World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 71 19992 9955 169 18307

Clement B. Sledge publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Clement B. Sledge between 1955 and 2008, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Clement B. Sledge published across 54 years, from 1955 to 2008, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 1990. 2 of the 170 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1955 to 2008. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 1990. 1955: 1 publication 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 4 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 5 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 8 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication
1955 2008

170 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Clement B. Sledge: publications per year, 1955 to 2008
Year Publications
1955 1
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 1
1966 4
1967 0
1968 5
1969 0
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 3
1974 3
1975 3
1976 3
1977 3
1978 5
1979 5
1980 4
1981 4
1982 4
1983 7
1984 7
1985 4
1986 5
1987 9
1988 6
1989 6
1990 12
1991 5
1992 4
1993 6
1994 3
1995 4
1996 8
1997 6
1998 4
1999 5
2000 1
2001 8
2002 1
2003 3
2004 4
2005 0
2006 1
2007 1
2008 1
Total 170
Download as CSV

Clement B. Sledge publications per year - data summary

  • Clement B. Sledge, a Medicine scholar from Brigham and Women's Hospital, has 170 publications recorded across 54 years, from 1955 to 2008.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1955 and the most recent to 2008.
  • The most productive year is 1990, with 12 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1955, 1965, 1970, 2000 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 14 of the 54 years in the span carry no publications at all (1956, 1957, 1958, 1959 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.3 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2004-2008) hold 7 publications, 4% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1955-1972: 12 publications (0.7 per year); 1973-1990: 93 publications (5.2 per year); 1991-2008: 65 publications (3.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Clement B. Sledge publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clement B. Sledge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 169 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155 169
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Clement B. Sledge publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Clement B. Sledge, a Medicine scholar from Brigham and Women's Hospital, records 169 publications - the 1st percentile of the discipline.
  • 1% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Clement B. Sledge, and about 99% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Clement B. Sledge ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Clement B. Sledge D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clement B. Sledge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226 71
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Clement B. Sledge D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Clement B. Sledge, a Medicine scholar from Brigham and Women's Hospital, records 71 D-Index - the 1st percentile of the discipline.
  • 1% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Clement B. Sledge, and about 99% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Clement B. Sledge ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1992 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Clement B. Sledge is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. Their professional profile reflects involvement in the medical and scientific research community, though specific details about recent research papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues are not provided.

An award of note in their career is the membership in the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), granted in 1992. This recognition situates Clement B. Sledge among professionals who have contributed to the field of medicine at a national level.

Since there is no detailed information regarding research topics, fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work, it is evident that the publicly available profile does not specify particular areas of scientific focus or research outputs. Similarly, data on book publications or collaborative research efforts have not been documented in the available source.

This profile is based solely on the provided data and excludes unverifiable extrapolations or assumptions about research specialties or academic contributions beyond the confirmed institutional affiliation and award.

Best Publications

  • Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results.

    R C Johnston;R H Fitzgerald;W H Harris;R Poss

  • Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery.

    Paul R. Fortin;Ann E. Clarke;Lawrence Joseph;Matthew H. Liang

  • Total hip and total knee replacement (1).

    William H. Harris;Clement B. Sledge

  • Predicting the Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty

    Elizabeth A. Lingard;Jeffrey N. Katz;Elizabeth A. Wright;Clement B. Sledge

  • Hip fracture mortality. Relation to age, treatment, preoperative illness, time of surgery, and complications.

    Kenzora Je;McCarthy Re;Lowell Jd;Sledge Cb

  • Matrix collagen type and pore size influence behaviour of seeded canine chondrocytes

    Stefan Nehrer;Howard A. Breinan;Arun Ramappa;Gretchen Young

  • Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella.

    Allen Boyd;Frederick Ewald;William Thomas;Robert Poss

  • Timing of total joint replacement affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee

    Paul R. Fortin;John R. Penrod;Ann E. Clarke;Yvan St-Pierre

  • The weight-bearing shoulder. The impingement syndrome in paraplegics.

    J C Bayley;T P Cochran;C B Sledge

  • Effect of Cultured Autologous Chondrocytes on Repair of Chondral Defects in a Canine Model

    Howard A. Breinan;Tom Minas;Hu-Ping Hsu;Stefan Nehrer

  • Factors influencing the incidence and outcome of infection following total joint arthroplasty.

    Robert Poss;Thomas S. Thornhill;Frederick C. Ewald;William H. Thomas

  • Long-term results of revision total hip replacement. A follow-up report.

    P M Pellicci;P D Wilson;C B Sledge;E A Salvati

  • Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC.

    E A Lingard;J N Katz;R J Wright;E A Wright

  • Canine chondrocytes seeded in type I and type II collagen implants investigated in vitro.

    Stefan Nehrer;Howard A. Breinan;Howard A. Breinan;Arun Ramappa;Sonya Shortkroff

  • Total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty

    Allen D. Boyd;William H. Thomas;Richard D. Scott;Clement B. Sledge

  • Chondrocyte-seeded collagen matrices implanted in a chondral defect in a canine model.

    S. Nehrer;S. Nehrer;H. A. Breinan;A. Ramappa;H.-P. Hsu

  • Knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: How important is this as an outcome measure? * ** *

    Andrew L. Miner;Elizabeth A. Lingard;Elizabeth A. Wright;Clement B. Sledge

  • Patient Expectations Regarding Total Knee Arthroplasty: Differences Among the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia

    Elizabeth A. Lingard;Clement B. Sledge;Ian D. Learmonth

  • Cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty in osteoarthritis.

    Matthew H. Liang;Karen E. Cullen;Karen E. Cullen;Martin G. Larson;Martin G. Larson;Mark S. Thompson;Mark S. Thompson

  • Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic prosthesis. Results after five to nine years: a follow-up note.

    J Wright;F C Ewald;P S Walker;W H Thomas

Frequent Co-Authors

Myron Spector
Myron Spector Brigham and Women's Hospital
Jeffrey N. Katz
Jeffrey N. Katz Brigham and Women's Hospital
Michael R. Zalutsky
Michael R. Zalutsky Duke University
Matthew H. Liang
Matthew H. Liang Brigham and Women's Hospital
Joseph D. Zuckerman
Joseph D. Zuckerman New York University
Richard D. Scott
Richard D. Scott Harvard University
Nizar N. Mahomed
Nizar N. Mahomed University Health Network
Ann E. Clarke
Ann E. Clarke University of Calgary
Eduardo A. Salvati
Eduardo A. Salvati Hospital for Special Surgery
Lawrence Joseph
Lawrence Joseph McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their medical expertise or taking alternative routes in healthcare, there are several flexible online degree options worth exploring. Nurses aiming to advance rapidly in the field can find accelerated programs, like the shortest dnp programs, which enable experienced professionals to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice efficiently without sacrificing quality.

Cost is another important factor to consider. Many learners seek out the cheapest online dnp programs to minimize debt while maximizing career potential. For those starting their healthcare journey, fast track lpn programs online offer a quick entry point into nursing, helping students begin work sooner and potentially continue their education later.

Specializations are also in demand, particularly in mental health. Options such as online pmhnp programs support nursing professionals who want to focus on psychiatric and mental health care. These programs provide flexibility, allowing students to balance their studies with work or family commitments while preparing for high-demand roles.

Best Scientists Citing Clement B. Sledge

Recently Published Articles