World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
63
Citations
26607
World Ranking
2683
National Ranking
1331

Zoran Obradovic publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoran Obradovic sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 376 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Zoran Obradovic D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoran Obradovic sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Zoran Obradovic is affiliated with Temple University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research at the intersection of computer science, engineering, and medicine. Their work predominantly focuses on areas such as artificial intelligence, electrical and electronic engineering, and safety, risk, reliability, and quality.

The scientist's research encompasses several specialized subfields including artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience, and signal processing. They have explored various topics such as energy load and power forecasting, power system reliability and maintenance, machine learning applications in healthcare, time series analysis and forecasting, anomaly detection techniques, topic modeling, and artificial intelligence specifically applied in healthcare contexts.

Frequent publication venues for Obradovic include IEEE Access, Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, and arXiv. These platforms highlight a diverse range of interdisciplinary output.

Co-authorship has played a significant role in Obradovic's scholarly work. Regular collaborators include Mladen Kezunović, Martin Pavlovski, Avrum Gillespie, Ameen Abdel Hai, and Jumanah Alshehri, indicating sustained partnerships across multiple projects.

Some notable recent papers published by Obradovic include:

  • "Big data analytics for future electricity grids" (2020), published in Electric Power Systems Research
  • "DescribePROT: database of amino acid-level protein structure and function predictions" (2020), published in Nucleic Acids Research
  • "Predicting complications of diabetes mellitus using advanced machine learning algorithms" (2020), published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • "Influence of medical domain knowledge on deep learning for Alzheimer's disease prediction" (2020), published in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
  • "Hierarchical Convolutional Neural Networks for Event Classification on PMU Measurements" (2021), published in IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Obradovic was recognized as a Member of Academia Europaea in 2015, an acknowledgment reflecting engagement with the broader academic community.

Best Publications

  • The unfoldomics decade: an update on intrinsically disordered proteins

    A Keith Dunker;Christopher J Oldfield;Jingwei Meng;Pedro Romero

  • Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins.

    Lilia M. Iakoucheva;Celeste J. Brown;J.David Lawson;Zoran Obradović

  • Length-dependent prediction of protein intrinsic disorder

    Kang Peng;Predrag Radivojac;Slobodan Vucetic;A Keith Dunker

  • DisProt: the Database of Disordered Proteins

    Megan Sickmeier;Justin A. Hamilton;Tanguy LeGall;Vladimir Vacic

  • Intrinsic protein disorder in complete genomes.

    A K Dunker;Z Obradovic;P Romero;E C Garner

  • Intrinsic Disorder and Functional Proteomics

    Predrag Radivojac;Lilia M. Iakoucheva;Christopher J. Oldfield;Zoran Obradovic

  • Predicting Protein Disorder for N-, C-, and Internal Regions.

    X Li;P Romero;M Rani;AK Dunker

  • D2P2: database of disordered protein predictions

    Matt E. Oates;Pedro Romero;Takashi Ishida;Mohamed F. Ghalwash

  • The protein trinity--linking function and disorder.

    A. Keith Dunker;Zoran Obradovic

  • Functional anthology of intrinsic disorder. 1. Biological processes and functions of proteins with long disordered regions.

    Hongbo Xie;Slobodan Vucetic;Lilia M. Iakoucheva;Christopher J. Oldfield

  • Exploiting heterogeneous sequence properties improves prediction of protein disorder.

    Zoran Obradovic;Kang Peng;Slobodan Vucetic;Predrag Radivojac

  • Optimizing long intrinsic disorder predictors with protein evolutionary information.

    Kang Peng;Slobodan Vucetic;Predrag Radivojac;Celeste J. Brown

  • Predicting Intrinsic Disorder From Amino Acid Sequence

    Zoran Obradovic;Kang Peng;Slobodan Vucetic;Predrag Radivojac

  • Alternative splicing in concert with protein intrinsic disorder enables increased functional diversity in multicellular organisms

    Pedro R. Romero;Saima Zaidi;Ya Yin Fang;Vladimir N. Uversky

  • Protein disorder and the evolution of molecular recognition: theory, predictions and observations.

    A. K. Dunker;E. Garner;S. Guilliot;P. Romero

  • Identification and functions of usefully disordered proteins.

    A. Keith Dunker;Celeste J. Brown;Zoran Obradovic

  • Minimum redundancy maximum relevance feature selection approach for temporal gene expression data

    Milos D. Radovic;Mohamed F. Ghalwash;Mohamed F. Ghalwash;Mohamed F. Ghalwash;Nenad Filipovic;Zoran Obradovic

  • Functional Anthology of Intrinsic Disorder. 3. Ligands, Post-Translational Modifications, and Diseases Associated with Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

    Hongbo Xie;Slobodan Vucetic;Lilia M. Iakoucheva;Christopher J. Oldfield

  • Functional anthology of intrinsic disorder. 2. Cellular components, domains, technical terms, developmental processes, and coding sequence diversities correlated with long disordered regions.

    Slobodan Vucetic;Hongbo Xie;Lilia M. Iakoucheva;Christopher J. Oldfield

  • Identifying disordered regions in proteins from amino acid sequence

    P. Romero;Z. Obradovic;C. Kissinger;J.E. Villafranca

  • Thousands of proteins likely to have long disordered regions.

    P Romero;Z Obradovic;C R Kissinger;J E Villafranca

Frequent Co-Authors

Slobodan Vucetic
Slobodan Vucetic Temple University
A. Keith Dunker
A. Keith Dunker Indiana University
Vladimir N. Uversky
Vladimir N. Uversky University of South Florida
Pedro Romero
Pedro Romero University of Lausanne
Predrag Radivojac
Predrag Radivojac Northeastern University
Christopher J. Oldfield
Christopher J. Oldfield Virginia Commonwealth University
Celeste J. Brown
Celeste J. Brown University of Idaho
Mladen Kezunovic
Mladen Kezunovic Texas A&M University
Vipin Kumar
Vipin Kumar University of Minnesota
Ingrid R. Olson
Ingrid R. Olson Temple University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in Computer Science opens up a range of flexible study options and diverse career paths. For students who may not have a high GPA, there are excellent universities for low gpa that offer quality online programs. These options help make a technology-focused education more accessible.

Looking to fast-track your entry into the tech field? Consider an online degree from one of the fastest computer science degree programs. These accelerated programs let you earn your degree in less time and enter the workforce sooner.

Computer Science skills also pair well with other fields. For example, if you are interested in environmental issues or education, you may want to explore careers you can pursue with jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree backgrounds.

For engineering-minded students, obtaining an environmental engineer degree online is another rewarding pathway that blends technology with real-world impact. With these varied options, online education allows you to customize your learning and career direction.

Best Scientists Citing Zoran Obradovic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles