World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
19692
World Ranking
12287
National Ranking
877

Antje Sucker publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antje Sucker sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 350 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Antje Sucker D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antje Sucker sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antje Sucker is affiliated with the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany and has an extensive record of research publications primarily in the fields of medicine, biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, immunology, and microbiology. Their work is particularly concentrated on oncology, immunology, molecular biology, and cancer research.

The scientist's research topics focus notably on melanoma and MAPK pathways, immunotherapy and immune responses, cutaneous melanoma detection and management, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, CAR-T cell therapy research, cancer genomics and diagnostics, as well as polyomavirus and related diseases.

Frequent publication venues for Antje Sucker include:

  • European Journal of Cancer
  • Annals of Oncology
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
  • Cancers

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Sucker include:

  • Elevated baseline serum PD-1 or PD-L1 predicts poor outcome of PD-1 inhibition therapy in metastatic melanoma, 2020, Annals of Oncology
  • Targeting the innate immunoreceptor RIG-I overcomes melanoma-intrinsic resistance to T cell immunotherapy, 2020, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Predominance of Central Memory T Cells with High T-Cell Receptor Repertoire Diversity is Associated with Response to PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibition in Merkel Cell Carcinoma, 2020, Clinical Cancer Research
  • Interleukin 17 signaling supports clinical benefit of dual CTLA-4 and PD-1 checkpoint inhibition in melanoma, 2023, Nature Cancer
  • Serum CD73 is a prognostic factor in patients with metastatic melanoma and is associated with response to anti-PD-1 therapy, 2020, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Antje Sucker are:

  • Dirk Schadendorf
  • Elisabeth Livingstone
  • Lisa Zimmer
  • Eva Hadaschik
  • Selma Ugurel

Overall, Antje Sucker's academic contributions emphasize exploring mechanisms and biomarkers related to immunotherapy and melanoma, reflected in their publication record and collaborative efforts.

Best Publications

  • Genomic correlates of response to CTLA-4 blockade in metastatic melanoma

    Eliezer M. Van Allen;Eliezer M. Van Allen;Diana Miao;Diana Miao;Bastian Schilling;Sachet A. Shukla;Sachet A. Shukla

  • Genomic Classification of Cutaneous Melanoma

    Rehan Akbani;Kadir C. Akdemir;B. Arman Aksoy;Monique Albert

  • TERT Promoter Mutations in Familial and Sporadic Melanoma

    Susanne Horn;Adina Figl;P. Sivaramakrishna Rachakonda;Christine Fischer

  • Integrative molecular and clinical modeling of clinical outcomes to PD1 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma

    David Liu;David Liu;Bastian Schilling;Bastian Schilling;Derek Liu;Derek Liu;Antje Sucker

  • The Genetic Landscape of Clinical Resistance to RAF Inhibition in Metastatic Melanoma

    Eliezer M. Van Allen;Eliezer M. Van Allen;Nikhil Wagle;Nikhil Wagle;Antje Sucker;Daniel J. Treacy

  • Melanoma genome sequencing reveals frequent PREX2 mutations

    Michael F. Berger;Michael F. Berger;Eran Hodis;Timothy P. Heffernan;Timothy P. Heffernan;Yonathan Lissanu Deribe

  • Dacarbazine (DTIC) versus vaccination with autologous peptide-pulsed dendritic cells (DC) in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: a randomized phase III trial of the DC study group of the DeCOG

    D. Schadendorf;S. Ugurel;B. Schuler-Thurner;F.O. Nestle

  • Metastatic potential of melanomas defined by specific gene expression profiles with no BRAF signature.

    Keith S Hoek;Natalie C Schlegel;Patricia Brafford;Antje Sucker

  • Baseline Peripheral Blood Biomarkers Associated with Clinical Outcome of Advanced Melanoma Patients Treated with Ipilimumab.

    Alexander Martens;Kilian Wistuba-Hamprecht;Marnix H Geukes Foppen;Jianda Yuan

  • RAS Mutations Are Associated With the Development of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Tumors in Patients Treated With RAF Inhibitors

    Patrick A. Oberholzer;Damien Kee;Damien Kee;Piotr Dziunycz;Antje Sucker

  • NCRs and DNAM-1 mediate NK cell recognition and lysis of human and mouse melanoma cell lines in vitro and in vivo

    Tadepally Lakshmikanth;Shannon Burke;Talib Hassan Ali;Silvia Kimpfler

  • Myeloid Cells and Related Chronic Inflammatory Factors as Novel Predictive Markers in Melanoma Treatment with Ipilimumab.

    Christoffer Gebhardt;Alexandra Sevko;Huanhuan Jiang;Huanhuan Jiang;Ramtin Lichtenberger

  • Acquired BRAF inhibitor resistance: A multicenter meta-analysis of the spectrum and frequencies, clinical behaviour, and phenotypic associations of resistance mechanisms.

    Douglas B. Johnson;Alexander M. Menzies;Lisa Zimmer;Zeynep Eroglu

  • Lack of clinical efficacy of imatinib in metastatic melanoma

    S Ugurel;R Hildenbrand;A Zimpfer;P La Rosée

  • Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Predict Survival of Patients with Advanced Melanoma: Comparison with Regulatory T Cells and NY-ESO-1- or Melan-A–Specific T Cells

    Benjamin Weide;Alexander Martens;Henning Zelba;Christina Stutz

  • Angiopoietin-2 Levels Are Associated with Disease Progression in Metastatic Malignant Melanoma

    Iris Helfrich;Lutz Edler;Antje Sucker;Markus Thomas;Markus Thomas

  • TERT Promoter Mutation Status as an Independent Prognostic Factor in Cutaneous Melanoma

    Klaus G. Griewank;Rajmohan Murali;Joan Anton Puig-Butille;Bastian Schilling

  • Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations and New Primary Melanomas in Patients With Advanced Melanoma Undergoing Selective BRAF Inhibition

    Lisa Zimmer;Uwe Hillen;Elisabeth Livingstone;Mario E. Lacouture

  • Integrative molecular and clinical modeling of clinical outcomes to PD1 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma

    David Liu;Bastian Schilling;Derek Liu;Antje Sucker

  • Melanoma genome sequencing reveals frequent PREX2 mutations

    Eric S. Lander;Michael F. Berger;Eran Hodis;Timothy P. Heffernan

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk Schadendorf
Dirk Schadendorf University of Duisburg-Essen
Jürgen C. Becker
Jürgen C. Becker University of Duisburg-Essen
Jochen Utikal
Jochen Utikal German Cancer Research Center
Ralf Gutzmer
Ralf Gutzmer Hannover Medical School
Levi A. Garraway
Levi A. Garraway Roche (United States)
Eliezer M. Van Allen
Eliezer M. Van Allen Harvard University
Richard A. Scolyer
Richard A. Scolyer Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Kari Hemminki
Kari Hemminki Charles University
Julia Newton-Bishop
Julia Newton-Bishop University of Leeds
Christian U. Blank
Christian U. Blank Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're studying Biology or Biochemistry, there are many online degrees and career options to consider in the health sciences. For those interested in administrative and analytical roles, exploring the him degree can open opportunities in health information management, focusing on the organization and protection of medical data.

Careers in medical records and billing are also in demand. It's useful to understand the job outlook for medical billing and coding, as this role is essential to healthcare operations and offers flexible online training options.

For those passionate about health and nutrition, pursuing an online masters degree in nutrition can prepare you for roles in dietetics, public health, and wellness coaching. This pathway allows you to make a difference in people's lives through science-based nutrition guidance.

Additionally, students curious about patient care technology may find ultrasound tech online programs appealing. These programs combine biology with hands-on imaging skills, leading to careers in diagnostic medical sonography.

Best Scientists Citing Antje Sucker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles