World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Corey Archer

Corey Archer

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
33
Citations
5193
World Ranking
8240
National Ranking
171

Corey Archer publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Corey Archer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 556 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 603+

This scientist: 95 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

Corey Archer D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Corey Archer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 181 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Rise to modern levels of ocean oxygenation coincided with the Cambrian radiation of animals

    Xi Chen;Hong-Fei Ling;Derek Vance;Graham A. Shields-Zhou

  • The GEOTRACES Intermediate Data Product 2017

    Reiner Schlitzer;Robert F. Anderson;Elena Masferrer Dodas;Maeve Lohan

  • Mo isotope fractionation during adsorption to Fe (oxyhydr)oxides

    Tatiana Goldberg;Corey Archer;Derek Vance;Simon W. Poulton

  • Mass discrimination correction in multiple-collector plasma source mass spectrometry: an example using Cu and Zn isotopes

    Corey Archer;Derek Vance

  • The isotopic signature of the global riverine molybdenum flux and anoxia in the ancient oceans

    C. Archer;D. Vance

  • The determination of the isotopic composition of Cu and Zn in seawater

    J. Bermin;D. Vance;C. Archer;P.J. Statham

  • Fe isotope fractionation on FeS formation in ambient aqueous solution

    Ian B. Butler;Corey Archer;Derek Vance;Anthony Oldroyd

  • The copper isotope geochemistry of rivers and the oceans

    Derek Vance;Corey Archer;J Bermin;J Perkins

  • Proposal for an International Molybdenum Isotope Measurement Standard and Data Representation

    Thomas F. Nägler;Ariel D. Anbar;Corey Archer;Tatiana Goldberg

  • Resolution of inter-laboratory discrepancies in Mo isotope data: an intercalibration

    Tatiana Goldberg;Gwyneth Gordon;Gareth Izon;Gareth Izon;Corey Archer

  • A biomarker based on the stable isotopes of nickel.

    Vyllinniskii Cameron;Derek Vance;Corey Archer;Christopher H. House

  • Coupled Fe and S isotope evidence for Archean microbial Fe(III) and sulfate reduction

    Corey Archer;Derek Vance

  • Controls on Mo isotope fractionations in a Mn-rich anoxic marine sediment, Gullmar Fjord, Sweden

    Tatiana Goldberg;Tatiana Goldberg;Corey Archer;Derek Vance;Bo Thamdrup

  • The oceanic budgets of nickel and zinc isotopes: the importance of sulfidic environments as illustrated by the Black Sea

    Derek Vance;Susan H. Little;Susan H. Little;Corey Archer;Vyllinniskii Cameron

  • Isotopic constraints on the source of Argentinian loess – with implications for atmospheric circulation and the provenance of Antarctic dust during recent glacial maxima

    James Smith;Derek Vance;Rob A. Kemp;Corey Archer

  • Inter-calibration of a proposed new primary reference standard AA-ETH Zn for zinc isotopic analysis

    Corey Archer;Morten B. Andersen;Christophe Cloquet;Tim M. Conway

  • The behaviour of Cu and Zn isotopes during soil development: Controls on the dissolved load of rivers

    Derek Vance;Alan Matthews;Andrew Keech;Corey Archer

  • Coupled Mo-U abundances and isotopes in a small marine euxinic basin: Constraints on processes in euxinic basins

    Elvira Bura-Nakic Bura-Nakic;Morten Andersen;Morten Andersen;Corey Archer;Gregory F. de Souza

  • The Zn abundance and isotopic composition of diatom frustules, a proxy for Zn availability in ocean surface seawater

    Morten B. Andersen;Derek Vance;Corey Archer;Robert F. Anderson

  • The oceanic biogeochemistry of nickel and its isotopes: New data from the South Atlantic and the Southern Ocean biogeochemical divide

    Corey Archer;Derek Vance;Angela Milne;Maeve C. Lohan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Earth Science, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Professionals often consider expanding into fields like environmental management or science education, which can be complemented by advanced studies such as the best online master degree in human resource management. This blend of science and management skills is increasingly valuable in interdisciplinary roles.

Older adults seeking to enhance their expertise can find numerous options tailored for them. The best degrees for older adults highlight flexible, accessible programs that balance life commitments with career advancement, making Earth Science-related studies more feasible at any stage.

Additionally, for those inclined towards data curation and information science within environmental fields, exploring ALA accredited MLIS programs is a strategic move. These programs support skills in managing scientific information, which is vital for research and policy development.

Careers in Earth Science often intersect with information science roles. Understanding is library science a good career can help students assess how library and information science degrees align with their goals, especially when it comes to handling environmental data and resources.

Recently Published Articles