World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 52 13715 12351 544 525 199 7574

Alberto Cepeda publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alberto Cepeda between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alberto Cepeda published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2016. 21 of the 349 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2016. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 9 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 11 publications
1972 2025

349 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alberto Cepeda: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 1
1974 2
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 9
1991 3
1992 2
1993 1
1994 4
1995 5
1996 12
1997 6
1998 3
1999 3
2000 3
2001 10
2002 7
2003 4
2004 4
2005 8
2006 4
2007 7
2008 9
2009 15
2010 20
2011 15
2012 19
2013 8
2014 9
2015 12
2016 22
2017 12
2018 18
2019 15
2020 11
2021 15
2022 16
2023 9
2024 10
2025 11
Total 349
Download as CSV

Alberto Cepeda publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alberto Cepeda sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 199 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344 199
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Alberto Cepeda D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alberto Cepeda sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872 52
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Alberto Cepeda is affiliated with the University of Santiago de Compostela in Spain. Their research spans several interconnected fields including Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine.

Their work is notably concentrated in the subfields of Molecular Biology, Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Insect Science. This diverse expertise supports extensive investigation into nutritional studies and diet, gut microbiota and health, and probiotic and fermented foods.

Among the key topics addressed in Alberto Cepeda's publications are:

  • Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on functional nutrition and food science. Selected recent works include:

  • "Potential Use of Marine Seaweeds as Prebiotics: A Review" (2020, Molecules)
  • "Breast Milk: A Source of Functional Compounds with Potential Application in Nutrition and Therapy" (2021, Nutrients)
  • "Animal-Origin Prebiotics Based on Chitin: An Alternative for the Future? A Critical Review" (2020, Foods)
  • "Probiotic Effects against Virus Infections: New Weapons for an Old War" (2021, Foods)
  • "Complementary Methods to Improve the Depuration of Bivalves: A Review" (2020, Foods)

Alberto Cepeda frequently collaborates with various researchers, including:

  • Alexandre Lamas
  • Alejandra Cardelle-Cobas
  • Patricia Regal
  • José Manuel Miranda
  • C. M. Franco

Their publications are primarily concentrated in scientific journals such as Foods, Nutrients, and Molecules, among others. The distribution of their publications by venue includes:

  • Foods (13 publications)
  • Nutrients (9 publications)
  • Molecules (3 publications)
  • Current Opinion in Food Science (2 publications)
  • Frontiers in Nutrition (2 publications)

Best Publications

  • Review of methods for analysis of carotenoids

    K.T. Amorim-Carrilho;A. Cepeda;C. Fente;P. Regal

  • Application of the assay of aflatoxins by liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection in food analysis

    J Jaimez;C.A Fente;B.I Vazquez;C.M Franco

  • Inhibitory effects of eugenol and thymol on Penicillium citrinum strains in culture media and cheese.

    Beatriz I. Vázquez;C. Fente;C.M. Franco;M.J. Vázquez

  • Food additives, contaminants and other minor components: effects on human gut microbiota—a review

    Paula Roca-Saavedra;Veronica Mendez-Vilabrille;Jose Manuel Miranda;Carolina Nebot

  • Determination of quinolones in animal tissues and eggs by high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode-array detection.

    P.G Gigosos;P.R Revesado;O Cadahı́a;C.A Fente

  • New additive for culture media for rapid identification of aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus strains

    C. A. Fente;J. Jaimez Ordaz;B. I. Vázquez;C. M. Franco

  • In-vitro anti-inflammatory effect of Eucalyptus globulus and Thymus vulgaris: nitric oxide inhibition in J774A.1 murine macrophages.

    E Vigo;A Cepeda;O Gualillo;R Perez-Fernandez

  • Dispersive Solid Phase Extraction for the Analysis of Veterinary Drugs Applied to Food Samples: A Review.

    Gabriela Islas;Israel S. Ibarra;Prisciliano Hernandez;Jose M. Miranda

  • Determination of fat, protein, and total solids in cheese by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy.

    José Louis Rodriguez-Otero;Maria Hermida;Alberto Cepeda

  • Syntheses of molecularly imprinted polymers: Molecular recognition of cyproheptadine using original print molecules and azatadine as dummy templates.

    X. Feás;J.A. Seijas;M.P. Vázquez-Tato;P. Regal

  • Mineral content of the honeys produced in Galicia (North-west Spain)

    J.L. Rodriguez-Otero;P. Paseiro;J. Simal;A. Cepeda

  • Monitoring the presence of residues of tetracyclines in baby food samples by HPLC-MS/MS

    Carolina Nebot;Mónica Guarddon;Fernando Seco;Alejandra Iglesias

  • Magnetic solid phase extraction followed by high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of sulphonamides in milk samples.

    Israel S. Ibarra;Jose M. Miranda;Jose A. Rodriguez;Carolina Nebot

  • Detection and quantification of spoilage and pathogenic Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis by real-time PCR.

    I.C. Fernández-No;M. Guarddon;K. Böhme;A. Cepeda

  • Short Chain Fatty Acids Commonly Produced by Gut Microbiota Influence Salmonella enterica Motility, Biofilm Formation, and Gene Expression

    Alexandre Lamas;Patricia Regal;Beatriz Vázquez;Alberto Cepeda

  • Antimicrobial resistance in Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from organic chicken, conventional chicken and conventional turkey meat : A comparative survey

    J.M. Miranda;M. Guarddon;B.I. Vázquez;C.A. Fente

  • Effect of cooking on enrofloxacin residues in chicken tissue

    M Lolo;S Pedreira;J M Miranda;B I Vázquez

  • Detection and quantitative analysis of 21 veterinary drugs in river water using high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry.

    Alejandra Iglesias;Carolina Nebot;Jose M. Miranda;Beatriz I. Vázquez

  • Animal-Origin Prebiotics Based on Chitin: An Alternative for the Future? A Critical Review

    Aroa Lopez-Santamarina;Alicia Del Carmen Mondragon;Alexandre Lamas;Jose Manuel Miranda

  • Simple and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence method for the determination of citrinin application to the analysis of fungal cultures and cheese extracts

    C.M. Franco;C.A. Fente;B. Vazquez;A. Cepeda

  • Determination of clenbuterol residues in bovine hair by using diphasic dialysis and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

    C.A Fente;B.I Vázquez;C Franco;A Cepeda

  • Development of a Hamburger Patty with Healthier Lipid Formulation and Study of its Nutritional, Sensory, and Stability Properties

    Beatriz Martínez;Jose M. Miranda;Beatriz I. Vázquez;Cristina A. Fente

  • Development of a method for direct visual determination of aflatoxin production by colonies of the Aspergillus flavus group

    J Jaimez Ordaz;C A Fente;B I Vázquez;C M Franco

Frequent Co-Authors

Jorge Barros-Velázquez
Jorge Barros-Velázquez University of Santiago de Compostela
José A. Rodríguez
José A. Rodríguez Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo
Lucas Domínguez
Lucas Domínguez Complutense University of Madrid
José Manuel Gallardo
José Manuel Gallardo Spanish National Research Council
Lei Ye
Lei Ye Lund University
Oreste Gualillo
Oreste Gualillo Servicio Gallego de Salud
Jean-Philippe Antignac
Jean-Philippe Antignac INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Manuel Vázquez
Manuel Vázquez Spanish National Research Council
Santiago P. Aubourg
Santiago P. Aubourg Spanish National Research Council
Bruno Le Bizec
Bruno Le Bizec INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond traditional Chemistry programs, pursuing an online bachelor's degree in forensic science offers a practical blend of chemistry, biology, and criminal investigation. This degree pathway provides foundational knowledge applicable to crime scene analysis and forensic lab work.

For those seeking advanced specialization, an online masters forensic psychology offers insights into criminal behavior and psychological assessment—valuable in profiling and legal consultations, complementing scientific skills with behavioral expertise.

Exploring forensic career paths and salary reveals diverse job opportunities where chemistry graduates can apply their knowledge in forensic toxicology, DNA analysis, or evidence examination. Awareness of career prospects and salary expectations is crucial when selecting a specialization.

It’s also important to consider the financial investment. Reviewing the cost of criminal justice degree programs provides a useful comparison for affordability when choosing between related fields such as forensic science and criminal justice.

Overall, these related online degrees and career pathways enable Chemistry students to broaden their professional horizons in exciting, interdisciplinary areas.

Best Scientists Citing Alberto Cepeda

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles