World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
22
Citations
1876
World Ranking
3109
National Ranking
162

Ala E. Tabor publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ala E. Tabor sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 86 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Ala E. Tabor D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ala E. Tabor sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 22 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Identification of a mutation in the para-sodium channel gene of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus associated with resistance to synthetic pyrethroid acaricides.

    Jess A.T. Morgan;Sean W. Corley;Sean W. Corley;Louise A. Jackson;Louise A. Jackson;Ala E. Lew-Tabor;Ala E. Lew-Tabor;Ala E. Lew-Tabor

  • Immunological profiles of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle infested with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.

    Emily K. Piper;Nicholas N. Jonsson;Nicholas N. Jonsson;Cedric Gondro;Cedric Gondro;Ala E. Lew-Tabor;Ala E. Lew-Tabor

  • Cattle Tick Rhipicephalus microplus-Host Interface: A Review of Resistant and Susceptible Host Responses

    Ala E. Tabor;Ala E. Tabor;Abid Ali;Abid Ali;Gauhar Rehman;Gustavo Rocha Garcia

  • Strategies for new and improved vaccines against ticks and tick‐borne diseases

    J. de la Fuente;J. de la Fuente;P. Kopáček;A. Lew-Tabor;A. Lew-Tabor;C. Maritz-Olivier

  • Tick-susceptible Bos taurus cattle display an increased cellular response at the site of larval Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus attachment, compared with tick-resistant Bos indicus cattle

    Emily K. Piper;Louise A. Jackson;Helle Bielefeldt-Ohmann;Helle Bielefeldt-Ohmann;Cedric Gondro;Cedric Gondro

  • Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for the specific detection and quantification of seven Eimeria species that cause coccidiosis in chickens.

    J.A.T. Morgan;G.M. Morris;B.M. Wlodek;R. Byrnes

  • Local immune response against larvae of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus cattle

    C.C. Constantinoiu;L.A. Jackson;W.K. Jorgensen;A.E. Lew-Tabor;A.E. Lew-Tabor

  • CattleTickBase: an integrated Internet-based bioinformatics resource for Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.

    Matthew I. Bellgard;Paula M. Moolhuijzen;Paula M. Moolhuijzen;Felix D. Guerrero;David Schibeci

  • Comparative analysis of Tritrichomonas foetus (Riedmüller, 1928) cat genotype, T. foetus (Riedmüller, 1928) cattle genotype and Tritrichomonas suis (Davaine, 1875) at 10 DNA loci

    Jan Šlapeta;Norbert Müller;Colin M. Stack;Giselle Walker

  • Interrogating the bovine reproductive tract metagenomes using culture-independent approaches: a systematic review.

    Chian Teng Ong;Conny Turni;Patrick J. Blackall;Gry Boe-Hansen

  • Gene expression evidence for off-target effects caused by RNA interference-mediated gene silencing of Ubiquitin-63E in the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus

    A.E. Lew-Tabor;S. Kurscheid;R. Barrero;C. Gondro

  • Suppressive subtractive hybridization analysis of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus larval and adult transcript expression during attachment and feeding.

    Ala E. Lew-Tabor;Paula M. Moolhuijzen;Paula M. Moolhuijzen;Megan E. Vance;Sebastian Kurscheid;Sebastian Kurscheid

  • Technical note: overcoming host contamination in bovine vaginal metagenomic samples with Nanopore adaptive sequencing.

    Chian Teng Ong;Elizabeth M Ross;Gry B Boe-Hansen;Conny Turni

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students pursuing Animal Science and Veterinary studies often explore related fields to diversify their skills and career options. For instance, those interested in leadership roles within sports programs may consider pathways like becoming an athletic director, a role blending management and health sciences.

Additionally, the growing demand for health and fitness professionals encourages students to look into exercise science degrees online. These programs offer flexible learning suited for those wishing to complement their animal science background with human physiology and fitness expertise.

For those drawn to behavioral sciences, exploring bcba masters programs could be beneficial. Board Certified Behavior Analyst training equips students with intervention skills applicable across species, including animals with behavioral challenges.

Lastly, understanding psychological principles is key in many scientific careers. Students might find value in affordable education by researching the cheapest online school psychology programs, which provide foundational knowledge applicable in both human and animal-related professions.