer (446 citations)
  • Proteogenomic Analysis of Human Colon Cancer Reveals New Therapeutic Opportunities. (142 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Enzyme
  • Gene
  • Organic chemistry

His primary scientific interests are in Proteome, Proteomics, Computational biology, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics. His Proteome research incorporates elements of Transcriptome, Shotgun proteomics, Flux, Lung cancer and Cell type. His research in Proteomics intersects with topics in Cancer research, Wild type, Mutant, Pentose phosphate pathway and Colorectal cancer.

His Computational biology research includes elements of Gene expression profiling, Quantitative proteomics, Mass spectrometry, Targeted mass spectrometry and Gene regulatory network. Biochemistry connects with themes related to Redox in his study. Daniel C. Liebler has included themes like Proteogenomics, Phenotype, Tumor microenvironment, Genome and DNA mismatch repair in his Bioinformatics study.

Best Publications

  • Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments

    Brendan MacLean;Daniela M. Tomazela;Nicholas Shulman;Matthew Chambers

  • Reassessment of Exosome Composition

    Dennis K. Jeppesen;Aidan M. Fenix;Jeffrey L. Franklin;James N. Higginbotham

  • Criteria for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. (RIFM) safety evaluation process for fragrance ingredients

    A. M. Api;D. Belsito;M. Bruze;P. Cadby

  • Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer

    Bing Zhang;Jing Wang;Xiaojing Wang;Jing Zhu

  • Glucose-Independent Glutamine Metabolism via TCA Cycling for Proliferation and Survival in B Cells

    Anne Le;Andrew N. Lane;Max Hamaker;Sminu Bose

  • Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring–based measurements of proteins in plasma

    Terri A. Addona;Susan E. Abbatiello;Birgit Schilling;Steven J. Skates

  • Integrated Proteogenomic Characterization of Human High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

    Hui Zhang;Tao Liu;Zhen Zhang;Samuel H. Payne

  • Repeatability and Reproducibility in Proteomic Identifications by Liquid Chromatography−Tandem Mass Spectrometry

    David L. Tabb;Lorenzo Vega-Montoto;Lorenzo Vega-Montoto;Paul A. Rudnick;Asokan Mulayath Variyath;Asokan Mulayath Variyath

  • Proteogenomic Analysis of Human Colon Cancer Reveals New Therapeutic Opportunities.

    Suhas Vasaikar;Chen Huang;Xiaojing Wang;Vladislav A. Petyuk

  • Targeted Peptide Measurements in Biology and Medicine: Best Practices for Mass Spectrometry-based Assay Development Using a Fit-for-Purpose Approach

    Steven A. Carr;Susan E. Abbatiello;Bradley L. Ackermann;Christoph Borchers

  • Proteomic Analysis of Exosomes from Mutant KRAS Colon Cancer Cells Identifies Intercellular Transfer of Mutant KRAS

    Michelle Demory Beckler;James N. Higginbotham;Jeffrey L. Franklin;Jeffrey L. Franklin;Amy-Joan Ham

  • Introduction to Proteomics: Tools for the New Biology

    Daniel C. Liebler

  • The role of metabolism in the antioxidant function of vitamin E.

    Daniel C. Liebler

  • Identification of sensor cysteines in human Keap1 modified by the cancer chemopreventive agent sulforaphane.

    Fei Hong;Michael L Freeman;Daniel C Liebler

  • Sample preparation and digestion for proteomic analyses using spin filters

    Linda L. Manza;Sheryl L. Stamer;Amy-Joan L. Ham;Simona G. Codreanu

  • Enzymatic activation of chemicals to toxic metabolites.

    F P Guengerich;D C Liebler

  • Depletion of abundant plasma proteins and limitations of plasma proteomics.

    Chengjian Tu;Paul A. Rudnick;Misti Y. Martinez;Kristin L. Cheek

  • Specific Patterns of Electrophile Adduction Trigger Keap1 Ubiquitination and Nrf2 Activation

    Fei Hong;Konjeti R. Sekhar;Michael L. Freeman;Daniel C. Liebler

  • Ischemia in Tumors Induces Early and Sustained Phosphorylation Changes in Stress Kinase Pathways but Does Not Affect Global Protein Levels

    Philipp Mertins;Feng Yang;Tao Liu;D. R. Mani

  • Elucidating mechanisms of drug-induced toxicity

    Daniel C. Liebler;F. Peter Guengerich

Frequent Co-Authors

Robbert J. C. Slebos
Robbert J. C. Slebos Vanderbilt University
David L. Tabb
David L. Tabb Stellenbosch University
Steven A. Carr
Steven A. Carr Broad Institute
Bing Zhang
Bing Zhang Baylor College of Medicine
Curtis D. Klaassen
Curtis D. Klaassen University of Kansas
Amanda G. Paulovich
Amanda G. Paulovich Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Henry Rodriguez
Henry Rodriguez National Institutes of Health
Thomas J. Slaga
Thomas J. Slaga The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Richard D. Smith
Richard D. Smith Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Robert J. Coffey
Robert J. Coffey Vanderbilt University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Biology and Biochemistry can lead to a diverse range of career opportunities in healthcare and science. Many students are turning to flexible online programs as a way to gain essential skills while maintaining their work-life balance.

For example, those interested in medical imaging can consider online rad tech programs, which prepare students for entry-level positions in radiology. If nutrition is your passion, pursuing one of the top dietetic masters programs can open doors to careers as a registered dietitian or nutritionist.

Healthcare support roles are also accessible online. Accredited medical assistant programs provide hands-on clinical skills and may offer financial aid options for eligible students. Additionally, medical assistants seeking career advancement can enroll in cma to lpn online pathways to become Licensed Practical Nurses.

These online degrees offer flexible and affordable routes to high-demand careers, allowing students to specialize, upskill, and make meaningful contributions to the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing daniel c liebler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles