World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
46
Citations
9604
World Ranking
4604
National Ranking
105

Kai Xue publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kai Xue sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Kai Xue D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kai Xue sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kai Xue is affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Sciences in China and has contributed extensively to environmental and agricultural biological sciences. Their research primarily focuses on the dynamics of soil carbon and nitrogen, the ecology and physiology of microbial communities, and vegetation and ecosystem dynamics amid changing climatic conditions.

Their recent publications include significant works such as:

  • Grassland changes and adaptive management on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (2022), published in Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Reduced microbial stability in the active layer is associated with carbon loss under alpine permafrost degradation (2021), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Differentiation strategies of soil rare and abundant microbial taxa in response to changing climatic regimes (2020), published in Environmental Microbiology
  • Tree diversity and soil chemical properties drive the linkages between soil microbial community and ecosystem functioning (2021), published in ISME Communications
  • The significance of tree-tree interactions for forest ecosystem functioning (2021), published in Basic and Applied Ecology

Kai Xue has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Yanfen Wang, Jianqing Du, Xiaoyong Cui, Yanbin Hao, and Shutong Zhou. This network of coauthors points toward interdisciplinary and collaborative approaches within environmental science and ecology.

Their work has been published in a variety of scientific journals, with multiple contributions to the following venues:

  • Geoderma
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Microbiology
  • Global Ecology and Biogeography
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Kai Xue's research spans several subfields, emphasizing ecology, soil science, atmospheric science, plant science, and nature and landscape conservation. These areas reflect an integrated approach to studying ecosystem processes and interactions within changing environments.

The main topics covered by their publications highlight consistent focus areas such as:

  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies

This comprehensive catalogue of topics and publication venues reflects a scientific career focused on understanding ecological processes relevant to environmental change, with a notable emphasis on microbial and soil ecosystems, forest ecology, and climate impacts in alpine and grassland environments.

Best Publications

  • Stochasticity, succession, and environmental perturbations in a fluidic ecosystem

    Jizhong Zhou;Jizhong Zhou;Jizhong Zhou;Ye Deng;Ye Deng;Ping Zhang;Kai Xue

  • Microbial mediation of carbon-cycle feedbacks to climate warming

    Jizhong Zhou;Kai Xue;Jianping Xie;Jianping Xie;Ye Deng

  • Temperature mediates continental-scale diversity of microbes in forest soils

    Jizhong Zhou;Jizhong Zhou;Jizhong Zhou;Ye Deng;Ye Deng;Lina Shen;Chongqing Wen

  • Methylated arsenic species in plants originate from soil microorganisms

    Charlotte Lomax;Wen-Ju Liu;Wen-Ju Liu;Liyou Wu;Kai Xue

  • Reduced microbial stability in the active layer is associated with carbon loss under alpine permafrost degradation.

    Ming-Hui Wu;Sheng-Yun Chen;Jian-Wei Chen;Kai Xue

  • Tundra soil carbon is vulnerable to rapid microbial decomposition under climate warming

    Kai Xue;Kai Xue;Mengting M. Yuan;Zhou J. Shi;Yujia Qin

  • Stochastic assembly leads to alternative communities with distinct functions in a bioreactor microbial community.

    Jizhong Zhou;Jizhong Zhou;Jizhong Zhou;Wenzong Liu;Wenzong Liu;Ye Deng;Yi-Huei Jiang

  • Responses of the functional structure of soil microbial community to livestock grazing in the Tibetan alpine grassland

    Yunfeng Yang;Linwei Wu;Qiaoyan Lin;Mengting Yuan

  • Differentiation strategies of soil rare and abundant microbial taxa in response to changing climatic regimes.

    Yuting Liang;Xian Xiao;Erin E. Nuccio;Mengting Yuan

  • Long-term balanced fertilization increases the soil microbial functional diversity in a phosphorus-limited paddy soil.

    Jian Qiang Su;Long Jun Ding;Kai Xue;Huai Ying Yao

  • GeoChip 4: a functional gene-array-based high-throughput environmental technology for microbial community analysis.

    Qichao Tu;Hao Yu;Hao Yu;Hao Yu;Zhili He;Ye Deng

  • Warming enhances old organic carbon decomposition through altering functional microbial communities

    Lei Cheng;Lei Cheng;Naifang Zhang;Mengting Yuan;Jing Xiao

  • Long-term soil transplant simulating climate change with latitude significantly alters microbial temporal turnover.

    Yuting Liang;Yuji Jiang;Feng Wang;Chongqing Wen

  • Soil Microbial Community Responses to a Decade of Warming as Revealed by Comparative Metagenomics

    Chengwei Luo;Luis M. Rodriguez-R;Eric R. Johnston;Liyou Wu

  • Evaluation of the reproducibility of amplicon sequencing with Illumina MiSeq platform.

    Chongqing Wen;Chongqing Wen;Liyou Wu;Yujia Qin;Joy D. Van Nostrand

  • Shifts of tundra bacterial and archaeal communities along a permafrost thaw gradient in Alaska.

    Jie Deng;Yunfu Gu;Yunfu Gu;Jin Zhang;Kai Xue

  • Autotrophic and symbiotic diazotrophs dominate nitrogen-fixing communities in Tibetan grassland soils.

    Rongxiao Che;Yongcui Deng;Fang Wang;Weijin Wang

  • Functional gene differences in soil microbial communities from conventional, low-input and organic farmlands

    Kai Xue;Liyou Wu;Ye Deng;Zhili He

  • Microbial mediation of biogeochemical cycles revealed by simulation of global changes with soil transplant and cropping

    Mengxin Zhao;Kai Xue;Feng Wang;Shanshan Liu

  • Tree diversity and soil chemical properties drive the linkages between soil microbial community and ecosystem functioning

    Rémy Beugnon;Jianqing Du;Simone Cesarz;Stephanie D. Jurburg

  • Microbial Mechanisms Mediating Increased Soil C Storage under Elevated Atmospheric N Deposition

    Sarah D. Eisenlord;Zachary Freedman;Donald R. Zak;Kai Xue

  • Distinct responses of soil microbial communities to elevated CO2 and O3 in a soybean agro-ecosystem.

    Zhili He;Jinbo Xiong;Jinbo Xiong;Angela D Kent;Ye Deng

Frequent Co-Authors

Jizhong Zhou
Jizhong Zhou University of Oklahoma
Zhili He
Zhili He Sun Yat-sen University
Ye Deng
Ye Deng Chinese Academy of Sciences
Liyou Wu
Liyou Wu University of Oklahoma
Joy D. Van Nostrand
Joy D. Van Nostrand University of Oklahoma
Yanfen Wang
Yanfen Wang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Yunfeng Yang
Yunfeng Yang Tsinghua University
Xiaoyong Cui
Xiaoyong Cui University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Yanbin Hao
Yanbin Hao University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
James M. Tiedje
James M. Tiedje Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA can open doors to diverse and dynamic career pathways, often intersecting with the healthcare field. Many students seeking flexibility and advancement turn to online degrees—a trend especially prominent in nursing and allied health sciences.

If you are considering further qualifications, rn to np bridge programs provide an efficient route for registered nurses aiming to become nurse practitioners with a Master of Science in Nursing (MSN). Even individuals without a nursing background can make a direct transition; direct entry msn programs for non nurses online allow career changers and science graduates to quickly pivot into health professions.

Choosing the right institution is critical. Comparing schools is made easier with resources like capella rn to bsn vs chamberlain rn to bsn, which breaks down key differences in online degree programs. Finally, for those seeking cost-effective options, several online bsn to msn programs offer affordable pathways to advanced nursing roles.

Whether your interest lies in environmental science or the allied health sector, these online programs present flexible, accessible opportunities to shape your career.

Best Scientists Citing Kai Xue

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles