World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
7911
World Ranking
6921
National Ranking
407

Catharine H. Rankin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catharine H. Rankin sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 130 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Catharine H. Rankin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catharine H. Rankin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Catharine H. Rankin is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and neuroscience.

The main fields of study for Rankin include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Neuroscience

Within these areas, their subfields cover specific topics such as:

  • Aging
  • Molecular Biology
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
  • Genetics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Rankin's work concentrates on several significant research topics encompassing:

  • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments

Representative recent papers authored or coauthored by Rankin include:

  • Multi-model functionalization of disease-associated PTEN missense mutations identifies multiple molecular mechanisms underlying protein dysfunction, 2020, Nature Communications
  • The Canadian Rare Diseases Models and Mechanisms (RDMM) Network: Connecting Understudied Genes to Model Organisms, 2020, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • The contribution of C. elegans neurogenetics to understanding neurodegenerative diseases, 2020, Journal of Neurogenetics
  • The role of neuropeptides in learning: Insights from C. elegans, 2020, The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology
  • Habituation in high-throughput genetic model organisms as a tool to investigate the mechanisms of neurodevelopmental disorders, 2020, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Rankin include:

  • Troy A. McDiarmid
  • Joseph Liang
  • Alex J. Yu
  • Nikolas Kokan
  • Lexis D. Kepler

Rankin's publications appear regularly in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neurogenetics
  • PLoS ONE
  • PubMed
  • Genetics

Best Publications

  • Habituation revisited: an updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation.

    Catharine H. Rankin;Thomas Abrams;Robert J. Barry;Seema Bhatnagar

  • High-throughput behavioral analysis in C. elegans.

    Nicholas A Swierczek;Andrew C Giles;Catharine H Rankin;Rex A Kerr

  • An elegant mind: learning and memory in Caenorhabditis elegans.

    Evan L. Ardiel;Catharine H. Rankin

  • Integration of mechanosensory stimuli in Caenorhabditis elegans.

    Stephen R. Wicks;Catharine H. Rankin

  • Dopamine Mediates Context-Dependent Modulation of Sensory Plasticity in C. elegans

    Katie S. Kindt;Katie S. Kindt;Kathleen B. Quast;Kathleen B. Quast;Andrew C. Giles;Subhajyoti De

  • Behavioral dissociation of dishabituation, sensitization, and inhibition in Aplysia

    Emilie A. Marcus;Thomas G. Nolen;Catharine H. Rankin;Thomas J. Carew

  • The importance of touch in development.

    Evan L Ardiel;Catharine H Rankin

  • A Dynamic Network Simulation of the Nematode Tap Withdrawal Circuit: Predictions Concerning Synaptic Function Using Behavioral Criteria

    Stephen R. Wicks;Chris J. Roehrig;Catharine H. Rankin

  • Analyses of Habituation in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Jacqueline K. Rose;Catharine H. Rankin

  • Habituation is altered in neuropsychiatric disorders-A comprehensive review with recommendations for experimental design and analysis.

    Troy A. McDiarmid;Aram C. Bernardos;Catharine H. Rankin

  • Factors affecting habituation and recovery from habituation in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

    Catharine H. Rankin;Brett S. Broster

  • From gene to identified neuron to behaviour in Caenorhabditis elegans.

    Catharine H Rankin

  • GLR-1, a non-NMDA glutamate receptor homolog, is critical for long-term memory in Caenorhabditis elegans.

    Jacqueline K. Rose;Karla R. Kaun;Sylvia H. Chen;Catharine H. Rankin

  • Mutations of the caenorhabditis elegans brain-specific inorganic phosphate transporter eat-4 affect habituation of the tap-withdrawal response without affecting the response itself.

    Catharine H. Rankin;Stephen R. Wicks

  • Context conditioning in habituation in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

    Catharine H. Rankin

  • Behavioral and genetic characterization of habituation using Caenorhabditis elegans

    Andrew C. Giles;Catharine H. Rankin

  • Dishabituation and sensitization emerge as separate processes during development in Aplysia

    CH Rankin;TJ Carew

  • Habituation mechanisms and their importance for cognitive function

    Susanne Schmid;Donald A. Wilson;Donald A. Wilson;Catharine H. Rankin

  • Blocking Memory Reconsolidation Reverses Memory-Associated Changes in Glutamate Receptor Expression

    Jacqueline K Rose;Catharine H Rankin

  • Heat shock disrupts long-term memory consolidation in Caenorhabditis elegans.

    C D Beck;C H Rankin

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas J. Carew
Thomas J. Carew New York University
Mark Stopfer
Mark Stopfer National Institutes of Health
Paul Pavlidis
Paul Pavlidis University of British Columbia
William R Schafer
William R Schafer MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Donald G. Moerman
Donald G. Moerman University of British Columbia
Donald A. Wilson
Donald A. Wilson Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Steven L. Pelech
Steven L. Pelech University of British Columbia
Michel R. Leroux
Michel R. Leroux Simon Fraser University
Murray B. Isman
Murray B. Isman University of British Columbia
Oliver E. Blacque
Oliver E. Blacque University College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Catharine H. Rankin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles