World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
8569
World Ranking
6670
National Ranking
41

Thomas Benke publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Benke sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 185 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Thomas Benke D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Benke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Benke is affiliated with Innsbruck Medical University in Austria. Their research spans across multiple disciplines with a primary focus on Medicine and Neuroscience. The scientist has contributed extensively to Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Neurology.

Their work addresses several key topics including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Benke has published articles in various scientific journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie
  • European Journal of Neurology
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • Medicina

Notable recent publications include:

  • "Sex and gender differences in Alzheimer's disease: current challenges and implications for clinical practice," 2020, European Journal of Neurology
  • "Strategic white matter hyperintensity locations for cognitive impairment: A multicenter lesion-symptom mapping study in 3525 memory clinic patients," 2022, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Amyloid pathology and vascular risk are associated with distinct patterns of cerebral white matter hyperintensities: A multicenter study in 3132 memory clinic patients," 2024, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Effects of Cognitive Functioning and Education on Later-Life Health Numeracy," 2020, Gerontology
  • "Spatial distributions of white matter hyperintensities on brain MRI: A pooled analysis of individual participant data from 11 memory clinic cohorts," 2023, NeuroImage Clinical

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Benke include:

  • Peter Dal-Bianco
  • Reinhold Schmidt
  • Gerhard Ransmayr
  • Edith Hofer
  • Mirthe Coenen

Best Publications

  • Learning complex arithmetic--an fMRI study.

    Unknown

  • EFNS Guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS Task Force

    Stefano F. Cappa;T. Benke;S. Clarke;B. Rossi

  • Periventricular and Subcortical Hyperintensities on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: 'Rims, Caps, and Unidentified Bright Objects'

    Andrew Kertesz;Sandra E. Black;George Tokar;Thomas Benke

  • How specifically do we learn? Imaging the learning of multiplication and subtraction.

    Anja Ischebeck;Laura Zamarian;Laura Zamarian;Christian Siedentopf;Florian Koppelstätter

  • Learning by strategies and learning by drill--evidence from an fMRI study.

    Margarete Delazer;Anja Ischebeck;Frank Domahs;Laura Zamarian

  • Arithmetic Facts without Meaning

    M. Delazer;Th. Benke

  • Cognitive impairment in multiple system atrophy: A position statement by the neuropsychology task force of the MDS multiple system atrophy (MODIMSA) study group

    Iva Stankovic;Florian Krismer;Aleksandar Jesic;Angelo Antonini

  • Language Lateralization in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Comparison between fMRI and the Wada Test

    Thomas Benke;Bülent Köylü;Pamela Visani;Elfriede Karner

  • Voxel based morphometry reveals a distinct pattern of frontal atrophy in progressive supranuclear palsy

    C Brenneis;K Seppi;M Schocke;T Benke

  • EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS task force. Members of the Task Force on Cognition Rehabilitation

    S.F. Cappa;T. Benke;S. Clarke;B Rossi

  • Repetitive speech phenomena in Parkinson's disease

    Th Benke;C Hohenstein;W Poewe;B Butterworth

  • Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer's disease.

    H. Sinz;L. Zamarian;T. Benke;G.K. Wenning

  • Decision-making with explicit and stable rules in mild Alzheimer's disease.

    M. Delazer;H. Sinz;L. Zamarian;L. Zamarian;T. Benke

  • Number processing in posterior cortical atrophy--a neuropsycholgical case study.

    M. Delazer;E. Karner;L. Zamarian;E. Donnemiller

  • Basal ganglia lesions and the theory of fronto-subcortical loops: neuropsychological findings in two patients with left caudate lesions.

    Thomas Benke;Margarete Delazer;Lisa Bartha;Alexandra Auer

  • Neuropsychological, MRI and EEG findings after very mild traumatic brain injury.

    B Voller;T Benke;K Benedetto;P Schnider

  • Sex and gender differences in Alzheimer's disease: current challenges and implications for clinical practice: Position paper of the Dementia and Cognitive Disorders Panel of the European Academy of Neurology.

    M. T. Ferretti;J. Martinkova;E. Biskup;E. Biskup;T. Benke

  • Acute conduction aphasia: An analysis of 20 cases

    Unknown

  • Successful surgical treatment of insular epilepsy with nocturnal hypermotor seizures

    Judith Dobesberger;Martin Ortler;Iris Unterberger;Gerald Walser

  • Subacute dementia and imaging correlates in a case of Fahr’s disease

    T Benke;E Karner;K Seppi;M Delazer

  • Riluzole in Huntington's disease (HD) : an open label study with one year follow up

    Klaus Seppi;Joerg Mueller;Thomas Bodner;Elisabeth Brandauer

  • Peduncular hallucinosis

    Unknown

  • Medial temporal lobe activation during semantic language processing: fMRI findings in healthy left- and right-handers.

    Lisa Bartha;Christian Brenneis;Michael Schocke;Eugen Trinka

  • EFNS Guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS Task Force: EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation

    S. F. Cappa;T. Benke;S. Clarke;B. Rossi

  • Number processing and basal ganglia dysfunction: a single case study.

    Margarete Delazer;Frank Domahs;Aliette Lochy;Elfriede Karner

  • Decision making under risk and under ambiguity in Parkinson's disease.

    M. Delazer;H. Sinz;L. Zamarian;H. Stockner

Frequent Co-Authors

Margarete Delazer
Margarete Delazer Innsbruck Medical University
Reinhold Schmidt
Reinhold Schmidt Medical University of Graz
Laura Zamarian
Laura Zamarian Innsbruck Medical University
Eugen Trinka
Eugen Trinka Paracelsus Medical University
Elke R. Gizewski
Elke R. Gizewski Innsbruck Medical University
Werner Poewe
Werner Poewe Innsbruck Medical University
Stefano F. Cappa
Stefano F. Cappa Istituto Universitario Di Studi Superiori Di Pavia
Anja Ischebeck
Anja Ischebeck University of Graz
Gregor K. Wenning
Gregor K. Wenning Innsbruck Medical University
Klaus Seppi
Klaus Seppi Innsbruck Medical University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often opens doors to a variety of connected online degrees and career routes. For those looking for a fast career boost, short certificate programs that pay well offer flexible, convenient training for in-demand fields, including health and mental health services.

If you prefer a simpler academic journey without compromising career potential, consider reviewing some of the easiest online college degree options. Programs in general psychology, healthcare administration, and the behavioral sciences can provide a foundation for various neuroscience-related jobs.

Social work is another impactful pathway for neuroscience students interested in mental health. Accredited, msw programs online allow for a streamlined, cost-effective route to becoming a mental health professional or advocate.

Additionally, specializing as a behavior analyst is possible from anywhere with the help of bcba programs online. These programs are ideal for those who want to work with individuals facing developmental or behavioral challenges, blending neuroscience with practical intervention.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Benke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles