World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
60
Citations
13131
World Ranking
2300
National Ranking
819

Anne D. Yoder publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne D. Yoder sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 196 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Anne D. Yoder D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne D. Yoder sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Anne D. Yoder is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a concentration in Molecular Biology and Genetics. The scientist's work also includes significant contributions to Social Psychology, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The main topics of Anne D. Yoder's research encompass Primate Behavior and Ecology, Amphibian and Reptile Biology, and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies. Additional topics include Genetic Diversity and Population Structure, Bat Biology and Ecology Studies, as well as Evolution and Genetic Dynamics and Evolution and Paleontology Studies.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Anne D. Yoder include:

  • The Earth BioGenome Project 2020: Starting the clock (2022), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Phylogenomic analyses provide insights into primate evolution (2023), published in Science
  • The Mutationathon highlights the importance of reaching standardization in estimates of pedigree-based germline mutation rates (2022), published in eLife
  • Molecular Clocks without Rocks: New Solutions for Old Problems (2020), published in Trends in Genetics
  • Pedigree-based and phylogenetic methods support surprising patterns of mutation rate and spectrum in the gray mouse lemur (2021), published in Heredity

The scientist frequently publishes in venues including bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Systematic Biology, Viruses, and Molecular Ecology. The number of publications in these venues reflects ongoing engagement with both preprint and peer-reviewed outlets.

Anne D. Yoder collaborates regularly with several researchers, including Marina B. Blanco, George P. Tiley, Lydia K. Greene, Ute Radespiel, and Jordi Salmona. These co-authors have worked extensively with them over multiple projects and publications.

In 2018, Anne D. Yoder was recognized as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, an award given without a specified citation.

Best Publications

  • Phylogeography's past, present, and future: 10 years after Avise, 2000

    M. J. Hickerson;B. C. Carstens;Jeannine M Cavender-Bares;K. A. Crandall

  • Estimation of Primate Speciation Dates Using Local Molecular Clocks

    Anne D. Yoder;Ziheng Yang

  • Has Vicariance or Dispersal Been the Predominant Biogeographic Force in Madagascar? Only Time Will Tell

    Anne D. Yoder;Michael D. Nowak

  • Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny.

    Anne D. Yoder;Jodi A. Irwin;Bret A. Payseur

  • Comparison of likelihood and bayesian methods for estimating divergence times using multiple gene loci and calibration points, with application to a radiation of cute-looking mouse lemur species

    Ziheng Yang;Anne D. Yoder

  • Ancient single origin for Malagasy primates

    Anne D. Yoder;Matt Cartmill;Maryellen Ruvolo;Kathleen Smith

  • Single origin of Malagasy Carnivora from an African ancestor

    Anne D. Yoder;Anne D. Yoder;Melissa M. Burns;Sarah Zehr;Thomas Delefosse

  • Divergence dates for Malagasy lemurs estimated from multiple gene loci: geological and evolutionary context

    Anne D. Yoder;Ziheng Yang

  • Failure of the ILD to Determine Data Combinability for Slow Loris Phylogeny

    Unknown

  • Integrating statistical genetic and geospatial methods brings new power to phylogeography

    Lauren M. Chan;Jason L. Brown;Anne D. Yoder

  • Estimation of the transition/transversion rate bias and species sampling

    Ziheng Yang;Anne D. Yoder

  • Remarkable species diversity in Malagasy mouse lemurs (primates, Microcebus)

    Anne D. Yoder;Rodin M. Rasoloarison;Steven M. Goodman;Jodi A. Irwin

  • Development and application of a phylogenomic toolkit: Resolving the evolutionary history of Madagascar’s lemurs

    Julie E. Horvath;David W. Weisrock;Stephanie L. Embry;Isabella Fiorentino

  • Using Phylogenomic Data to Explore the Effects of Relaxed Clocks and Calibration Strategies on Divergence Time Estimation: Primates as a Test Case.

    Mario Dos Reis;Mario Dos Reis;Gregg F Gunnell;Jose Barba-Montoya;Alex Wilkins;Alex Wilkins

  • THE PHYLOGENY OF ROSOIDEAE (ROSACEAE) BASED ON SEQUENCES OF THE INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACERS (ITS) OF NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL DNA AND THE TRNL/F REGION OF CHLOROPLAST DNA

    Torsten Eriksson;Malin S. Hibbs;Anne D. Yoder;Charles F. Delwiche

  • Relative position of the cheirogaleidae in strepsirhine phylogeny: A comparison of morphological and molecular methods and results

    Anne D. Yoder

  • Comparative RNA sequencing reveals substantial genetic variation in endangered primates

    George H. Perry;Páll Melsted;Páll Melsted;John C. Marioni;Ying Wang

  • The role of molecular genetics in sculpting the future of integrative biogeography

    Brett R. Riddle;Michael N. Dawson;Elizabeth A. Hadly;David J. Hafner

  • What is Speciation Genomics? The roles of ecology, gene flow, and genomic architecture in the formation of species

    C Ryan Campbell;J W Poelstra;Anne D Yoder

  • Delimiting Species without Nuclear Monophyly in Madagascar's Mouse Lemurs

    David W. Weisrock;Rodin M. Rasoloarison;Isabella Fiorentino;José M. Ralison

  • Shifting ranges and conservation challenges for lemurs in the face of climate change.

    Jason L. Brown;Anne D. Yoder

  • Evidence from opsin genes rejects nocturnality in ancestral primates.

    Ying Tan;Anne D. Yoder;Nayuta Yamashita;Wen-Hsiung Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter M. Kappeler
Peter M. Kappeler German Primate Center
Jason L. Brown
Jason L. Brown Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Ziheng Yang
Ziheng Yang University College London
M. Mar Albà
M. Mar Albà Pompeu Fabra University
Lounès Chikhi
Lounès Chikhi Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência
Edward E. Louis
Edward E. Louis University of Leicester
Brice P. Noonan
Brice P. Noonan University of Mississippi
Paul A. Hohenlohe
Paul A. Hohenlohe University of Idaho
Jeffrey Rogers
Jeffrey Rogers Baylor College of Medicine
Stephan C. Schuster
Stephan C. Schuster Nanyang Technological University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about Ecology and Evolution but interested in broader career pathways, there are many flexible online healthcare degrees to consider. Nursing remains a top choice due to high demand and an array of entry points for science-minded students.

Many prospective students want to know how long does it take to become a nurse practitioner. Accelerated online programs now make it possible to earn advanced credentials more quickly than ever before.

For registered nurses aiming to advance, the shortest rn to bsn program options can help you build on your foundation efficiently. These programs typically focus on evidence-based practice, research methods, and the leadership skills needed in healthcare.

Those eager to move from an associate degree to graduate nursing roles can find rn to np programs online. These bridge programs condense the timeline between entry-level and advanced practice.

Even students with a non-nursing bachelor’s can transition into leadership roles through an online direct entry msn. This option empowers individuals from diverse science backgrounds to make a real impact in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Anne D. Yoder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles