World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 36 8947 8264 432 396 57 6721

Abdelkrim Alloui publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Abdelkrim Alloui between 1995 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Abdelkrim Alloui published across 24 years, from 1995 to 2018, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2003. 3 of the 60 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2003. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 2 publications
1995 2018

60 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Abdelkrim Alloui: publications per year, 1995 to 2018
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 2
1997 2
1998 1
1999 1
2000 3
2001 4
2002 3
2003 10
2004 3
2005 2
2006 1
2007 1
2008 2
2009 4
2010 3
2011 2
2012 1
2013 4
2014 5
2015 1
2016 1
2017 1
2018 2
Total 60
Download as CSV

Abdelkrim Alloui publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abdelkrim Alloui sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 48–57 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 57 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79 57
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Abdelkrim Alloui D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abdelkrim Alloui sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 36
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Abdelkrim Alloui is a researcher affiliated with the University of Clermont Auvergne in France. Their academic work is situated within this institution, contributing to its research output and academic environment.

Information about Abdelkrim Alloui's research includes a lack of recent published papers, co-authors, publication venues, and book publications. This absence of publicly available data on these aspects makes it difficult to detail specific publications, collaborations, or books authored by the researcher.

Likewise, details on main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work connected to Abdelkrim Alloui have not been documented in the current data. As a result, the exact areas of expertise and research interests remain unspecified.

No awards or recognitions have been recorded for Abdelkrim Alloui at this time.

Best Publications

  • The effects of total sleep deprivation, selective sleep interruption and sleep recovery on pain tolerance thresholds in healthy subjects.

    S. Hakki Onen;Abdelkrim Alloui;Annette Gross;Alain Eschallier

  • Silencing of the Cav3.2 T-type calcium channel gene in sensory neurons demonstrates its major role in nociception

    Emmanuel Bourinet;Abdelkrim Alloui;Arnaud Monteil;Christian Barrère

  • TREK-1, a K+ channel involved in polymodal pain perception

    Abdelkrim Alloui;Katharina Zimmermann;Julien Mamet;Fabrice Duprat

  • Black mamba venom peptides target acid-sensing ion channels to abolish pain

    S. Diochot;A. Baron;M. Salinas;D. Douguet

  • ASIC3, a sensor of acidic and primary inflammatory pain

    Emmanuel Deval;Jacques Noël;Nadège Lay;Abdelkrim Alloui

  • The mechano‐activated K+ channels TRAAK and TREK‐1 control both warm and cold perception

    Jacques Noël;Katharina Zimmermann;Jérome Busserolles;Jérome Busserolles;Emanuel Deval

  • A tarantula peptide against pain via ASIC1a channels and opioid mechanisms

    Michel Mazzuca;Catherine Heurteaux;Abdelkrim Alloui;Sylvie Diochot

  • T-type calcium channels contribute to colonic hypersensitivity in a rat model of irritable bowel syndrome

    Fabrice Marger;Agathe Gelot;Abdelkrim Alloui;Julien Matricon

  • Acid-sensing Ion Channels in Postoperative Pain

    Emmanuel Deval;Jacques Noël;Xavier Gasull;Anne Delaunay

  • TAFA4, a Chemokine-like Protein, Modulates Injury-Induced Mechanical and Chemical Pain Hypersensitivity in Mice

    Marie-Claire Delfini;Annabelle Mantilleri;Stéphane Gaillard;Jizhe Hao

  • Role of the TREK2 potassium channel in cold and warm thermosensation and in pain perception.

    Vanessa Pereira;Vanessa Pereira;Jérôme Busserolles;Jérôme Busserolles;Marine Christin;Marine Christin;Maïly Devilliers;Maïly Devilliers

  • Group III metabotropic glutamate receptors inhibit hyperalgesia in animal models of inflammation and neuropathic pain.

    Cyril Goudet;Eric Chapuy;Abdelkrim Alloui;Francine Acher

  • Paracetamol exerts a spinal antinociceptive effect involving an indirect interaction with 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptors: in vivo and in vitro evidence.

    T Pelissier;A Alloui;F Caussade;C Dubray

  • Effects of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep deprivation on pain sensitivity in the rat.

    S Hakki Onen;Abdelkrim Alloui;Didier Jourdan;Alain Eschalier

  • Antinociceptive mechanism of action of paracetamol

    Jérôme Bonnefont;Jean-Philippe Courade;Abdelkrim Alloui;Alain Eschalier

  • State-dependent properties of a new T-type calcium channel blocker enhance CaV3.2 selectivity and support analgesic effects

    Amaury Francois;Nicolas Kerckhove;Nicolas Kerckhove;Mathieu Meleine;Mathieu Meleine;Abdelkrim Alloui;Abdelkrim Alloui

  • T-type calcium channel inhibition underlies the analgesic effects of the endogenous lipoamino acids.

    Guillaume Barbara;Abdelkrim Alloui;Joël Nargeot;Philippe Lory

  • Paracetamol exerts a spinal, tropisetron-reversible, antinociceptive effect in an inflammatory pain model in rats.

    Abdelkrim Alloui;Claude Chassaing;Jeannot Schmidt;Denis Ardid

  • Spinal 5-HT1A receptors differentially influence nociceptive processing according to the nature of the noxious stimulus in rats: effect of WAY-100635 on the antinociceptive activities of paracetamol, venlafaxine and 5-HT.

    Jérôme Bonnefont;Eric Chapuy;Eric Clottes;Abdelkrim Alloui

  • Effect of intrathecal administration of serotonin in chronic pain models in rats

    Laurent Bardin;Jeannot Schmidt;Abdelkrim Alloui;Alain Eschalier

Frequent Co-Authors

Michel Lazdunski
Michel Lazdunski Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Emmanuel Bourinet
Emmanuel Bourinet University of Montpellier
Peter W. Reeh
Peter W. Reeh University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Marc Landry
Marc Landry University of Bordeaux
Terrance P. Snutch
Terrance P. Snutch University of British Columbia
Jean-Philippe Pin
Jean-Philippe Pin University of Montpellier
Florian Lesage
Florian Lesage Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Yves Rayssiguier
Yves Rayssiguier University of Clermont Auvergne
Philippe Lory
Philippe Lory University of Montpellier
Catherine Heurteaux
Catherine Heurteaux Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often overlaps with other rewarding fields such as psychology, social work, and behavior analysis. Students aiming for roles in mental health or behavioral sciences might consider options beyond traditional neuroscience degrees. Many accredited universities now offer flexible online graduate degrees to help working professionals upskill efficiently.

Affordable options are widely sought after. For those interested in social work, there are affordable online msw programs that provide foundational training in mental health and community services. If you are keen on focusing on applied behavior analysis, check out reputable bcba master's programs online that cater to aspiring Board Certified Behavior Analysts.

If your goal is to graduate quickly, consider enrolling in an accelerated msw program to fast-track your journey into advanced social work roles. Similarly, accelerated and fast track psychology degree programs exist for those looking to enter the field of psychology or neuroscience-related careers at a faster pace.

Best Scientists Citing Abdelkrim Alloui

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles