World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
17114
World Ranking
10082
National Ranking
4410

Carl E. Frasch publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carl E. Frasch sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 162 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Carl E. Frasch D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carl E. Frasch sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carl E. Frasch is affiliated with the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research in the United States. The scientist's work encompasses research related to biological evaluation and regulatory science within this institution.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues listed in the available data. Similarly, there are no details about book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or specific research topics associated with their work documented in the provided information.

This lack of publicly available detailed publication or topic data indicates that Carl E. Frasch's contributions may be situated primarily within institutional, regulatory, or internal research roles rather than widely disseminated academic publishing or collaboration across multiple venues.

As no awards or distinctions are recorded, there is no further information on recognition or achievements in their career.

Best Publications

  • A sensitive silver stain for detecting lipopolysaccharides in polyacrylamide gels.

    Chao-Ming Tsai;Carl E. Frasch

  • Serotype antigens of Neisseria meningitidis and a proposed scheme for designation of serotypes.

    Carl E. Frasch;Wendell D. Zollinger;Jan T. Poolman

  • Pneumococcal Type 22F Polysaccharide Absorption Improves the Specificity of a Pneumococcal-Polysaccharide Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

    Nelydia F. Concepcion;Carl E. Frasch

  • Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for quantitation of human antibodies to pneumococcal polysaccharides.

    Catherine M. Wernette;Carl E. Frasch;Dace Madore;George Carlone

  • Description and nomenclature of Neisseria meningitidis capsule locus.

    Odile B. Harrison;Heike Claus;Ying Jiang;Julia S. Bennett

  • Qualitative and quantitative assessment of meningococcal antigens to evaluate the potential strain coverage of protein-based vaccines

    John Donnelly;Ducci O. Medini;Giusepp E. Boccadifuoco;Alessia Biolchi

  • Intercontinental spread of a genetically distinctive complex of clones of Neisseria meningitidis causing epidemic disease

    D A Caugant;L O Frøholm;K Bøvre;E Holten

  • Restoration of immunity in lymphopenic individuals with cancer by vaccination and adoptive T-cell transfer

    Aaron P Rapoport;Edward A Stadtmauer;Nicole Aqui;Ashraf Badros

  • Standardization and a Multilaboratory Comparison ofNeisseria meningitidisSerogroup A and C Serum Bactericidal Assays

    Susan E. Maslanka;Linda L. Gheesling;Daniel E. Libutti;Kimberley B. J. Donaldson

  • Genetic structure of Neisseria meningitidis populations in relation to serogroup, serotype, and outer membrane protein pattern.

    D A Caugant;L F Mocca;C E Frasch;L O Frøholm

  • Bactericidal antibody is the immunologic surrogate of protection against meningococcal disease.

    Carl E. Frasch;Ray Borrow;John Donnelly

  • Use of opsonophagocytosis for serological evaluation of pneumococcal vaccines.

    Sandra Romero-Steiner;Carl E. Frasch;George Carlone;Roland A. Fleck

  • Development of natural immunity to Neisseria meningitidis.

    Andrew J. Pollard;Carl Frasch

  • Effect of O Acetylation of Neisseria meningitidis Serogroup A Capsular Polysaccharide on Development of Functional Immune Responses

    David S. Berry;David S. Berry;Freyja Lynn;Che-Hung Lee;Carl E. Frasch

  • Level of Maternal IgG Anti-Group B Streptococcus Type III Antibody Correlated with Protection of Neonates against Early-Onset Disease Caused by This Pathogen

    Feng Ying C Lin;Leonard E. Weisman;Parvin H. Azimi;Joseph B. Philips

  • Level of Maternal Antibody Required to Protect Neonates against Early-Onset Disease Caused by Group B Streptococcus Type Ia: A Multicenter, Seroepidemiology Study

    Feng-Ying C. Lin;Joseph B. Philips;Parvin H. Azimi;Leonard E. Weisman

  • Preparation of bacterial polysaccharide-protein conjugates: analytical and manufacturing challenges.

    Carl E. Frasch

  • Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Brucella abortus is less toxic than that from Escherichia coli, suggesting the possible use of B. abortus or LPS from B. abortus as a carrier in vaccines.

    J Goldstein;T Hoffman;C Frasch;E F Lizzio

  • Adherence of Isolates of Neisseria meningitidis from Patients and Carriers to Human Buccal Epithelial Cells

    D. E. Craven;M. S. Peppler;C. E. Frasch;L. F. Mocca

  • Expression of Neisseria meningitidis iron-regulated outer membrane proteins, including a 70-kilodalton transferrin receptor, and their potential for use as vaccines.

    N Banerjee-Bhatnagar;C E Frasch

Frequent Co-Authors

George M. Carlone
George M. Carlone Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Helena Käyhty
Helena Käyhty Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)
Brian D. Plikaytis
Brian D. Plikaytis Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Moon H. Nahm
Moon H. Nahm University of Alabama at Birmingham
David Goldblatt
David Goldblatt University College London
Leonard W. Mayer
Leonard W. Mayer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Wendell D. Zollinger
Wendell D. Zollinger Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
John D. Clemens
John D. Clemens University of California, Los Angeles
George G. Rhoads
George G. Rhoads Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Dominique A. Caugant
Dominique A. Caugant Norwegian Institute of Public Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for expertise in the life sciences grows, students are increasingly exploring online education to expand their career options in biology and biochemistry-related fields. Several flexible online programs offer alternative or advanced pathways and can be tailored to a range of interests and professional ambitions.

For those interested in pharmaceutical careers, online pharmd programs for non pharmacists pave the way for advanced clinical roles, even for those without a bachelor's in pharmacy. Health and fitness enthusiasts can benefit from a sports science degree online which opens up roles in coaching, health promotion, and sports management.

Students aiming for careers in movement science and rehabilitation may consider an online kinesiology bachelor's degree to access opportunities in athletic training and physical therapy. Those interested in mental health can fast-track their careers with one of the fastest pmhnp program options, addressing the critical shortage of psychiatric nurse practitioners.

Exploring these online degree pathways can help students and professionals align their education with evolving industry needs while enjoying the flexibility of distance learning.

Best Scientists Citing Carl E. Frasch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles