World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew C.W. Zannettino

Andrew C.W. Zannettino

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
77
Citations
22011
World Ranking
4767
National Ranking
113

Andrew C.W. Zannettino publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew C.W. Zannettino sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 316 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Andrew C.W. Zannettino D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew C.W. Zannettino sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew C.W. Zannettino is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia and has a significant body of research spanning medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work focuses on areas such as molecular biology, hematology, oncology, immunology, and surgery.

The scientist has contributed extensively to several topics within the biomedical field. These include:

  • Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Chemokine receptors and signaling
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis

Frequent publication venues for Zannettino's work include:

  • Internal Medicine Journal
  • Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia
  • Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • ANZ Journal of Surgery

Zannettino has coauthored numerous papers with several researchers, such as:

  • Kate Vandyke
  • Jacqueline E. Noll
  • Krzysztof M. Mrozik
  • Vasilios Panagopoulos
  • D. Hewett

Notable recent papers illustrate the scope of their research interests:

  • The Balance of Stromal BMP Signaling Mediated by GREM1 and ISLR Drives Colorectal Carcinogenesis, 2020, Gastroenterology
  • Tunable Biomimetic Hydrogels from Silk Fibroin and Nanocellulose, 2020, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
  • The revival of dithiocarbamates: from pesticides to innovative medical treatments, 2021, iScience
  • Fragmentation of tissue-resident macrophages during isolation confounds analysis of single-cell preparations from mouse hematopoietic tissues, 2021, Cell Reports
  • Characterisation and evaluation of the regenerative capacity of Stro-4+ enriched bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells using bovine extracellular matrix hydrogel and a novel biocompatible melt electro-written medical-grade polycaprolactone scaffold, 2020, Biomaterials

Best Publications

  • Molecular and cellular characterisation of highly purified stromal stem cells derived from human bone marrow.

    Stan Gronthos;Andrew C. W. Zannettino;Shelley J. Hay;Songtao Shi

  • Mechanisms of magnesium-stimulated adhesion of osteoblastic cells to commonly used orthopaedic implants.

    H. Zreiqat;C. R. Howlett;A. Zannettino;P. Evans

  • Multipotential human adipose-derived stromal stem cells exhibit a perivascular phenotype in vitro and in vivo.

    A.C.W. Zannettino;S. Paton;A. Arthur;F. Khor

  • Stromal-derived factor-1 promotes the growth, survival, and development of human bone marrow stromal stem cells

    Angela Kortesidis;Andrew Zannettino;Sandra Isenmann;Songtao Shi

  • OCT-1–mediated influx is a key determinant of the intracellular uptake of imatinib but not nilotinib (AMN107): reduced OCT-1 activity is the cause of low in vitro sensitivity to imatinib

    Deborah L. White;Verity A. Saunders;Phuong Dang;Jane Engler

  • The therapeutic applications of multipotential mesenchymal/stromal stem cells in skeletal tissue repair

    Agnieszka Arthur;Andrew Zannettino;Stan Gronthos

  • The Nitrogen‐Containing Bisphosphonate, Zoledronic Acid, Influences RANKL Expression in Human Osteoblast‐Like Cells by Activating TNF‐α Converting Enzyme (TACE)

    Beiqing Pan;Amanda N. Farrugia;Luen Bik To;David M. Findlay

  • Concise review: mesenchymal stromal cells: potential for cardiovascular repair.

    Peter J. Psaltis;Peter J. Psaltis;Andrew C.W. Zannettino;Stephen G. Worthley;Stephen G. Worthley;Stan Gronthos

  • Most CML patients who have a suboptimal response to imatinib have low OCT-1 activity: higher doses of imatinib may overcome the negative impact of low OCT-1 activity

    Deborah L. White;Verity A. Saunders;Phuong Dang;Jane Engler

  • Osteoclasts control reactivation of dormant myeloma cells by remodelling the endosteal niche.

    Michelle A Lawson;Michelle M McDonald;Michelle M McDonald;Natasa Kovacic;Weng Hua Khoo;Weng Hua Khoo

  • Differential Cell Surface Expression of the STRO-1 and Alkaline Phosphatase Antigens on Discrete Developmental Stages in Primary Cultures of Human Bone Cells

    Stan Gronthos;Andrew C. W. Zannettino;Stephen E. Graves;Shuichi Ohta

  • Macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor c-fms is a novel target of imatinib

    Andrea L. Dewar;Antony C. Cambareri;Andrew C. W. Zannettino;Bernadette L. Miller

  • Metabolism of vitamin D3 in human osteoblasts : Evidence for autocrine and paracrine activities of 1α,25 -dihydroxyvitamin D3

    Gerald J. Atkins;Paul H. Anderson;David M. Findlay;Katie J. Welldon

  • RANKL expression is related to the differentiation state of human osteoblasts.

    Gerald J. Atkins;Panagiota Kostakis;Beiqing Pan;Amanda Farrugia

  • N-cadherin in cancer metastasis, its emerging role in haematological malignancies and potential as a therapeutic target in cancer.

    Krzysztof Marek Mrozik;Orest William Blaschuk;Chee Man Cheong;Andrew Christopher William Zannettino;Andrew Christopher William Zannettino

  • EZH2 and KDM6A Act as an Epigenetic Switch to Regulate Mesenchymal Stem Cell Lineage Specification

    Sarah Hemming;Dimitrios Cakouros;Sandra Isenmann;Lachlan Cooper

  • Positioning of bone marrow hematopoietic and stromal cells relative to blood flow in vivo: serially reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells reside in distinct nonperfused niches.

    Ingrid G. Winkler;Valérie Barbier;Robert Wadley;Andrew C. W. Zannettino

  • Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-κB Ligand Expression by Human Myeloma Cells Mediates Osteoclast Formation in Vitro and Correlates with Bone Destruction in Vivo

    Amanda N. Farrugia;Gerald J. Atkins;L. Bik To;Beiqing Pan

  • The proliferation and phenotypic expression of human osteoblasts on tantalum metal.

    David M Findlay;Katie Welldon;Gerald J Atkins;Donald W Howie;Donald W Howie

  • Elevated Serum Levels of Stromal-Derived Factor-1α Are Associated with Increased Osteoclast Activity and Osteolytic Bone Disease in Multiple Myeloma Patients

    Andrew C.W. Zannettino;Amanda N. Farrugia;Angela Kortesidis;Jim Manavis

Frequent Co-Authors

Stan Gronthos
Stan Gronthos University of Adelaide
David M. Findlay
David M. Findlay University of Adelaide
Timothy P. Hughes
Timothy P. Hughes South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute
Sally Martin
Sally Martin University of Queensland
Carl R. Walkley
Carl R. Walkley Hudson Institute of Medical Research
Peter Ghosh
Peter Ghosh Hudson Institute of Medical Research
Songtao Shi
Songtao Shi University of Pennsylvania
Paul J. Simmons
Paul J. Simmons The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Prashanthan Sanders
Prashanthan Sanders University of Adelaide
Namita Roy Choudhury
Namita Roy Choudhury RMIT University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online biology degrees opens up opportunities for students who want to study Biology and Biochemistry with greater flexibility. These programs are ideal for self-motivated learners aiming to balance studies alongside work or family commitments.

Many students interested in life sciences also consider healthcare careers. An asn program online is a fast way to start a nursing career, with coursework designed for remote learners who want to quickly transition into patient care and clinical roles.

For those passionate about human health and diet, an online nutrition degree can lead to roles in nutrition counseling, healthcare, or wellness industries. These programs often focus on the science of nutrition, public health, and contemporary dietary needs.

Moving into healthcare management is another promising pathway. If you're interested in leadership roles within hospitals or healthcare systems, cahme accredited mha programs are accredited options designed for aspiring healthcare administrators, blending science backgrounds with strategic management skills.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew C.W. Zannettino

Trending Scientists