World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
9823
World Ranking
5117
National Ranking
2289

Miriam B. Goodman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miriam B. Goodman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 121 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Miriam B. Goodman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miriam B. Goodman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Miriam B. Goodman is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily revolves around the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on subfields including Aging, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, and Physiology.

The scientist's work covers multiple main topics that intersect with their core fields of study. These include:

  • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Ion channel regulation and function
  • Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
  • Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques

Miriam B. Goodman has contributed to several recent publications, demonstrating engagement with diverse aspects of developmental and cellular biology as well as biophysical techniques. Selected papers include:

  • "Expansion microscopy of C. elegans," published in 2020 in eLife
  • "Reciprocal interactions between transforming growth factor beta signaling and collagens: Insights from Caenorhabditis elegans," published in 2021 in Developmental Dynamics
  • "Upconverting microgauges reveal intraluminal force dynamics in vivo," published in 2025 in Nature
  • "Engineering Bright and Mechanosensitive Alkaline-Earth Rare-Earth Upconverting Nanoparticles," published in 2022 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
  • "A high-throughput behavioral screening platform for measuring chemotaxis by C. elegans," published in 2024 in PLoS Biology

Throughout the career, Miriam B. Goodman has collaborated frequently with a number of coauthors. The most frequent collaborators include:

  • Lucero E. Rogel-Hernandez
  • Jason R. Casar
  • Claire A. McLellan
  • Jennifer A. Dionne
  • Emily Fryer

The scientist often publishes research in venues related to biophysics and physiology. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Biophysical Journal
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Journal of General Physiology
  • PubMed
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Dissecting a circuit for olfactory behaviour in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Sreekanth H. Chalasani;Nikos Chronis;Makoto Tsunozaki;Jesse M. Gray

  • The MEC-4 DEG/ENaC channel of Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons transduces mechanical signals.

    Robert O'Hagan;Martin Chalfie;Miriam B Goodman

  • Active Currents Regulate Sensitivity and Dynamic Range in C. elegans Neurons

    Miriam B Goodman;David H Hall;Leon Avery;Shawn R Lockery

  • MEC-2 regulates C. elegans DEG/ENaC channels needed for mechanosensation

    Miriam B. Goodman;Glen G. Ernstrom;Dattananda S. Chelur;Robert O'Hagan

  • The Parallel Worm Tracker: a platform for measuring average speed and drug-induced paralysis in nematodes

    Daniel Ramot;Brandon E. Johnson;Tommie L. Berry;Lucinda Carnell

  • Ultrasound Elicits Behavioral Responses through Mechanical Effects on Neurons and Ion Channels in a Simple Nervous System.

    Jan Kubanek;Poojan Shukla;Alakananda Das;Stephen A. Baccus

  • Running hot and cold: behavioral strategies, neural circuits, and the molecular machinery for thermotaxis in C. elegans and Drosophila.

    Paul A. Garrity;Miriam B. Goodman;Aravinthan D. Samuel;Piali Sengupta

  • Bidirectional temperature-sensing by a single thermosensory neuron in C. elegans

    Daniel Ramot;Bronwyn L MacInnis;Bronwyn L MacInnis;Miriam B Goodman

  • Mechanical control of the sense of touch by β-spectrin

    Michael Krieg;Alexander R. Dunn;Miriam B. Goodman

  • Artificial dirt: microfluidic substrates for nematode neurobiology and behavior.

    Shawn R Lockery;Kristy J Lawton;Joseph C Doll;Serge Faumont

  • Transducing Touch in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Miriam B. Goodman;Erich M. Schwarz

  • Feeling Force: Physical and Physiological Principles Enabling Sensory Mechanotransduction

    Samata Katta;Michael Krieg;Miriam B. Goodman

  • A kinetic description of the calcium-activated potassium channel and its application to electrical tuning of hair cells

    Y.-C. Wu;J.J. Art;M.B. Goodman;R. Fettiplace

  • Heat Avoidance Is Regulated by Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) Channels and a Neuropeptide Signaling Pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Dominique A. Glauser;Will C. Chen;Rebecca Agin;Bronwyn L. MacInnis

  • DEG/ENaC but Not TRP Channels Are the Major Mechanoelectrical Transduction Channels in a C. elegans Nociceptor

    Shana L. Geffeney;Juan G. Cueva;Dominique A. Glauser;Joseph C. Doll

  • Phospholipids that Contain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Enhance Neuronal Cell Mechanics and Touch Sensation

    Valeria Vásquez;Michael Krieg;Dean Lockhead;Miriam B. Goodman

  • An Arf-like small G protein, ARL-8, promotes the axonal transport of presynaptic cargoes by suppressing vesicle aggregation.

    Matthew P. Klassen;Ye E. Wu;Celine I. Maeder;Isei Nakae

  • Genetic defects in β-spectrin and tau sensitize C. elegans axons to movement-induced damage via torque-tension coupling

    Michael Krieg;Jan Stühmer;Juan G Cueva;Richard Fetter

  • How we feel: ion channel partnerships that detect mechanical inputs and give rise to touch and pain perception.

    Shana L. Geffeney;Miriam B. Goodman

  • How Caenorhabditis elegans Senses Mechanical Stress, Temperature, and Other Physical Stimuli

    Miriam B Goodman;Piali Sengupta

  • PTRN-1, a microtubule minus end-binding CAMSAP homolog, promotes microtubule function in Caenorhabditis elegans neurons.

    Claire E Richardson;Kerri A Spilker;Juan G Cueva;John Perrino

  • Bidirectional thermotaxis in Caenorhabditis elegans is mediated by distinct sensorimotor strategies driven by the AFD thermosensory neurons.

    Linjiao Luo;Linjiao Luo;Nathan Cook;Vivek Venkatachalam;Luis A. Martinez-Velazquez

Frequent Co-Authors

Beth L. Pruitt
Beth L. Pruitt University of California, Santa Barbara
Kang Shen
Kang Shen Stanford University
Martin Chalfie
Martin Chalfie Columbia University
Jennifer A. Dionne
Jennifer A. Dionne Stanford University
Shawn R. Lockery
Shawn R. Lockery University of Oregon
Piali Sengupta
Piali Sengupta Brandeis University
Bronwyn MacInnis
Bronwyn MacInnis Broad Institute
Cornelia I. Bargmann
Cornelia I. Bargmann Rockefeller University
Daniel Cremers
Daniel Cremers Technical University of Munich
Paul W. Sternberg
Paul W. Sternberg California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Miriam B. Goodman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles