World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
39
Citations
5286
World Ranking
6433
National Ranking
77

Alan F. Mark publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan F. Mark sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 119 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Alan F. Mark D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan F. Mark sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alan F. Mark is affiliated with the University of Otago in New Zealand. Their academic work is associated with this institution, reflecting a focus within the New Zealand research environment.

There are no records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main or subfields of study, or main topics of work available for Alan F. Mark in the provided data. Similarly, there is no information regarding awards or honors received.

This profile is based solely on verified affiliation details without additional publication or collaboration insights. The absence of detailed records on publications, research topics, or awards suggests that the publicly available academic footprint is limited or has not been documented in the current dataset.

Best Publications

  • Facilitative plant interactions and climate simultaneously drive alpine plant diversity

    Lohengrin A. Cavieres;Rob W. Brooker;Bradley J. Butterfield;Bradley J. Cook

  • Altitudinal variation in stomatal conductance, nitrogen content and leaf anatomy in different plant life forms in New Zealand.

    Ch. Körner;P. Bannister;A. F. Mark

  • Of mast and mean: differential-temperature cue makes mast seeding insensitive to climate change

    Dave Kelly;Andre Geldenhuis;Alex James;E. Penelope Holland

  • Climate-Change Effects on Alpine Plant Biodiversity: A New Zealand Perspective on Quantifying the Threat

    Stephan R. P. Halloy;Alan F. Mark

  • Late Pleistocene and Holocene vegetation history, Central Otago, South Island, New Zealand

    M. S McGlone;A. F. Mark;D. Bell

  • The high-alpine vegetation of Central Otago, New Zealand

    A. F. Mark;L. C. Bliss

  • Flowering, seeding, and seedling establishment of narrow-leaved Snow Tussock, Chionochloa Rigida

    A.F. Mark

  • Will loss of snow cover during climatic warming expose New Zealand alpine plants to increased frost damage

    Peter Bannister;Tanja Maegli;Katharine J. M. Dickinson;Stephan R. P. Halloy

  • Causes of the species-area relation : a study of islands in lake Manapouri, New Zealand

    B. J. Kelly;J. Bastow Wilson;A. F. Mark

  • The benefits of being in a bad neighbourhood: plant community composition influences red deer foraging decisions

    Jennie N. Bee;Andrew J. Tanentzap;William G. Lee;Roger B. Lavers

  • High-alpine environments and primary production on the Rock and Pillar Range, Central Otago, New Zealand

    L. C. Bliss;A. F. Mark

  • Floral initiation and development in New Zealand alpine plants

    A. F. Mark

  • Bryophyte island biogeography: a study in Lake Manapouri, New Zealand

    Ray S. Tangney;J. Bastow Wilson;Alan F. Mark;R. S. Tangney

  • Comparative leaf morphology spectra of plant communities in New Zealand, the Andes and the European Alps

    S. R. P. Halloy;A. F. Mark

  • The Environment and Growth Rate of Narrow-Leaved Snow Tussock, Chionochloa Rigida, in Otago

    A. F. Mark

  • ECOLOGY OF SNOW TUSSOCKS IN THE MOUNTAIN GRASSLANDS OF NEW ZEALAND

    A. F. Mark

  • Maximizing water yield with indigenous non‐forest vegetation: a New Zealand perspective

    Alan F Mark;Katharine Jm Dickinson

  • What limits the spread of fire‐dependent vegetation? Evidence from geographic variation of serotiny in a New Zealand shrub

    William J. Bond;Katharine J. M. Dickinson;Alan F. Mark

  • Distribution, abundance and biomass of epiphyte-lianoid communities in a New Zealand lowland Nothofagus-podocarp temperate rain forest: tropical comparisons

    Robert G. M. Hofstede;Katharine J. M. Dickinson;Alan F. Mark

  • Effects of Management Practices on Narrow-leaved Snow Tussock, Chionochloa rigida

    A. F. Mark

  • Aspects of the ecology of the indigenous shrub Leptospermum scoparium (Myrtaceae) in New Zealand

    Yin Ronghua;A. F. Mark;J. B. Wilson

  • Alpine Vegetation, Plant Distribution, Life Forms, and Environments in a Perhumid New Zealand Region: Oceanic and Tropical High Mountain Affinities

    Alan F. Mark;Katharine J. M. Dickinson;Robert G. M. Hofstede

  • The conservation status of New Zealand's indigenous grasslands

    Alan F. Mark;Bruce McLennan

Frequent Co-Authors

Katharine J. M. Dickinson
Katharine J. M. Dickinson University of Otago
J. Bastow Wilson
J. Bastow Wilson University of Otago
William G. Lee
William G. Lee Landcare Research
David A. Coomes
David A. Coomes University of Cambridge
Andrew J. Tanentzap
Andrew J. Tanentzap University of Cambridge
Matt S. McGlone
Matt S. McGlone Landcare Research
Dave Kelly
Dave Kelly University of Canterbury
Catherine Chagué-Goff
Catherine Chagué-Goff University of New South Wales
Renaud Mathieu
Renaud Mathieu International Rice Research Institute
Richard P. Pharis
Richard P. Pharis University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest grows in fields like Ecology and Evolution, students often explore related online degrees and diverse career pathways. Interdisciplinary study is common, with some students branching into healthcare, communication sciences, or nursing—fields that value scientific knowledge and research skills.

One popular crossover is speech-language pathology. For those seeking flexible learning, there are asha approved slp programs online that balance speed with professional standards. Individuals from non-traditional backgrounds may also consider an slp bridge program to transition smoothly from related majors into this rewarding career.

For those interested in nursing, especially with a science foundation, accelerated nursing programs for non nurses offer a fast-track option to become registered nurses even without prior nursing experience. Mental health is another expanding field—students can use their science training as a stepping stone toward specialized roles, such as a Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner, and check the latest pmhnp salary by state for detailed earning insights.

Combining your ecology or evolution knowledge with healthcare or communication science not only broadens your expertise, but also unlocks a wide range of impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Alan F. Mark

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles