World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Alf Nachemson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alf Nachemson sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Alf Nachemson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alf Nachemson sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alf Nachemson was affiliated with the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. Throughout their career, they contributed to the academic community primarily through their research work while associated with this institution.

The available data does not contain specific details regarding their recent papers, co-authors, or main fields of study, and no publications in particular venues have been documented. Similarly, information about book publications or awards received is also not present.

Although specifics about research topics or subfields are not listed, the academic presence at a well-established university suggests involvement in scholarly activities consistent with a research-focused academic position.

The career of Alf Nachemson is noted as complete, given the indication that they are deceased.

Best Publications

  • A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury.

    Stanley J. Bigos;Michele C. BattiÉ;Dan M. Spengler;Lloyd D. Fisher

  • Evidence of Augmented Central Pain Processing in Idiopathic Chronic Low Back Pain

    Thorsten Giesecke;Richard H. Gracely;Masilo A. B. Grant;Alf Nachemson;Alf Nachemson

  • A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies

    Clermont E. Dionne;Kate M. Dunn;Peter R. Croft;Alf L. Nachemson

  • Disc pressure measurements.

    Alf L. Nachemson

  • Spinal-fusion surgery - the case for restraint.

    Richard A. Deyo;Alf Nachemson;Sohail K. Mirza

  • The Effect of Graded Activity on Patients with Subacute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Study with an Operant-Conditioning Behavioral Approach

    Ingalill Lindström;Carl Öhlund;Claes Eek;Leif Wallin

  • Nutrition of the intervertebral disc: solute transport and metabolism.

    S. Holm;A. Maroudas;J. P. G. Urban;G. Selstam

  • The Lumbar Spine An Orthopaedic Challenge

    Alf L. Nachemson

  • Long-term follow-up of patients with untreated scoliosis. A study of mortality, causes of death, and symptoms.

    Kerstin Pehrsson;Sven Larsson;Anders Oden;Alf Nachemson

  • LONG-TERM ANATOMIC AND FUNCTIONAL CHANGES IN PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS TREATED BY HARRINGTON ROD FUSION

    T. Cochran;L. Irstam;A. Nachemson

  • Newest knowledge of low back pain. A critical look.

    Alf L. Nachemson

  • Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. I. Overview and cost analysis.

    Dan M. Spengler;Stanley J. Bigos;Nancy A. Martin;Judith Zeh

  • Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments. Influence of age, sex, disc level, and degeneration.

    Alf L. Nachemson;Albert B. Schultz;Michael H. Berkson

  • The Bone Mineral Content and Ultimate Compressive Strength of Lumbar Vertebrae

    Tommy Hansson;Bengt Roos;Alf Nachemson

  • A longitudinal, prospective study of industrial back injury reporting.

    Stanley J. Bigos;Michele C. Battie;Dan M. Spengler;Lloyd D. Fisher

  • Nutrition of the intervertebral disk. An in vivo study of solute transport.

    J. P. G. Urban;S. Holm;A. Maroudas;A. Nachemson

  • Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. II. Injury factors.

    Stanley J. Bigos;Dan M. Spengler;Nancy A. Martin;Judith Zeh

  • Nutrition of the intervertebral disc: effect of fluid flow on solute transport.

    J. P. G. Urban;S. Holm;A. Maroudas;A. Nachemson

  • Mobility, strength, and fitness after a graded activity program for patients with subacute low back pain. A randomized prospective clinical study with a behavioral therapy approach

    Ingalill Lindström;Carl Öhlund;Claes Eek;Leif Wallin

  • The influence of backrest inclination and lumbar support on lumbar lordosis.

    Andersson Gb;Murphy Rw;Ortengren R;Nachemson Al

Frequent Co-Authors

Lloyd D. Fisher
Lloyd D. Fisher University of Washington
Lex M. Bouter
Lex M. Bouter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Alice Maroudas
Alice Maroudas Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Maurits W. van Tulder
Maurits W. van Tulder Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Shmuel Reis
Shmuel Reis Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Paul G. Shekelle
Paul G. Shekelle RAND Corporation
Claire Bombardier
Claire Bombardier University of Toronto
Gary J. Macfarlane
Gary J. Macfarlane University of Aberdeen
Bart W. Koes
Bart W. Koes Erasmus University Rotterdam
Rachelle Buchbinder
Rachelle Buchbinder Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields that can be studied online, offering flexibility and diverse career opportunities. If you’re interested in the organizational side of healthcare, a health care administration degree prepares graduates to manage medical facilities and lead in healthcare delivery systems.

For nursing professionals looking to advance, asn to fnp bridge programs are a popular option. These programs help registered nurses with an associate’s degree transition seamlessly into roles as Family Nurse Practitioners, expanding clinical knowledge and patient care capabilities.

Students interested in preventive care and wellness may pursue a nutrition degree online. This pathway is ideal for those who want to impact community health by promoting healthy eating and lifestyle changes.

Aspiring healthcare leaders may consider cahme accredited online mha programs to gain advanced skills in healthcare administration and policy. These programs offer rigorous, accredited training required for executive positions in the industry.

Best Scientists Citing Alf Nachemson

Recently Published Articles