World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
59806
World Ranking
10317
National Ranking
589

Amanda J. Baxter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda J. Baxter sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 64 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Amanda J. Baxter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda J. Baxter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Christopher J.L. Murray;Theo Vos;Rafael Lozano;Mohsen Naghavi

  • A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Stephen S. Lim;Theo Vos;Abraham D. Flaxman;Goodarz Danaei

  • Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Theo Vos;Abraham D. Flaxman;Mohsen Naghavi;Rafael Lozano

  • Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

    Harvey A. Whiteford;Harvey A. Whiteford;Louisa Degenhardt;Louisa Degenhardt;Juergen Rehm;Juergen Rehm;Amanda J. Baxter;Amanda J. Baxter

  • Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

    Theo Vos;Ryan M. Barber;Brad Bell;Amelia Bertozzi-Villa

  • Global prevalence of anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-regression

    A. J. Baxter;K. M. Scott;T. Vos;H. A. Whiteford

  • Common values in assessing health outcomes from disease and injury: disability weights measurement study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

    Joshua A. Salomon;Theo Vos;Daniel R. Hogan;Michael Gagnon

  • The epidemiology and global burden of autism spectrum disorders

    A. J. Baxter;T. S. Brugha;H. E. Erskine;R. W. Scheurer

  • Global variation in the prevalence and incidence of major depressive disorder: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature

    Alize Ferrari;Adele Somerville;Amanda Baxter;Rosana Norman

  • Global Burden of Disease Attributable to Illicit Drug Use and Dependence: Findings From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Louisa Degenhardt;Louisa Degenhardt;Harvey A Whiteford;Harvey A Whiteford;Alize J Ferrari;Alize J Ferrari;Amanda J Baxter;Amanda J Baxter

  • The global burden of anxiety disorders in 2010

    A. J. Baxter;T. Vos;K. M. Scott;A. J. Ferrari

  • The burden attributable to mental and substance use disorders as risk factors for suicide: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Alize J. Ferrari;Rosana E. Norman;Greg Freedman;Amanda J. Baxter

  • The global coverage of prevalence data for mental disorders in children and adolescents.

    H. E. Erskine;A. J. Baxter;G. Patton;T. E. Moffitt

  • Challenging the myth of an "epidemic" of common mental disorders: trends in the global prevalence of anxiety and depression between 1990 and 2010.

    Amanda J. Baxter;Amanda J. Baxter;Kate M. Scott;Alize J. Ferrari;Alize J. Ferrari;Rosana E. Norman;Rosana E. Norman

  • Estimating remission from untreated major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    H. A. Whiteford;M. G. Harris;G. McKeon;A. Baxter

  • The burden of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders in China and India: a systematic analysis of community representative epidemiological studies

    Fiona J Charlson;Fiona J Charlson;Fiona J Charlson;Amanda J Baxter;Amanda J Baxter;Amanda J Baxter;Hui G Cheng;Rahul Shidhaye;Rahul Shidhaye

  • Global epidemiology of mental disorders: what are we missing?

    Amanda J. Baxter;George Patton;Kate M. Scott;Louisa Degenhardt;Louisa Degenhardt

  • The global epidemiology and burden of psychostimulant dependence: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Louisa Degenhardt;Louisa Degenhardt;Amanda J. Baxter;Yong Yi Lee;Yong Yi Lee;Wayne Hall

  • Excess mortality from mental, neurological and substance use disorders in the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Fiona J Charlson;Amanda J Baxter;Tarun Dua;Louisa Degenhardt

  • Increased mortality among people with schizophrenia and other non-affective psychotic disorders in the community: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Padraig Oakley;Steve Kisely;Amanda Baxter;Meredith Harris

Frequent Co-Authors

Harvey Whiteford
Harvey Whiteford University of Queensland
Fiona J Charlson
Fiona J Charlson Centre for Mental Health
Theo Vos
Theo Vos Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
Louisa Degenhardt
Louisa Degenhardt University of New South Wales
Rosana E. Norman
Rosana E. Norman Queensland University of Technology
John J. McGrath
John J. McGrath Aarhus University
Holly E. Erskine
Holly E. Erskine University of Queensland
James G. Scott
James G. Scott QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Christopher J L Murray
Christopher J L Murray University of Washington
Alan D. Lopez
Alan D. Lopez University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Amanda J. Baxter