World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bernard N. Fields

Bernard N. Fields

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 83 1027 470 203 16005

Bernard N. Fields publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bernard N. Fields between 1967 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bernard N. Fields published across 52 years, from 1967 to 2018, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 1982. 1 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 1982. 1967: 4 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 3 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 5 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 6 publications 1977: 7 publications 1978: 8 publications 1979: 11 publications 1980: 12 publications 1981: 11 publications 1982: 21 publications 1983: 18 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 10 publications 1986: 12 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication
1967 2018

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bernard N. Fields: publications per year, 1967 to 2018
Year Publications
1967 4
1968 1
1969 3
1970 0
1971 2
1972 3
1973 5
1974 2
1975 0
1976 6
1977 7
1978 8
1979 11
1980 12
1981 11
1982 21
1983 18
1984 7
1985 10
1986 12
1987 5
1988 10
1989 6
1990 5
1991 12
1992 3
1993 6
1994 7
1995 0
1996 4
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 2
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 1
Total 209
Download as CSV

Bernard N. Fields publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard N. Fields sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 195–204 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 203 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234 203
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Bernard N. Fields D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard N. Fields sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77 83
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Bernard N. Fields was affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. The scientist engaged in academic research during their career, contributing to the scientific community as documented.

The available data does not include specific details related to recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, or main fields and subfields of study. There is also no recorded information about awards, topics of research, or book publications linked to Bernard N. Fields.

Given the limited data, it is evident that Bernard N. Fields' professional record is identified primarily by their association with a leading academic institution. Further details on their research contributions or collaborations are not present in the provided sources.

Best Publications

  • Intestinal M cells: a pathway for entry of reovirus into the host

    Jacqueline L. Wolf;Donald H. Rubin;Robert Finberg;Robert S. Kauffman

  • Sigma 1 protein of mammalian reoviruses extends from the surfaces of viral particles.

    D B Furlong;M L Nibert;B N Fields

  • Molecular basis of reovirus virulence: Role of the S1 gene

    Howard L. Weiner;Dennis Drayna;Damon R. Averill;Bernard N. Fields

  • Intracellular digestion of reovirus particles requires a low pH and is an essential step in the viral infectious cycle.

    L J Sturzenbecker;M Nibert;D Furlong;B N Fields

  • Absolute Linkage of Virulence and Central Nervous System Cell Tropism of Reoviruses to Viral Hemagglutinin

    Howard L. Weiner;M. Linda Powers;Bernard N. Fields

  • Isolation and preliminary genetic and biochemical characterization of temperature-sensitive mutants of reovirus.

    Bernard N. Fields;Wolfgang K. Joklik

  • Antibody protects against lethal infection with the neurally spreading reovirus type 3 (Dearing).

    H. W. Virgin;Rhonda S Bassel-Duby;B. N. Fields;K. L. Tyler

  • Distinct pathways of viral spread in the host determined by reovirus S1 gene segment

    Kenneth L. Tyler;Dale A. McPhee;Bernard N. Fields

  • Binding and transepithelial transport of immunoglobulins by intestinal M cells: demonstration using monoclonal IgA antibodies against enteric viral proteins.

    R Weltzin;P Lucia-Jandris;P Michetti;B N Fields

  • Determinants of reovirus interaction with the intestinal M cells and absorptive cells of murine intestine.

    Jacqueline L. Wolf;Jacqueline L. Wolf;Robert S. Kauffman;Robert S. Kauffman;Robert Finberg;Robert Finberg;Rina Dambrauskas;Rina Dambrauskas

  • Pathogenesis of viral infections. Basic concepts derived from the reovirus model.

    Arlene H. Sharpe;Bernard N. Fields

  • Monoclonal antibodies to reovirus reveal structure/function relationships between capsid proteins and genetics of susceptibility to antibody action.

    H W Virgin th;M A Mann;B N Fields;K L Tyler

  • Evidence for functional domains on the reovirus type 3 hemagglutinin.

    Stuart J. Burstin;Dale R. Spriggs;Bernard N. Fields;Bernard N. Fields

  • Neutralization of reovirus: the gene responsible for the neutralization antigen.

    H L Weiner;B N Fields

  • A carboxy-terminal fragment of protein mu 1/mu 1C is present in infectious subvirion particles of mammalian reoviruses and is proposed to have a role in penetration.

    M L Nibert;B N Fields

  • Genome RNAs and polypeptides of reovirus serotypes 1, 2, and 3.

    R F Ramig;R K Cross;B N Fields

  • Identification of the gene coding for the hemagglutinin of reovirus

    Howard L. Weiner;Robert F. Ramig;Thomas A. Mustoe;Bernard N. Fields

  • Interaction of reovirus with cell surface receptors. I. Murine and human lymphocytes have a receptor for the hemagglutinin of reovirus type 3.

    H L Weiner;K A Ault;B N Fields

  • Nucleic acid sequence of an internal image-bearing monoclonal anti-idiotype and its comparison to the sequence of the external antigen

    Claudine Bruck;Man Sung Co;Moncef Slaoui;Glen N. Gaulton

  • Syngeneic monoclonal antiidiotype can induce cellular immunity to reovirus.

    Arlene H. Sharpe;Glen N. Gaulton;Kathryn K. McDADE;Bernard N. Fields

  • Genetics of reovirus: Identification of the ds RNA segments encoding the polypeptides of the μ and σ size classes

    Thomas A. Mustoe;Robert F. Ramig;Arlene H. Sharpe;Bernard N. Fields

Frequent Co-Authors

Max L. Nibert
Max L. Nibert Harvard University
Arlene H. Sharpe
Arlene H. Sharpe Harvard University
Mark I. Greene
Mark I. Greene University of Pennsylvania
Kenneth L. Tyler
Kenneth L. Tyler University of Colorado Denver
Howard L. Weiner
Howard L. Weiner Harvard University
Rafi Ahmed
Rafi Ahmed Emory University
Robert W. Finberg
Robert W. Finberg University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Robert F. Ramig
Robert F. Ramig Baylor College of Medicine
Terence S. Dermody
Terence S. Dermody University of Pittsburgh
Jerry S. Trier
Jerry S. Trier Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology opens doors to various healthcare and science-related careers. For those interested in clinical practice, becoming a functional nurse practitioner offers a hands-on approach to patient care, blending microbiological knowledge with holistic medicine techniques.

Alternatively, professionals with a knack for detail and data management might pursue roles such as a certified professional coder. This career emphasizes coding accuracy essential for health records and billing, highlighting the importance of precision and compliance in healthcare systems.

For those drawn towards administration and technology, health information is a growing field. Positions like healthcare information managers combine business acumen with healthcare data expertise. Learning about healthcare information management salary helps understand the financial benefits and responsibilities of this pathway.

To prepare for such roles, enrolling in a cahiim accredited health information management degree online can provide essential credentials and flexible learning opportunities, ensuring readiness for dynamic healthcare environments.

Best Scientists Citing Bernard N. Fields

Recently Published Articles