World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
62
Citations
39976
World Ranking
2933
National Ranking
1286

Arend Sidow publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arend Sidow sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 106 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Arend Sidow D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arend Sidow sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Arend Sidow is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work spans several subfields including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cancer Research, and Plant Science. The primary focus of Sidow's research has been in Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Genomics and Rare Diseases, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Gene expression and cancer classification, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications, as well as Evolution and Genetic Dynamics.

Sidow has published research in various peer-reviewed journals and preprint archives. Notable papers include:

  • Benchmarking challenging small variants with linked and long reads, 2022, Cell Genomics
  • Benchmarking challenging small variants with linked and long reads, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • De novo mutational signature discovery in tumor genomes using SparseSignatures, 2021, PLoS Computational Biology
  • Aquila enables reference-assisted diploid personal genome assembly and comprehensive variant detection based on linked reads, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Aquila_stLFR: diploid genome assembly based structural variant calling package for stLFR linked-reads, 2021, Bioinformatics Advances

Sidow has frequently collaborated with other researchers including Xin Zhou, Lu Zhang, David L. Dill, Yichen Henry Liu, and Griffin L. Grubbs.

Their work has been published notably in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Cell Genomics
  • PLoS Computational Biology
  • Nature Communications

Among awards, Sidow was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2005.

Best Publications

  • Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project

    Ewan Birney;John A. Stamatoyannopoulos;Anindya Dutta;Roderic Guigó

  • The ENCODE (ENCyclopedia of DNA elements) Project

    E. A. Feingold;P. J. Good;M. S. Guyer;S. Kamholz

  • An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome

    Ian Dunham;Anshul Kundaje;Shelley F. Aldred;Patrick J. Collins

  • Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution

    Richard A. Gibbs;George M. Weinstock;Michael L. Metzker;Donna M. Muzny

  • ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia

    Stephen G. Landt;Georgi K. Marinov;Anshul Kundaje;Pouya Kheradpour

  • Identifying a high fraction of the human genome to be under selective constraint using GERP

    Eugene V. Davydov;David L. Goode;Marina Sirota;Gregory M. Cooper

  • Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data

    Mark B Gerstein;Anshul Kundaje;Manoj Hariharan;Stephen G Landt

  • Distribution and intensity of constraint in mammalian genomic sequence

    Gregory M. Cooper;Eric A. Stone;George Asimenos;Eric D. Green

  • A User's Guide to the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE)

    Richard M. Myers;John Stamatoyannopoulos;Michael Snyder;Ian Dunham

  • LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA.

    Michael Brudno;Chuong B. Do;Gregory M. Cooper;Michael F. Kim

  • Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development

    Peter W. H. Holland;Jordi Garcia-Fernàndez;Nic A. Williams;Arend Sidow

  • Genome-wide analysis of transcription factor binding sites based on ChIP-Seq data.

    Anton Valouev;David S Johnson;Andreas Sundquist;Catherine Medina

  • A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning

    Anton Valouev;Jeffrey Ichikawa;Thaisan Tonthat;Jeremy Stuart

  • SHRiMP: Accurate Mapping of Short Color-space Reads

    Stephen M. Rumble;Phil Lacroute;Adrian V. Dalca;Marc Fiume

  • Extensive sequencing of seven human genomes to characterize benchmark reference materials

    Justin M. Zook;David Catoe;Jennifer McDaniel;Lindsay Vang

  • Determinants of nucleosome organization in primary human cells

    Anton Valouev;Steven M. Johnson;Scott D. Boyd;Cheryl L. Smith

  • Jarid2/Jumonji Coordinates Control of PRC2 Enzymatic Activity and Target Gene Occupancy in Pluripotent Cells

    Jamy C. Peng;Anton Valouev;Tomek Swigut;Junmei Zhang

  • Global genomic profiling reveals an extensive p53-regulated autophagy program contributing to key p53 responses

    Daniela Kenzelmann Broz;Stephano Spano Mello;Kathryn T. Bieging;Dadi Jiang

  • Physicochemical constraint violation by missense substitutions mediates impairment of protein function and disease severity.

    Eric A. Stone;Arend Sidow

  • The origin, evolution, and functional impact of short insertion–deletion variants identified in 179 human genomes

    Stephen B. Montgomery;Stephen B. Montgomery;David L. Goode;Erika Kvikstad;Erika Kvikstad;Cornelis A. Albers;Cornelis A. Albers

Frequent Co-Authors

Serafim Batzoglou
Serafim Batzoglou Stanford University
Gregory M. Cooper
Gregory M. Cooper HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology
Eric A. Stone
Eric A. Stone North Carolina State University
Michael Brudno
Michael Brudno University of Toronto
Robert B. West
Robert B. West Stanford University
Justin M. Zook
Justin M. Zook National Institute of Standards and Technology
Richard M. Myers
Richard M. Myers HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology
Michael Snyder
Michael Snyder Stanford University
Mark Gerstein
Mark Gerstein Yale University
Eric D. Green
Eric D. Green National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA opens doors to various online degree programs and career advancements in the healthcare field. If you’re seeking flexibility, many professionals look for the rn to bsn no clinicals programs, which offer opportunities for registered nurses to advance without required on-site clinical rotations.

For those aiming to reach the top of nursing practice, the shortest dnp program online options let you quickly earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree, balancing academic rigor with time efficiency. Similarly, accelerated options exist for new healthcare professionals. Programs like the fastest medical assistant program can offer an entry point into the medical field in as little as six weeks, promising rapid skill development and employment prospects.

If you are searching for more accessible routes to advanced practice, consider the easiest dnp program. These options are designed for motivated learners looking for supportive, manageable pathways to leadership roles in healthcare. Together, these programs highlight the flexibility and variety of online healthcare degrees that can complement or pivot from a background in genetics.

Best Scientists Citing Arend Sidow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles