World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
6992
World Ranking
8534
National Ranking
4566

Antonette M. Zeiss publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonette M. Zeiss sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Antonette M. Zeiss D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonette M. Zeiss sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - APA Award for Lifetime Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association.
  • 1997 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Antonette M. Zeiss is affiliated with the United States Department of Veterans Affairs in the United States. Their research contributions primarily focus on healthcare leadership and the field of psychology as it relates to healthcare services and professional roles.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Antonette M. Zeiss include:

  • Perspectives on healthcare leadership opportunities for psychologists: An interview with Antonette Zeiss, 2020, Psychological Services
  • Peter M. Lewinsohn (1930-2022), 2023, American Psychologist

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Antonette M. Zeiss include:

  • Mira Brancu
  • Paul Rohde
  • John R. Seeley

Studies involving Antonette M. Zeiss have been published in venues such as:

  • Psychological Services
  • American Psychologist

Antonette M. Zeiss has received the following awards:

  • APA Award for Lifetime Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2013
  • Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), 1997

Best Publications

  • Clinical implications of "subthreshold" depressive symptoms.

    Peter M. Lewinsohn;Ari Solomon;John R. Seeley;Antonette Zeiss

  • The Revised Scale for Caregiving Self-Efficacy Reliability and Validity Studies

    Ann M. Steffen;Christine McKibbin;Antonette M. Zeiss;Dolores Gallagher-Thompson

  • Nonspecific improvement effects in depression using interpersonal skills training, pleasant activity schedules, or cognitive training.

    Antonette M. Zeiss;Peter M. Lewinsohn;Ricardo F. Muñoz

  • Relationship of physical disease and functional impairment to depression in older people.

    Antonette M. Zeiss;Peter M. Lewinsohn;Paul Rohde;John R. Seeley

  • Internal-external control and persistence: Validation and implications of the Stanford Preschool Internal-External Scale.

    Walter Mischel;Robert Zeiss;Antonette Zeiss

  • Team performance in health care: Assessment and development.

    Gloria D. Heinemann;Antonette M. Zeiss

  • Integrating Mental Health and Primary Care Services in the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System

    Antonette M. Zeiss;Bradley E. Karlin

  • Depression, interpersonal standard setting, and judgments of self-efficacy.

    Ruth Kanfer;Antonette M. Zeiss

  • Determinants of selective memory about the self.

    Walter Mischel;Ebbe B. Ebbesen;Antonette M. Zeiss

  • Comparative effects of the reward stimulus and its cognitive representation in voluntary delay.

    Bert Moore;Walter Mischel;Antonette Zeiss

  • Probability of relapse after recovery from an episode of depression.

    Peter M. Lewinsohn;Antonette M. Zeiss;Edward M. Duncan

  • Enduring deficits after remissions of depression: A test of the scar hypothesis.

    Antonette M. Zeiss;Peter M. Lewinsohn

  • Self-Efficacy as a Mediator of Caregiver Coping: Development and Testing of an Assessment Model

    Antonette M. Zeiss;Antonette M. Zeiss;Dolores Gallagher-Thompson;Dolores Gallagher-Thompson;Steven Lovett;Steven Lovett;Jonathon Rose;Jonathon Rose

  • Personal models of osteoarthritis and their relation to self-management activities and quality of life

    Sarah E. Hampson;Russell E. Glasgow;Antonette M. Zeiss

  • National dissemination of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in the Department of Veterans Affairs health care system: therapist and patient-level outcomes.

    Bradley E. Karlin;Gregory K. Brown;Mickey Trockel;Darby Cunning

  • Measuring Self-Efficacy expectations for Social Skills: A methodological inquiry

    Karl O. Moe;Antonette M. Zeiss

  • Position statement on interdisciplinary team training in geriatrics: An essential component of quality health care for older adults

    Marcos Montagnini;Robert M. Kaiser;Phillip G. Clark;Melanie A. Dodd

  • Interdisciplinary health care teams: The basic unit of geriatric care.

    Antonette M. Zeiss;Ann M. Steffen

  • The impact of dementia and mild memory impairment (MMI) on intimacy and sexuality in spousal relationships

    Helen D. Davies;Lori A. Newkirk;Christiane B. Pitts;Christine A. Coughlin

  • Dysphoric deficits in interpersonal standards, self-efficacy, and social comparison

    Anthony H. Ahrens;Antonette M. Zeiss;Ruth Kanfer

  • Applying Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy to the Chronically Ill Elderly: Treatment Issues and Case Illustration

    Bruce Rybarczyk;Dolores Gallagher-Thompson;John Rodman;Antonette Zeiss

Frequent Co-Authors

Dolores Gallagher-Thompson
Dolores Gallagher-Thompson Stanford University School of Medicine
Peter M. Lewinsohn
Peter M. Lewinsohn Oregon Research Institute
Larry W. Thompson
Larry W. Thompson Stanford University
Russell E. Glasgow
Russell E. Glasgow University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Laurie Chassin
Laurie Chassin Arizona State University
Sarah E. Hampson
Sarah E. Hampson Oregon Research Institute
John R. Seeley
John R. Seeley University of Oregon
Ruth Kanfer
Ruth Kanfer Georgia Institute of Technology
Walter Mischel
Walter Mischel Columbia University
Albert Bandura
Albert Bandura Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the door to various rewarding online programs and career pathways. Many students are drawn to mental health counseling, a field experiencing rapid growth across the United States. Online psychology degrees are now widely accepted and can prepare you for diverse roles, especially if you’re interested in becoming a licensed mental health counselor.

Requirements for mental health counselors vary by location. For insightful details, check out the Scottsdale mental health counselor certification requirements. Similarly, those interested in practicing in Washington state should review the Seattle mental health counselor education requirements and Spokane mental health counselor education requirements. In Missouri, explore the mental health counselor requirements in St. Louis to understand local pathways.

As you research online degrees, remember that licensure often requires additional supervised experience and passing specific exams. Review your state’s standards to ensure your chosen program meets all educational and certification needs for your desired psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Antonette M. Zeiss

Trending Scientists