World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 50 5791 5330 485 458 315 8127

Claus-W. Wallesch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Claus-W. Wallesch between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Claus-W. Wallesch published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 82 publications in 1993. 1 of the 331 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 82. Peak 82 publications in 1993. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 82 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1979 2025

331 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Claus-W. Wallesch: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 1
1981 1
1982 2
1983 2
1984 1
1985 4
1986 1
1987 3
1988 3
1989 6
1990 9
1991 3
1992 5
1993 82
1994 3
1995 6
1996 3
1997 12
1998 6
1999 7
2000 5
2001 9
2002 9
2003 8
2004 23
2005 19
2006 13
2007 8
2008 13
2009 3
2010 5
2011 4
2012 4
2013 9
2014 6
2015 7
2016 6
2017 4
2018 3
2019 1
2020 4
2021 4
2022 1
2023 1
2024 0
2025 1
Total 331
Download as CSV

Claus-W. Wallesch publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claus-W. Wallesch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 308–317 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 315 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128 315
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Claus-W. Wallesch D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claus-W. Wallesch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425 50
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Claus-W. Wallesch is affiliated with Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg in Germany. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience and medicine, with a focus on clinical neurology and neurorehabilitation. Wallesch's body of work reflects an interdisciplinary approach that integrates neurology, psychiatry, cognitive neuroscience, and critical care medicine.

The main fields of study addressed by Wallesch's research include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Their work further delves into several subfields, such as:

  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Epidemiology

Wallesch's research focuses primarily on clinical and rehabilitative topics related to brain injury and neurological disorders. These include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Wallesch highlight their engagement with clinical neurorehabilitation and brain injury outcomes. Notable papers include:

  • The influence of the CRS-R score on functional outcome in patients with severe brain injury receiving early rehabilitation, 2021, BMC Neurology
  • Treatment of upper limb spasticity with inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: A randomized placebo-controlled trial, 2021, Neurorehabilitation
  • Auditory Stimulation Modulates Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome Patients, 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Kurzfassung der S2e-Leitlinie "Diagnostik und Therapie von exekutiven Dysfunktionen bei neurologischen Erkrankungen" (AWMF-030/125), 2020, Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie
  • Kurzfassung der S2e-Leitlinie "Diagnostik und Therapie von Gedächtnisstörungen bei neurologischen Erkrankungen" (AWMF-030/124), 2020, Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie

Wallesch frequently publishes in venues that include:

  • Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie
  • Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie
  • BMC Neurology
  • Neurorehabilitation
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience

They have collaborated extensively with several co-authors, reflecting a network of interdisciplinary research partnerships. Frequent collaborators are:

  • Thomas Benke
  • Helmut Hildebrandt
  • Melanie Boltzmann
  • Simone Schmidt
  • Christoph Gutenbrünner

Best Publications

  • Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie

    H. C. Diener;C. Weimar;P. Berlit;G. Deuschl

  • Poststroke Depression Is There a Pathoanatomic Correlate for Depression in the Postacute Stage of Stroke

    Manfred Herrmann;Claudius Bartels;Martin Schumacher;Claus-W. Wallesch

  • Subcortical aphasia. Commentaries. Reply

    S. E. Nadeau;B. Crosson;C.-W. Wallesch;H. Johannsen-Horbach

  • Neuropsychological sequelae of diffuse traumatic brain injury.

    Maike Fork;Claudius Bartels;Anne D Ebert;Claudia Grubich

  • Neuron-specific enolase and tau protein as neurobiochemical markers of neuronal damage are related to early clinical course and long-term outcome in acute ischemic stroke

    Michael T. Wunderlich;Hartmut Lins;Martin Skalej;Claus-W. Wallesch

  • Elevated Serum S100B Levels Indicate a Higher Risk of Hemorrhagic Transformation After Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Stroke

    Christian Foerch;Michael T. Wunderlich;Florian Dvorak;Marek Humpich

  • Release of neurobiochemical markers of brain damage is related to the neurovascular status on admission and the site of arterial occlusion in acute ischemic stroke

    Michael T. Wunderlich;Claus-W. Wallesch;Michael Goertler

  • Basal ganglia participation in language pathology

    Unknown

  • Linguistic Disorders ^ .- 'Â¥ and Pathologies

    Gerhard Blanken;Jürgen Dittmann;Hannelore Grimm;Claus-W. Wallesch

  • Depression in acute and chronic aphasia: symptoms, pathoanatomical-clinical correlations and functional implications.

    M Herrmann;C Bartels;C W Wallesch

  • Outcome after mild-to-moderate blunt head injury: effects of focal lesions and diffuse axonal injury.

    Claus-W. Wallesch;Noreen Curio;Susanne Kutz;Stefan Jost

  • Protein S-100B and neuron specific enolase as early neurobiochemical markers of the severity of traumatic brain injury.

    Manfred Herrmann;Noreen Curio;Stefan Jost;Michael T. Wunderlich

  • Long-term effects of cerebellar pathology on cognitive functions.

    Claus-W Wallesch;Andreas Horn

  • Spontaneous speech in senile dementia and aphasia: implications for a neurolinguistic model of language production

    Gerhard Blanken;Jürgen Dittmann;J.-Christian Haas;Claus-W. Wallesch

  • The neuropsychology of blunt head injury in the early postacute stage: effects of focal lesions and diffuse axonal injury.

    Claus-W. Wallesch;Noreen Curio;Imke Galazky;Stefan Jost

  • Release of brain-type and heart-type fatty acid-binding proteins in serum after acute ischaemic stroke.

    Michael T Wunderlich;Thorsten Hanhoff;Michael Goertler;Friedrich Spener

  • Depressive changes in stroke patients

    Manfred Herrmann;Claus-W. Wallesch

  • Release of glial fibrillary acidic protein is related to the neurovascular status in acute ischemic stroke.

    M. T. Wunderlich;C. W. Wallesch;M. Goertler

  • The crucial role of frontostriatal circuits for depressive disorders in the postacute stage after stroke.

    Beblo T;Wallesch Cw;Herrmann M

  • Nonverbal communication as a compensative strategy for severely nonfluent aphasics?—A quantitative approach☆

    Manfred Herrmann;Thomas Reichle;Gabriele Lucius-Hoene;Claus-W. Wallesch

  • Coping with illness after brain diseases--a comparison between patients with malignant brain tumors, stroke, Parkinson's disease and traumatic brain injury.

    Manfred Herrmann;Noreen Curio;Tobias Petz;Hans Synowitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Manfred Herrmann
Manfred Herrmann University of Bremen
Hans-Otto Karnath
Hans-Otto Karnath University of Tübingen
Wolfram S. Kunz
Wolfram S. Kunz University of Bonn
Josef Zihl
Josef Zihl Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Hermann Ackermann
Hermann Ackermann University of Tübingen
Gereon R. Fink
Gereon R. Fink University of Cologne
Christian E. Elger
Christian E. Elger University Hospital Bonn
Martin Tegenthoff
Martin Tegenthoff Ruhr University Bochum
Thomas Benke
Thomas Benke Innsbruck Medical University
Werner Hacke
Werner Hacke Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore options for studying Neuroscience in the USA, it’s worth considering related academic and career opportunities available online. Many students today seek accelerated bachelors programs, which can reduce overall study time and help you enter the workforce sooner.

Prospective Neuroscience majors may also benefit from investigating top paying degrees that are science- or healthcare-related, as these often overlap with Neuroscience coursework. Further, if career earnings are a major factor in your decision-making, reviewing the most profitable degrees can help clarify your employment outlook and future growth potential.

Affordability is often a concern for students. Fortunately, there are many cheap online colleges that accept FAFSA, allowing you to minimize tuition costs while pursuing your degree. Pairing financial smarts with the right academic focus can set you on a successful Neuro-focused career path.

Best Scientists Citing Claus-W. Wallesch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles