International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS)

This comprehensive ranking presents a curated list of scientific conferences within the field of Computer Science, offering an authoritative evaluation of their impact and significance in the research community. The ranking was meticulously prepared by Research.com, a prominent website recognized for its trusted contributions to scientific research assessment across all major fields since 2014, with a particular focus on Computer Science.

Positions in the ranking are determined using a proprietary bibliometric score developed by the experts at Research.com. This unique metric incorporates both the estimated h-index of each conference and the number of leading scientists who have presented at the conference over the past three years. Such a multifaceted approach ensures a robust and meaningful measure of a conference’s academic influence and visibility.

Impact Score values for the listed conferences were gathered on 2024-11-27 to provide an up-to-date and relevant perspective. The process for establishing this ranking was both exhaustive and rigorous, involving detailed inspection and systematic evaluation of more than 2,742 conferences. This effort was underpinned by an analysis of over 148,739 scientific documents published in the last three years by 13,184 leading and highly respected scientists specializing in Computer Science.

For a detailed overview of the methodology and the comprehensive processes employed in calculating the ranking scores, please consult our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems (based on the number of publications) are:

• Milind Tambe (128 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Nicholas R. Jennings (122 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Peter Stone (91 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Michael Wooldridge (87 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Makoto Yokoo (84 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems (based on the number of publications) are:

• Carnegie Mellon University (258 papers) absent at the last edition,
• University of Southern California (248 papers) absent at the last edition,
• University of Southampton (202 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Bar-Ilan University (167 papers) absent at the last edition,
• University of Liverpool (155 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 9.52% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 21.05% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 2.63% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 21.05% of all publications and 55.26% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.