A scientist’s position in this ranking is determined by their D-index (Discipline H-index), a refined metric that accounts exclusively for scholarly output and citations within the specified discipline of Ecology and Evolution. This approach enables a focused and fair assessment of each researcher’s influence within their primary area of expertise.
Scope of Research and Ranking Criteria
This ranking was constructed after an exhaustive examination of 279,971 scientist profiles systematically identified from a range of authoritative bibliometric sources covering all academic disciplines. Within the Ecology and Evolution domain, 3,000 scientists were specifically analyzed to establish a relevant and robust cohort.
To qualify for inclusion, a scientist needed to meet the following stringent criteria:
- A minimum D-index score of 30 within Ecology and Evolution.
- A majority of their tier publications—defined as those in top-tier journals or conferences—must be concentrated within the Ecology and Evolution field.
- Consideration of awards and notable achievements specifically related to Ecology and Evolution research.
The threshold for the D-index is methodically calibrated. It increments by 10 points relative to the estimated total number of scholars in each discipline, thereby ensuring the representation of the top 1% of leading experts within the list. Furthermore, a proximity of 30% or less between a researcher’s general H-index and their D-index is required to guarantee consistency and true disciplinary focus in the ranking metrics.
Verification and Validation of Profiles
Understanding the limitations of relying solely on raw bibliometric data, the Research.com team undertook meticulous manual verification of every scientist’s profile featured in the ranking. This process involved cross-correlating publication records against a broad range of trustworthy and established sources to validate the accuracy and relevance of the data.
While contributions such as the number of papers published in prestigious journals and conference proceedings are not directly factored into determining a researcher’s rank, these serve as valuable secondary indicators of their scholarly impact within Ecology and Evolution.
Ultimately, the position in the ranking is established based on the D-index values derived from OpenAlex and CrossRef data — recognized as the most prominent and well-curated bibliometric databases accessible to the research community at large.
For detailed information on the dataset collection, ranking methodology, and verification procedures involved in assembling this ranking, we invite the reader to consult our methodology page.
Research.com’s Mission and Agenda
The overarching mission of Research.com in producing this ranking is to inspire researchers, corporate entities, and policymakers worldwide to gain clear insights into the trajectories and focal areas of leading experts. By providing a transparent and meticulously curated listing of top scientists in Ecology and Evolution, as well as other disciplines, we aim to facilitate the global scientific community’s ability to identify and connect with preeminent scholars.
This ranking empowers academic institutions, funding agencies, and research organizations to recognize outstanding contributors within specific fields, serving as a reliable benchmark of excellence. Commitment to careful data curation, comprehensive verification, and openness underpins our dedication to supporting the advancement of science worldwide.