World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 57 195 195 64 64 327 10801
Computer Science 67 2229 2162 307 304 517 14958

Ximeng Liu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ximeng Liu between 2013 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ximeng Liu published across 13 years, from 2013 to 2025, averaging 45.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 112 publications in 2023. 117 of the 591 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2013 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 112. Peak 112 publications in 2023. 2013: 16 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 35 publications 2019: 50 publications 2020: 76 publications 2021: 90 publications 2022: 59 publications 2023: 112 publications 2024: 86 publications 2025: 31 publications
2013 2025

591 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ximeng Liu: publications per year, 2013 to 2025
Year Publications
2013 16
2014 11
2015 7
2016 10
2017 8
2018 35
2019 50
2020 76
2021 90
2022 59
2023 112
2024 86
2025 31
Total 591
Download as CSV

Ximeng Liu publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ximeng Liu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 512–521 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 517 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57 517
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Ximeng Liu D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ximeng Liu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249 67
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Ximeng Liu is affiliated with Fuzhou University in China. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with particular emphasis on several subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The scientist's work addresses a range of topics including:

  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

Ximeng Liu has contributed to multiple papers, among which recent notable publications include:

  • Privacy and Security Issues in Deep Learning: A Survey, 2020, IEEE Access
  • An Efficient Decentralized Key Management Mechanism for VANET With Blockchain, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
  • FLEAM: A Federated Learning Empowered Architecture to Mitigate DDoS in Industrial IoT, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
  • PACE: Privacy-Preserving and Quality-Aware Incentive Mechanism for Mobile Crowdsensing, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
  • An Efficient Blockchain-Based Hierarchical Data Sharing for Healthcare Internet of Things, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Yinbin Miao, Robert H. Deng, Jianfeng Ma, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, and Xinghua Li.

Ximeng Liu's work is often published in respected venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
  • IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing

Best Publications

  • Toward efficient and privacy-preserving computing in big data era

    Rongxing Lu;Hui Zhu;Ximeng Liu;Joseph K. Liu

  • Privacy-preserving smart IoT-based healthcare big data storage and self-adaptive access control system

    Yang Yang;Xianghan Zheng;Xianghan Zheng;Wenzhong Guo;Wenzhong Guo;Ximeng Liu

  • Privacy-Preserving Patient-Centric Clinical Decision Support System on Naïve Bayesian Classification

    Ximeng Liu;Rongxing Lu;Jianfeng Ma;Le Chen

  • An Efficient Privacy-Preserving Outsourced Calculation Toolkit With Multiple Keys

    Ximeng Liu;Robert H. Deng;Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo;Jian Weng

  • Privacy and Security Issues in Deep Learning: A Survey

    Ximeng Liu;Lehui Xie;Yaopeng Wang;Jian Zou

  • Blockchain based efficient and robust fair payment for outsourcing services in cloud computing

    Yinghui Zhang;Robert H. Deng;Ximeng Liu;Dong Zheng

  • Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Outsourced Calculation of Rational Numbers

    Ximeng Liu;Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo;Robert H. Deng;Rongxing Lu

  • A Personalized Privacy Protection Framework for Mobile Crowdsensing in IIoT

    Jinbo Xiong;Rong Ma;Lei Chen;Youliang Tian

  • FLEAM: A Federated Learning Empowered Architecture to Mitigate DDoS in Industrial IoT

    Jianhua Li;Lingjuan Lyu;Ximeng Liu;Ximeng Liu;Xuyun Zhang

  • Privacy-Preserving Attribute-Based Keyword Search in Shared Multi-owner Setting

    Yinbin Miao;Ximeng Liu;Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo;Robert H. Deng

  • An Efficient Decentralized Key Management Mechanism for VANET with Blockchain

    Zhuo Ma;Junwei Zhang;Yongzhen Guo;Yang Liu

  • A Lightweight Privacy-Preserving CNN Feature Extraction Framework for Mobile Sensing

    Kai Huang;Ximeng Liu;Shaojing Fu;Deke Guo

  • Lightweight Fine-Grained Search Over Encrypted Data in Fog Computing

    Yinbin Miao;Jianfeng Ma;Ximeng Liu;Jian Weng

  • Practical Attribute-Based Multi-Keyword Search Scheme in Mobile Crowdsourcing

    Yinbin Miao;Jianfeng Ma;Ximeng Liu;Xinghua Li

  • An Efficient Blockchain-Based Hierarchical Data Sharing for Healthcare Internet of Things

    Unknown

  • Outsourcing Service Fair Payment Based on Blockchain and Its Applications in Cloud Computing

    Yinghui Zhang;Robert H. Deng;Ximeng Liu;Dong Zheng

  • Secure, efficient and revocable multi-authority access control system in cloud storage

    Qi Li;Jianfeng Ma;Rui Li;Ximeng Liu

  • Attribute-Based Keyword Search over Hierarchical Data in Cloud Computing

    Yinbin Miao;Jianfeng Ma;Ximeng Liu;Xinghua Li

  • Lightweight Break-Glass Access Control System for Healthcare Internet-of-Things

    Yang Yang;Ximeng Liu;Robert H. Deng

  • Multi-dimensional feature fusion and stacking ensemble mechanism for network intrusion detection

    Hao Zhang;Jie-Ling Li;Xi-Meng Liu;Chen Dong

  • Public-key authenticated encryption with keyword search revisited: Security model and constructions

    Baodong Qin;Yu Chen;Qiong Huang;Ximeng Liu

  • Hybrid privacy-preserving clinical decision support system in fog–cloud computing

    Ximeng Liu;Ximeng Liu;Robert H. Deng;Yang Yang;Yang Yang;Ngoc Hieu Tran

Frequent Co-Authors

Jianfeng Ma
Jianfeng Ma Xidian University
Robert H. Deng
Robert H. Deng Singapore Management University
Yinbin Miao
Yinbin Miao Xidian University
Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo
Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo The University of Texas at San Antonio
Wenzhong Guo
Wenzhong Guo Fuzhou University
Hongwei Li
Hongwei Li University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Yang Liu
Yang Liu Linköping University
Jian Weng
Jian Weng Jinan University
Rongxing Lu
Rongxing Lu Queen's University
Yingjiu Li
Yingjiu Li University of Oregon

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to several related online degrees and diverse career pathways. As technology continues to evolve, pursuing the best degree to get within the field can greatly enhance your job prospects and earning potential. From software engineering to data analytics, selecting a program that aligns with industry demands is crucial.

For those looking to advance quickly, there are easiest masters programs to get into that provide flexible entry requirements and can be completed online. If cost is a concern, consider cheap doctoral programs that offer strong academic credentials without the high tuition fees often associated with traditional campus-based study.

Education professionals interested in leadership roles might look into edd programs, which provide opportunities for rapid career advancement through fast-track online options. Weighing all of these educational pathways can help you make informed decisions that align with your career goals in computer science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Ximeng Liu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles