| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 66 | 856 | 233 | 109 | 19680 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Anthony R. Cashmore between 1969 and 2010, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anthony R. Cashmore published across 42 years, from 1969 to 2010, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 1992. 4 of the 121 publications appeared in the last two years.
121 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1969 | 1 |
| 1970 | 2 |
| 1971 | 1 |
| 1972 | 1 |
| 1973 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0 |
| 1975 | 0 |
| 1976 | 2 |
| 1977 | 0 |
| 1978 | 2 |
| 1979 | 1 |
| 1980 | 3 |
| 1981 | 3 |
| 1982 | 0 |
| 1983 | 2 |
| 1984 | 2 |
| 1985 | 8 |
| 1986 | 2 |
| 1987 | 7 |
| 1988 | 6 |
| 1989 | 7 |
| 1990 | 6 |
| 1991 | 3 |
| 1992 | 12 |
| 1993 | 3 |
| 1994 | 3 |
| 1995 | 8 |
| 1996 | 2 |
| 1997 | 6 |
| 1998 | 7 |
| 1999 | 3 |
| 2000 | 1 |
| 2001 | 5 |
| 2002 | 0 |
| 2003 | 3 |
| 2004 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3 |
| 2006 | 2 |
| 2007 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4 |
| Total | 121 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony R. Cashmore sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 109 publications — 31st percentile
31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 36–40 | 2 | |
| 41–45 | 7 | |
| 46–50 | 40 | |
| 51–55 | 58 | |
| 56–60 | 60 | |
| 61–65 | 107 | |
| 66–70 | 130 | |
| 71–75 | 153 | |
| 76–80 | 191 | |
| 81–85 | 199 | |
| 86–90 | 206 | |
| 91–95 | 218 | |
| 96–100 | 226 | |
| 101–105 | 227 | |
| 106–110 | 247 | 109 |
| 111–115 | 255 | |
| 116–120 | 253 | |
| 121–125 | 233 | |
| 126–130 | 219 | |
| 131–135 | 201 | |
| 136–140 | 194 | |
| 141–145 | 176 | |
| 146–150 | 157 | |
| 151–155 | 147 | |
| 156–160 | 151 | |
| 161–165 | 159 | |
| 166–170 | 137 | |
| 171–175 | 128 | |
| 176–180 | 126 | |
| 181–185 | 98 | |
| 186–190 | 114 | |
| 191–195 | 100 | |
| 196–200 | 90 | |
| 201–205 | 71 | |
| 206–210 | 98 | |
| 211–215 | 70 | |
| 216–220 | 86 | |
| 221–225 | 61 | |
| 226–230 | 58 | |
| 231–235 | 53 | |
| 236–240 | 64 | |
| 241–245 | 39 | |
| 246–250 | 46 | |
| 251–255 | 51 | |
| 256–260 | 36 | |
| 261–265 | 44 | |
| 266–270 | 35 | |
| 271–275 | 30 | |
| 276–280 | 33 | |
| 281–285 | 35 | |
| 286–290 | 36 | |
| 291–295 | 26 | |
| 296–300 | 26 | |
| 301–305 | 31 | |
| 306–310 | 30 | |
| 311–315 | 21 | |
| 316–320 | 29 | |
| 321–325 | 14 | |
| 326–330 | 15 | |
| 331–335 | 15 | |
| 336–340 | 17 | |
| 341–345 | 15 | |
| 346–350 | 12 | |
| 351–355 | 17 | |
| 356–360 | 18 | |
| 361–365 | 12 | |
| 366–370 | 11 | |
| 371–375 | 6 | |
| 376–380 | 6 | |
| 381–385 | 11 | |
| 386–390 | 9 | |
| 391–395 | 10 | |
| 396–400 | 8 | |
| 401–405 | 4 | |
| 406–410 | 9 | |
| 411–415 | 11 | |
| 416–420 | 4 | |
| 421–425 | 7 | |
| 426–430 | 4 | |
| 431–435 | 3 | |
| 436–440 | 5 | |
| 441–445 | 8 | |
| 446–450 | 6 | |
| 451–455 | 7 | |
| 456–460 | 5 | |
| 461–465 | 6 | |
| 466 | 2 | |
| 467+ | 99 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony R. Cashmore sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 66 D-Index — 87th percentile
87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 200 | |
| 31 | 236 | |
| 32 | 253 | |
| 33 | 283 | |
| 34 | 288 | |
| 35 | 240 | |
| 36 | 246 | |
| 37 | 243 | |
| 38 | 247 | |
| 39 | 229 | |
| 40 | 232 | |
| 41 | 230 | |
| 42 | 228 | |
| 43 | 219 | |
| 44 | 193 | |
| 45 | 164 | |
| 46 | 158 | |
| 47 | 143 | |
| 48 | 131 | |
| 49 | 127 | |
| 50 | 122 | |
| 51 | 122 | |
| 52 | 110 | |
| 53 | 102 | |
| 54 | 98 | |
| 55 | 79 | |
| 56 | 85 | |
| 57 | 88 | |
| 58 | 91 | |
| 59 | 62 | |
| 60 | 61 | |
| 61 | 59 | |
| 62 | 54 | |
| 63 | 61 | |
| 64 | 59 | |
| 65 | 58 | |
| 66 | 41 | 66 |
| 67 | 49 | |
| 68 | 39 | |
| 69 | 32 | |
| 70 | 40 | |
| 71 | 47 | |
| 72 | 38 | |
| 73 | 28 | |
| 74 | 29 | |
| 75 | 28 | |
| 76 | 22 | |
| 77 | 21 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 26 | |
| 80 | 19 | |
| 81 | 16 | |
| 82 | 12 | |
| 83 | 16 | |
| 84 | 14 | |
| 85 | 11 | |
| 86 | 17 | |
| 87 | 13 | |
| 88 | 10 | |
| 89 | 12 | |
| 90 | 18 | |
| 91 | 16 | |
| 92 | 16 | |
| 93 | 17 | |
| 94 | 12 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 9 | |
| 97 | 9 | |
| 98 | 11 | |
| 99 | 12 | |
| 100 | 5 | |
| 101 | 8 | |
| 102 | 4 | |
| 103 | 11 | |
| 104 | 5 | |
| 105 | 9 | |
| 106 | 7 | |
| 107 | 4 | |
| 108 | 8 | |
| 109+ | 99 |
Margaret Ahmad;Anthony R. Cashmore
Anthony R. Cashmore;Jose A. Jarillo;Ying-Jie Wu;Dongmei Liu
G Giuliano;E Pichersky;V S Malik;M P Timko
William B. Terzaghi;Anthony R. Cashmore
Chentao Lin;Hongyun Yang;Hongwei Guo;Todd Mockler
Jose A. Jarillo;Halina Gabrys;Juan Capel;Juan Capel;Jose M. Alonso;Jose M. Alonso
Chentao Lin;D. E. Robertson;M. Ahmad;A. A. Raibekas
Anne E. Menkens;Ulrike Schindler;Anthony R. Cashmore
Hong Quan Yang;Ying Jie Wu;Ru Hang Tang;Dongmei Liu
Hong Quan Yang;Ru Hang Tang;Anthony R. Cashmore
W.R. Briggs;C.F. Beck;A.R. Cashmore;J.M. Christie
R. G. K. Donald;A. R. Cashmore
Guido Van den Broeck;Michael P. Timko;Albert P. Kausch;Anthony R. Cashmore
Anthony R Cashmore
G Coruzzi;R Broglie;A Cashmore;N H Chua
U. Schindler;A.E. Menkens;H. Beckmann;J.R. Ecker
Ulrike Schindler;Holger Beckmann;Anthony R. Cashmore
Anthony R. Cashmore
Margaret Ahmad;Chentao Lin;Anthony R. Cashmore
L. Herrera-Estrella;G. Van den Broeck;R. Maenhaut;M. Van Montagu
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.