World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
10862
World Ranking
4615
National Ranking
2566

Daniel B. Wright publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel B. Wright sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 182 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel B. Wright D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel B. Wright sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel B. Wright is affiliated with the University of Nevada, Las Vegas in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with particular attention to Infectious Diseases, Immunology, and Epidemiology. Wright's work also includes contributions to Animal Science and Zoology as well as Modeling and Simulation.

Their research covers several core topics, mainly centered on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, including clinical research studies related to COVID-19. They have also worked on viral infections and outbreaks, tuberculosis research and epidemiology, immunotherapy and immune responses, immune responses and vaccinations, and animal virus infections studies.

Wright has published extensively in various scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), where they have nine publications, Nature Medicine with four publications, and Nature with two. They have also contributed to npj Vaccines and Nature Communications, each with two publications.

Frequent co-authors in Wright's research include Teresa Lambe, Sarah C. Gilbert, Sandra Belij-Rammerstorfer, George M. Warimwe, and Ciarán Gilbride.

Among their most recent papers are:

  • ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques (2020) published in Nature
  • T cell and antibody responses induced by a single dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in a phase 1/2 clinical trial (2020) published in Nature Medicine
  • Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in Kenyan blood donors (2020) published in Science
  • Phase 1/2 trial of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 with a booster dose induces multifunctional antibody responses (2020) published in Nature Medicine
  • Evaluation of the immunogenicity of prime-boost vaccination with the replication-deficient viral vectored COVID-19 vaccine candidate ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (2020) published in npj Vaccines

Best Publications

  • Single-dose administration and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine: a pooled analysis of four randomised trials.

    M Voysey;S A Costa Clemens;S A Madhi;L Y Weckx

  • Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person.

    Daniel B. Wright;Gail Self;Chris Justice

  • Review of the contemporary literature on how children report sexual abuse to others: Findings, methodological issues, and implications for forensic interviewers

    Kamala London;Maggie Bruck;Daniel B. Wright;Stephen J. Ceci

  • An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition.

    Daniel B. Wright;Benjamin Sladden

  • Say it to my face: examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation

    Fiona Gabbert;Amina Memon;Kevin Allan;Daniel B. Wright

  • Understanding Statistics: An Introduction for the Social Sciences

    Daniel B. Wright

  • Development of a Measure of Postpartum PTSD: The City Birth Trauma Scale

    Susan Ayers;Daniel B. Wright;Alexandra Thornton

  • Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: people are better with their own age.

    Daniel B. Wright;Joanne N. Stroud

  • Using Bootstrap Estimation and the Plug-in Principle for Clinical Psychology Data

    Daniel B. Wright;Kamala London;Andy P. Field

  • Memory conformity: disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion.

    Fiona Gabbert;Amina Memon;Daniel B. Wright

  • When Eyewitnesses Talk

    Daniel B. Wright;Amina Memon;Elin M. Skagerberg;Fiona Gabbert

  • Comparing groups in a before--after design: When t test and ANCOVA produce different results

    Daniel B. Wright

  • Inter-racial Contact and the Own-race Bias for Face Recognition in South Africa and England

    Daniel B. Wright;Catherine E. Boyd;Catherine E. Boyd;Colin G. Tredoux

  • Comparing system and estimator variables using data from real line‐ups

    Daniel B. Wright;Anne T. McDaid

  • Making friends with your data: improving how statistics are conducted and reported.

    Daniel B. Wright

  • Telescoping of Landmark Events: Implications for Survey Research

    George D. Gaskell;Daniel B. Wright;Colm A. O'muircheartaigh

  • The prevalence of co-witnesses and co-witness discussions in real eyewitnesses

    Elin M. Skagerberg;Daniel B. Wright

  • Measurement of maternal perceptions of support and control in birth (SCIB).

    Elizabeth Ford;Susan Ayers;Daniel B. Wright

  • Measuring dissociation: comparison of alternative forms of the dissociative experiences scale.

    Daniel B. Wright;Elizabeth F. Loftus

  • I saw it for longer than you: The relationship between perceived encoding duration and memory conformity

    Fiona Gabbert;Amina Memon;Daniel B. Wright

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah C. Gilbert
Sarah C. Gilbert University of Oxford
Katie J. Ewer
Katie J. Ewer University of Oxford
Teresa Lambe
Teresa Lambe University of Oxford
Adrian V. S. Hill
Adrian V. S. Hill University of Oxford
W. E. Moerner
W. E. Moerner Stanford University
Amina Memon
Amina Memon Royal Holloway University of London
Philip Bejon
Philip Bejon University of Oxford
Ian D. Poulton
Ian D. Poulton University of Oxford
J. Anthony G. Scott
J. Anthony G. Scott University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens doors to a variety of specializations and flexible career paths. For those seeking to enhance their qualifications without committing to a full degree, an online graduate certificate psychology program provides targeted learning and helps boost your credentials in a shorter timeframe.

Many students are drawn to applied fields like industrial and organizational psychology, which focuses on workplace behavior and productivity. Those interested can consider an industrial organizational psychology degree online to pursue roles in human resources, consulting, or talent management.

If you are captivated by the intersection of psychology and the legal system, a top forensic psychology masters programs option can guide you toward careers in criminal justice, law enforcement, or legal consultancy.

Additionally, advanced studies in workplace psychology are available through organizational psychology master's programs online, preparing graduates for leadership roles in organizational development and employee training.

With so many specialized pathways, online degrees in psychology offer flexible and diverse options tailored to today’s evolving career landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel B. Wright

Trending Scientists