World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
7961
World Ranking
13843
National Ranking
5501

Anitesh Barua publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anitesh Barua sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 83 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Anitesh Barua D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anitesh Barua sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anitesh Barua is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research spans primarily within the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, and Decision Sciences. Within these, their work focuses significantly on subfields including Strategy and Management, Management Science and Operations Research, Management Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, and Computer Science Applications.

The scientist's research topics cover several areas such as:

  • Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Open Source Software Innovations
  • Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
  • Auction Theory and Applications
  • Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing

Anitesh Barua has contributed to multiple publications, with a frequent presence in venues such as Information Systems Research, SSRN Electronic Journal, MIS Quarterly, European Journal of Education Studies, and Management Science.

Their recent papers include:

  • Multi-Homing Revisited: Level of Adoption and Competitive Strategies, 2021, MIS Quarterly
  • Design for Social Sharing: The Case of Mobile Apps, 2022, Information Systems Research
  • Designing for Visibility: The Case of Mobile Apps, 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Making Lemonade from Lemons: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective on Third-Party Disruptions in a Multivendor Information Technology Service, 2024, Information Systems Research
  • Making Lemonade out of Lemons: Can an IT Service Firm Benefit from Third-party Disruptions in a Multi-vendor Setting?, 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal

Frequent collaborators in their work include Ashish Agarwal, Aditya Karanam, Wen Wen, Andrew B. Whinston, and Vasundhara Sharma.

Best Publications

  • Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation

    Anitesh Barua;Charles H. Kriebel;Tridas Mukhopadhyay

  • An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value

    Anitesh Barua;Prabhudev Konana;Andrew B. Whinston;Fang Yin

  • Antecedents and Consequences of Internet Use in Procurement: An Empirical Investigation of U.S. Manufacturing Firms

    Abhay Nath Mishra;Prabhudev Konana;Anitesh Barua

  • An empirical analysis of the impact of information capabilities design on business process outsourcing performance

    Deepa Mani;Anitesh Barua;Andrew Whinston

  • The Calculus of Reengineering

    Anitesh Barua;C. H. Sophie Lee;Andrew B. Whinston

  • Understanding the service component of application service provision: empirical analysis of satisfaction with ASP services

    Anjana Susarla;Anitesh Barua;Andrew B. Whinston

  • An economic analysis of strategic information technology investments

    Anitesh Barua;Charles H. Kriebel;Tridas Mukhopadhyay

  • An Economic Analysis of the Introduction of an Electronic Data Interchange System

    Anitesh Barua;Byungtae Lee

  • An integrated assessment of productivity and efficiency impacts of information technology investments: Old data, new analysis and evidence

    Byungtae Lee;Anitesh Barua

  • Research Commentary---Cooperation, Coordination, and Governance in Multisourcing: An Agenda for Analytical and Empirical Research

    Ravi Bapna;Anitesh Barua;Deepa Mani;Amit Mehra

  • The Information Technology Productivity Paradox Revisited: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation in the Manufacturing Sector

    Anitesh Barua;Byungtae Lee

  • A Transaction Cost Perspective of the Software as a Service Business Model

    Anjana Susarla;Anitesh Barua;Andrew Whinston

  • Discovery and representation of causal relationships in MIS research: a methodological framework

    Byungtae Lee;Anitesh Barua;Andrew B. Whinston

  • Incentives and Computing Systems for Team-Based Organizations

    Anitesh Barua;C.-H. Sophie Lee;Andrew B. Whinston

  • Efficient selection of suppliers over the internet

    Anitesh Barua;Anitesh Barua;Sury Ravindran;Andrew B. Whinston

  • Multitask Agency, Modular Architecture, and Task Disaggregation in SaaS

    Anjana Susarla;Anitesh Barua;Andrew Whinston

  • Value and productivity in the Internet economy

    A. Barua;A.B. Whinston;Fang Yin

  • Virtual field experiments for a digital economy: a new research methodology for exploring an information economy

    Beomsoo Kim;Anitesh Barua;Andrew B. Whinston

  • Successfully Governing Business Process Outsourcing Relationships

    Deepa Mani;Anitesh Barua;Andrew B. Whinston

  • An electronic infrastructure for a virtual university

    Ramnath Chellappa;Anitesh Barua;Andrew B. Whinston

  • Measuring the Internet Economy

    Anitesh Barua;Jon Pinnell;Jay Shutter;Andrew B. Whinston

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew B. Whinston
Andrew B. Whinston The University of Texas at Austin
Tridas Mukhopadhyay
Tridas Mukhopadhyay Carnegie Mellon University
Ravi Bapna
Ravi Bapna University of Minnesota
William W. Cooper
William W. Cooper The University of Texas at Austin
Patrick L. Brockett
Patrick L. Brockett The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Computer Science, there are a variety of flexible online study options available in the USA. Computer science degree online programs allow learners to study at their own pace and often provide accelerated pathways for quicker graduation. These programs cater to both new students and working professionals looking to advance their careers.

If you're concerned about academic prerequisites, explore online colleges that accept low gpa. These institutions offer opportunities for students who may not meet the GPA requirements of traditional universities, making higher education more accessible.

A Computer Science background opens the door to diverse careers, and interdisciplinary fields are increasingly popular. For instance, if you’re curious about sustainability and technology, you might want to know what can i do with an environmental science degree. Many graduates find roles in data analysis, environmental monitoring, and policy advising.

Additionally, combining computer science skills with engineering can be lucrative. Consider exploring an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering for a career that blends technology and environmental problem-solving. These affordable programs offer pathways into industries seeking innovative solutions to global challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Anitesh Barua

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles