World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
73
Citations
17428
World Ranking
19687
National Ranking
9807

Dale G. Renlund publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dale G. Renlund sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 293 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Dale G. Renlund D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dale G. Renlund sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dale G. Renlund is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their academic profile indicates a focus on scholarly pursuits connected to this institution.

The data does not provide information on recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues associated with their work.

Details about book publications, fields of study, subfields, and main research topics have not been documented.

No awards or honors have been recorded in the available information.

The lack of detailed data on research output and collaborations limits a more comprehensive understanding of Dale G. Renlund's academic contributions.

Best Publications

  • Which White Blood Cell Subtypes Predict Increased Cardiovascular Risk

    Benjamin D. Horne;Jeffrey L. Anderson;Jeffrey L. Anderson;Jerry M. John;Jerry M. John;Aaron Weaver;Aaron Weaver

  • A randomized active-controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients. Mycophenolate Mofetil Investigators.

    Jon Kobashigawa;Leslie Miller;Dale Renlund;Robert Mentzer

  • Ischemic Heart Disease Events Triggered by Short-Term Exposure to Fine Particulate Air Pollution

    C. Arden Pope;Joseph B. Muhlestein;Heidi T. May;Dale G. Renlund

  • Carvedilol improves left ventricular function and symptoms in chronic heart failure: A double-blind randomized study

    Stephanie L. Olsen;Edward M. Gilbert;Dale G. Renlund;David O. Taylor

  • A controlled trial of ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus disease after heart transplantation.

    Thomas C. Merigan;Dale G. Renlund;Susan Keay;Michael R. Bristow

  • Risk Factors Predictive of Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

    Stavros G. Drakos;Stavros G. Drakos;Stavros G. Drakos;Lindsay Janicki;Lindsay Janicki;Benjamin D. Horne;Abdallah G. Kfoury;Abdallah G. Kfoury

  • Vascular (humoral) rejection in heart transplantation: pathologic observations and clinical implications.

    Hammond Eh;Yowell Rl;Nunoda S;Menlove Rl

  • Impact of prophylactic immediate posttransplant ganciclovir on development of transplant atherosclerosis: a post hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

    Hannah A. Valantine;Shao-Zhou Gao;Santosh G. Menon;Dale G. Renlund

  • Consensus statement: Palliative and supportive care in advanced heart failure.

    Sarah J. Goodlin;Paul J. Hauptman;Robert Arnold;Kathleen Grady

  • A randomized, multicenter comparison of tacrolimus and cyclosporine immunosuppressive regimens in cardiac transplantation: decreased hyperlipidemia and hypertension with tacrolimus.

    David O. Taylor;Mark L. Barr;Branislav Radovancevic;Dale G. Renlund

  • Differences in beta-adrenergic neuroeffector mechanisms in ischemic versus idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

    M R Bristow;F L Anderson;J D Port;L Skerl

  • Long-term β-Blocker vasodilator therapy improves cardiac function in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: A double-blind, randomized study of bucindolol versus placebo

    Edward M. Gilbert;Jeffrey L. Anderson;David Deitchman;Frank G. Yanowitz

  • Beta-blockade with bucindolol in heart failure caused by ischemic versus idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

    S L Woodley;E M Gilbert;J L Anderson;J B O'Connell

  • Three-Year Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial of Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Azathioprine in Cardiac Transplant Recipients

    Howard J. Eisen;Jon Kobashigawa;Anne Keogh;Robert Bourge

  • Left ventricular assist device as destination for patients undergoing intravenous inotropic therapy: a subset analysis from REMATCH (Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance in Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure).

    Lynne Warner Stevenson;Leslie W. Miller;Patrice Desvigne-Nickens;Deborah D. Ascheim

  • Improvements in 1-Year Cardiovascular Clinical Outcomes Associated with a Hospital-Based Discharge Medication Program

    Jason M. Lappé;Joseph B. Muhlestein;Donald L. Lappé;Rodney S. Badger

  • Relation of Heart Failure Hospitalization to Exposure to Fine Particulate Air Pollution

    C. Arden Pope;Dale G. Renlund;Dale G. Renlund;Abdallah G. Kfoury;Abdallah G. Kfoury;Heidi T. May

  • Task force 5: Complications

    Leslie W. Miller;Robert C. Schlant;Jon Kobashigawa;Spencer Kubo

  • Treatment of refractory cardiac allograft rejection with OKT3 monoclonal antibody

    Edward M. Gilbert;Charles W. Dewitt;Clement C. Eiswirth;Dale G. Renlund

  • Allograft coronary artery disease: clinical correlations with circulating anti-HLA antibodies and the immunohistopathologic pattern of vascular rejection.

    David O Taylor;Robert L Yowell;Abdullah G Kfoury;Elizabeth H Hammond

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael R. Bristow
Michael R. Bristow University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Benjamin D. Horne
Benjamin D. Horne Stanford University
Joseph B. Muhlestein
Joseph B. Muhlestein University of Utah
Jeffrey L. Anderson
Jeffrey L. Anderson University of Utah
Josef Stehlik
Josef Stehlik University of Utah
Edward G. Lakatta
Edward G. Lakatta National Institutes of Health
Gary Gerstenblith
Gary Gerstenblith Johns Hopkins University
Jon A. Kobashigawa
Jon A. Kobashigawa Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Carl T. Wittwer
Carl T. Wittwer University of Utah
Robert C. Bourge
Robert C. Bourge University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine isn’t limited to becoming a doctor. Many students also explore high-demand professions in nursing and healthcare, which often offer flexible and affordable online learning options. These programs provide a direct path into clinical work, patient care, research, and leadership in the healthcare system.

For those looking to advance quickly, online nursing programs make it possible to start or continue your healthcare education with the flexibility to maintain your current commitments. RNs aiming to expand their expertise and earning potential can consider the cheapest accredited online rn to bsn programs, which allow for career advancement in clinical or administrative roles.

If you’re seeking a leadership or specialist position, nurse practitioner tracks such as the cheapest online fnp programs are a popular, cost-effective choice. For those interested in research or education, doctorate in nursing education online programs open doors to academic, research, and high-level administrative careers.

With so many accredited and affordable online options, students can find pathways that align with their goals and financial situations—helping them move forward in medicine and allied fields.

Best Scientists Citing Dale G. Renlund

Recently Published Articles