World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alexander G. Rabchevsky

Alexander G. Rabchevsky

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
8053
World Ranking
6020
National Ranking
2630

Alexander G. Rabchevsky publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander G. Rabchevsky sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 84 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Alexander G. Rabchevsky D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander G. Rabchevsky sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexander G. Rabchevsky is affiliated with the University of Kentucky in the United States and is active in research primarily related to medicine, with significant contributions also to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work spans several subfields including pathology and forensic medicine, molecular biology, neurology, surgery, and clinical biochemistry.

The scientist's research topics focus substantially on spinal cord injury research and mitochondrial function and pathology. Additional areas of study include traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, metabolism and genetic disorders, pain management and treatment, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, and traumatic brain injury research.

Rabchevsky has contributed to multiple recent papers, including:

  • Recommendations for mitochondria transfer and transplantation nomenclature and characterization, 2025, Nature Metabolism
  • Mitochondria focused neurotherapeutics for spinal cord injury, 2020, Experimental Neurology
  • Needs, priorities, and attitudes of individuals with spinal cord injury toward nerve stimulation devices for bladder and bowel function: a survey, 2020, Spinal Cord
  • Erodible thermogelling hydrogels for localized mitochondrial transplantation to the spinal cord, 2022, Mitochondrion
  • Meeting Proceedings for SCI 2020: Launching a Decade of Disruption in Spinal Cord Injury Research, 2020, Journal of Neurotrauma

The venues where Rabchevsky frequently publishes include:

  • Mitochondrion
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Journal of Neural Engineering
  • Neurotrauma Reports
  • Nature Metabolism

Collaborations are an important part of this scientist's work. Frequent co-authors include Felicia M. Michael, Samir P. Patel, Patrick G. Sullivan, Jennifer N. Dulin, and Matthew Rodreick, with varying degrees of collaboration ranging from three to seven joint works.

Best Publications

  • Experimental modeling of spinal cord injury: characterization of a force-defined injury device.

    Stephen W. Scheff;Alexander G. Rabchevsky;Isabella Fugaccia;John A. Main

  • Mitochondrial permeability transition in CNS trauma: cause or effect of neuronal cell death?

    P.G. Sullivan;A.G. Rabchevsky;P.C. Waldmeier;J.E. Springer

  • Exacerbation of Damage and Altered NF-κB Activation in Mice Lacking Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptors after Traumatic Brain Injury

    Patrick G. Sullivan;Annadora J. Bruce-Keller;Alexander G. Rabchevsky;Sylivia Christakos

  • Grafting of cultured microglial cells into the lesioned spinal cord of adult rats enhances neurite outgrowth.

    A.G. Rabchevsky;W.J. Streit

  • Autonomic dysreflexia after spinal cord injury: Systemic pathophysiology and methods of management.

    Khalid C. Eldahan;Alexander G. Rabchevsky

  • Role of peroxynitrite in secondary oxidative damage after spinal cord injury

    Yiqin Xiong;Alexander G. Rabchevsky;Edward D. Hall

  • Autonomic Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury

    Shaoping Hou;Alexander G Rabchevsky

  • Temporal characterization of mitochondrial bioenergetics after spinal cord injury.

    Patrick G. Sullivan;Sairam Krishnamurthy;Samir P. Patel;Jignesh D. Pandya

  • Rat Models of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury to Assess Motor Recovery

    Stephen M. Onifer;Alexander G. Rabchevsky;Stephen W. Scheff

  • Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF) Enhances Functional Recovery Following Severe Spinal Cord Injury to the Rat

    A.G. Rabchevsky;I. Fugaccia;A.F. Turner;D.A. Blades

  • Autonomic Dysreflexia Causes Chronic Immune Suppression after Spinal Cord Injury

    Yi Zhang;Zhen Guan;Brenda Reader;Todd Shawler

  • Effects of Mitochondrial Transplantation on Bioenergetics, Cellular Incorporation, and Functional Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury.

    Jenna L. Gollihue;Samir P. Patel;Khalid C. Eldahan;David H. Cox

  • Cellular and subcellular oxidative stress parameters following severe spinal cord injury.

    Nishant P. Visavadiya;Samir P. Patel;Jenna L. VanRooyen;Patrick G. Sullivan

  • Cyclosporin A treatment following spinal cord injury to the rat: behavioral effects and stereological assessment of tissue sparing.

    Alexander G. Rabchevsky;Isabella Fugaccia;Patrick G. Sullivan;Stephen W. Scheff

  • Dose-response curve and optimal dosing regimen of cyclosporin A after traumatic brain injury in rats.

    P.G Sullivan;A.G Rabchevsky;R.R Hicks;T.R Gibson

  • Efficacy of methylprednisolone therapy for the injured rat spinal cord.

    Alexander G. Rabchevsky;Isabella Fugaccia;Patrick G. Sullivan;Deborah A. Blades

  • Intrinsic differences in brain and spinal cord mitochondria: Implication for therapeutic interventions.

    Patrick G. Sullivan;Alexander G. Rabchevsky;Jeffery N. Keller;Mark Lovell

  • Genetic manipulation of intraspinal plasticity after spinal cord injury alters the severity of autonomic dysreflexia.

    Adrian A. Cameron;George M. Smith;David C. Randall;David R. Brown

  • A Role for Transforming Growth Factor α as an Inducer of Astrogliosis

    Alexander G. Rabchevsky;Juno M. Weinitz;Muriel Coulpier;Christiane Fages

  • Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) enhances tissue sparing and functional recovery following moderate spinal cord injury.

    Alexander G. Rabchevsky;Isabella Fugaccia;Anita Fletcher-Turner;Deborah A. Blades

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick G. Sullivan
Patrick G. Sullivan University of Kentucky
Stephen W. Scheff
Stephen W. Scheff University of Kentucky
Wolfgang J. Streit
Wolfgang J. Streit University of Florida
Bret N. Smith
Bret N. Smith University of Kentucky
David S.K. Magnuson
David S.K. Magnuson University of Louisville
Joe E. Springer
Joe E. Springer University of Kentucky
Phillip G. Popovich
Phillip G. Popovich The Ohio State University
Mark P. Mattson
Mark P. Mattson Johns Hopkins University
George M. Smith
George M. Smith Temple University
Stefan Stamm
Stefan Stamm University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in neuroscience grows, many students are exploring flexible options for advancing their education online. Numerous online courses with certificates can complement neuroscience studies and boost your employability—especially in fields such as data analysis, psychology, or healthcare.

If you’re searching for a more accessible path, some students choose an easiest online bachelor's degree that aligns with neuroscience-related careers. These programs can provide foundational knowledge without being overwhelming.

Affordability is a key concern. For those interested in social work or behavior management, consider one of the cheapest online msw or bcba masters programs online. Both options are affordable, reputable, and open new career pathways intertwined with neuroscience, such as mental health support or applied behavior analysis.

Regardless of your career stage, exploring these online degrees and certifications can help you gain valuable skills, enhance your resume, and pursue various neuroscience-related roles in research, therapy, or healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander G. Rabchevsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles